Javascript must be enabled to continue!
SISMIKO: emergency network deployment and data sharing for the 2016 central Italy seismic sequence
View through CrossRef
<p>At 01:36 UTC (03:36 local time) on August 24th 2016, an earthquake Mw 6.0 struck an extensive sector of the central Apennines (coordinates: latitude 42.70° N, longitude 13.23° E, 8.0 km depth). The earthquake caused about 300 casualties and severe damage to the historical buildings and economic activity in an area located near the borders of the Umbria, Lazio, Abruzzo and Marche regions. The Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV) located in few minutes the hypocenter near Accumoli, a small town in the province of Rieti. In the hours after the quake, dozens of events were recorded by the National Seismic Network (Rete Sismica Nazionale, RSN) of the INGV, many of which had a ML > 3.0. The density and coverage of the RSN in the epicentral area meant the epicenter and magnitude of the main event and subsequent shocks that followed it in the early hours of the seismic sequence were well constrained. However, in order to better constrain the localizations of the aftershock hypocenters, especially the depths, a denser seismic monitoring network was needed. Just after the mainshock, SISMIKO, the coordinating body of the emergency seismic network at INGV, was activated in order to install a temporary seismic network integrated with the existing permanent network in the epicentral area. From August the 24th to the 30th, SISMIKO deployed eighteen seismic stations, generally six components (equipped with both velocimeter and accelerometer), with thirteen of the seismic station transmitting in real-time to the INGV seismic monitoring room in Rome. The design and geometry of the temporary network was decided in consolation with other groups who were deploying seismic stations in the region, namely EMERSITO (a group studying site-effects), and the emergency Italian strong motion network (RAN) managed by the National Civil Protection Department (DPC). Further 25 BB temporary seismic stations were deployed by colleagues of the British Geological Survey (BGS) and the School of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh in collaboration with INGV. All data acquired from SISMIKO stations, are quickly available at the European Integrated Data Archive (EIDA). The data acquired by the SISMIKO stations were included in the preliminary analysis that was performed by the Bollettino Sismico Italiano (BSI), the Centro Nazionale Terremoti (CNT) staff working in Ancona, and the INGV-MI, described below.</p>
Instituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, INGV
Milena Moretti
Silvia Pondrelli
Lucia Margheriti
Luigi Abruzzese
Mario Anselmi
Pierre Arroucau
Paola Baccheschi
Brian Baptie
Raffaele Bonadio
Andrea Bono
Augusto Bucci
Mauro Buttinelli
Marco Capello
Vincenzo Cardinale
Angelo Castagnozzi
Marco Cattaneo
Gianpaolo Cecere
Claudio Chiarabba
Lauro Chiaraluce
Giovanni Battista Cimini
Rocco Cogliano
Gianfranco Colasanti
Marco Colasanti
Fabio Criscuoli
Ezio D’Alema
Antonino D’Alessandro
Ciriaco D’Ambrosio
Peter Danecek
Mariagrazia De Caro
Pasquale De Gori
Alberto Delladio
Gaetano De Luca
Giovanni De Luca
Martina Demartin
Maria Di Nezza
Raffaele Di Stefano
Luigi Falco
Massimo Fares
Massimo Frapiccini
Alberto Frepoli
Danilo Galluzzo
Edoardo Giandomenico
Lucian Giovani
Carlo Giunchi
Aladino Govoni
David Hawthorn
Chiara Ladina
Valentino Lauciani
Anthony Lindsay
Simone Mancini
Alfonso Giovanni Mandiello
Simone Marzorati
Marco Massa
Antonino Memmolo
Franco Migliari
Felice Minichiello
Giancarlo Monachesi
Caterina Montuori
Raffaele Moschillo
Shane Murphy
Nicola Mauro Pagliuca
Marina Pastori
Davide Piccinini
Ulderico Piccolini
Stefano Pintore
Giulio Poggiali
Sandro Rao
Gilberto Saccorotti
Margarita Segou
Andrea Serratore
Marcello Silvestri
Stefano Silvestri
Massimiliano Vallocchia
Luisa Valoroso
Luciano Zuccarello
Alberto Michelini
Salvatore Mazza
Title: SISMIKO: emergency network deployment and data sharing for the 2016 central Italy seismic sequence
Description:
<p>At 01:36 UTC (03:36 local time) on August 24th 2016, an earthquake Mw 6.
0 struck an extensive sector of the central Apennines (coordinates: latitude 42.
70° N, longitude 13.
23° E, 8.
0 km depth).
The earthquake caused about 300 casualties and severe damage to the historical buildings and economic activity in an area located near the borders of the Umbria, Lazio, Abruzzo and Marche regions.
The Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV) located in few minutes the hypocenter near Accumoli, a small town in the province of Rieti.
In the hours after the quake, dozens of events were recorded by the National Seismic Network (Rete Sismica Nazionale, RSN) of the INGV, many of which had a ML > 3.
The density and coverage of the RSN in the epicentral area meant the epicenter and magnitude of the main event and subsequent shocks that followed it in the early hours of the seismic sequence were well constrained.
However, in order to better constrain the localizations of the aftershock hypocenters, especially the depths, a denser seismic monitoring network was needed.
Just after the mainshock, SISMIKO, the coordinating body of the emergency seismic network at INGV, was activated in order to install a temporary seismic network integrated with the existing permanent network in the epicentral area.
From August the 24th to the 30th, SISMIKO deployed eighteen seismic stations, generally six components (equipped with both velocimeter and accelerometer), with thirteen of the seismic station transmitting in real-time to the INGV seismic monitoring room in Rome.
The design and geometry of the temporary network was decided in consolation with other groups who were deploying seismic stations in the region, namely EMERSITO (a group studying site-effects), and the emergency Italian strong motion network (RAN) managed by the National Civil Protection Department (DPC).
Further 25 BB temporary seismic stations were deployed by colleagues of the British Geological Survey (BGS) and the School of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh in collaboration with INGV.
All data acquired from SISMIKO stations, are quickly available at the European Integrated Data Archive (EIDA).
The data acquired by the SISMIKO stations were included in the preliminary analysis that was performed by the Bollettino Sismico Italiano (BSI), the Centro Nazionale Terremoti (CNT) staff working in Ancona, and the INGV-MI, described below.
</p>.
Related Results
Proceedings of the Qatar Paediatric Emergency Medicine 2026 Conference - Selected Abstracts
Proceedings of the Qatar Paediatric Emergency Medicine 2026 Conference - Selected Abstracts
Welcome to this issue of Panorama of Emergency Medicine (POEM) dedicated to the 10th Qatar Paediatric Emergency Medicine (Q-PEM) International Conference which was organised and ho...
Seismic Frequency Enhancement for Mapping and Reservoir Characterization of Arab Formation: Case Study Onshore UAE
Seismic Frequency Enhancement for Mapping and Reservoir Characterization of Arab Formation: Case Study Onshore UAE
Abstract
Mapping and discrimination of Upper Jurassic Arab reservoirs (Arab A/B/C and D) in this 3D seismic onshore field of Abu Dhabi, is very sensitive to the seis...
4D Seismic on Gullfaks
4D Seismic on Gullfaks
SUMMARY
New technologies are rapidly emerging helping to obtain optimal drainage of large reservoirs. 4D seismic is such a reservoir monitoring technique. The phy...
Integrated Hydrocarbon Detection Based on Full Frequency Pre-Stack Seismic Inversion
Integrated Hydrocarbon Detection Based on Full Frequency Pre-Stack Seismic Inversion
Abstract
To improve the accuracy of hydrocarbon detection, seismic amplitude variation with offset (AVO), seismic amplitude variation with frequency (AVF), and direc...
Stochastic Rock Physics Inversion
Stochastic Rock Physics Inversion
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to introduce a stochastic seismic inversion algorithm based on Markov Chain Monte Carlo Simulation. The suggested inversion ...
Seismic Evaluation of Platform Cranes
Seismic Evaluation of Platform Cranes
ABSTRACT
Design of platforms in potentially seismic regions requires a thorough seismic analysis of both the platform and the equipment mounted to it. Typically, ...
AI/ML Method for Seismic Well Tie Support on the OSDU Platform: Predicting Missing Wireline and Checkshot Data Using Well Borehole, Mudlog, and Seismic Data
AI/ML Method for Seismic Well Tie Support on the OSDU Platform: Predicting Missing Wireline and Checkshot Data Using Well Borehole, Mudlog, and Seismic Data
Abstract
In this study, we introduce an AI/ML method for predicting missing wireline and checkshot data to support seismic well tie workflows. Well tie seismic is a ...
Carbonate Seismic Facies Analysis in Reservoir Characterization: A Machine Learning Approach with Integration of Reservoir Mineralogy and Porosity
Carbonate Seismic Facies Analysis in Reservoir Characterization: A Machine Learning Approach with Integration of Reservoir Mineralogy and Porosity
Amid increasing interest in enhanced oil recovery and carbon geological sequestration programs, improved static reservoir lithofacies models are emerging as a requirement for well-...

