Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Efficacy and tolerability of oral morphine versus oxycodone/acetaminophen for analgesia in the emergency department
View through CrossRef
Objective: Oxycodone/acetaminophen is one of the most commonly prescribed medications for pain management in the emergency department (ED) despite its high abuse liability. Our objective was to determine whether oral immediate-release morphine is as effective and well tolerated as oral oxycodone/acetaminophen for pain relief in stable ED patients.
Design: This is a prospective comparative study in which stable adult patients with acute painful conditions who had either oral morphine (15 or 30 mg) or oxycodone/ acetaminophen (5/325 mg or 10/650 mg) ordered for them at the discretion of a triage physician were recruited.
Setting: This study took place in an urban, academic ED from 2016 to 2019.
Participants: Seventy-three percent of the subjects were between the ages of 18 and 59, 57 percent were female, and 85 percent were African American. Most presented with abdominal, extremity, or back pain. Patient characteristics were similar between treatment groups.
Interventions: Of the 364 enrolled patients, 182 were given oral morphine and 182 were given oxycodone/acetaminophen at the discretion of the triage provider. They were asked to rate their pain score prior to receiving analgesia and at 60 and 90 minutes after administration.
Main outcome measures: We examined pain scores, adverse effects, overall satisfaction, willingness to accept the same treatment again, and the need for additional analgesia.
Results: There was no difference in satisfaction reported by patients who received morphine versus oxycodone/acetaminophen: 15.9 percent vs 16.5 percent were very satisfied, 31.9 percent vs 26.4 percent were somewhat satisfied, and 23.6 percent vs 22.5 percent were not satisfied, p = 0.56. Secondary outcomes also showed no significant difference: net change in pain score –2 vs –2 at 60 and 90 minutes, p = 0.91 and p = 0.72, respectively; adverse effects 20.9 percent vs 19.2 percent, p = 0.69; need for further analgesia 9.3 percent vs 7.1 percent, p = 0.44; willingness to accept analgesic again 73.1 percent vs 78.6 percent, p = 0.22.
Conclusions: Oral morphine is a feasible alternative to oxycodone/acetaminophen for analgesia in the ED.
Title: Efficacy and tolerability of oral morphine versus oxycodone/acetaminophen for analgesia in the emergency department
Description:
Objective: Oxycodone/acetaminophen is one of the most commonly prescribed medications for pain management in the emergency department (ED) despite its high abuse liability.
Our objective was to determine whether oral immediate-release morphine is as effective and well tolerated as oral oxycodone/acetaminophen for pain relief in stable ED patients.
Design: This is a prospective comparative study in which stable adult patients with acute painful conditions who had either oral morphine (15 or 30 mg) or oxycodone/ acetaminophen (5/325 mg or 10/650 mg) ordered for them at the discretion of a triage physician were recruited.
Setting: This study took place in an urban, academic ED from 2016 to 2019.
Participants: Seventy-three percent of the subjects were between the ages of 18 and 59, 57 percent were female, and 85 percent were African American.
Most presented with abdominal, extremity, or back pain.
Patient characteristics were similar between treatment groups.
Interventions: Of the 364 enrolled patients, 182 were given oral morphine and 182 were given oxycodone/acetaminophen at the discretion of the triage provider.
They were asked to rate their pain score prior to receiving analgesia and at 60 and 90 minutes after administration.
Main outcome measures: We examined pain scores, adverse effects, overall satisfaction, willingness to accept the same treatment again, and the need for additional analgesia.
Results: There was no difference in satisfaction reported by patients who received morphine versus oxycodone/acetaminophen: 15.
9 percent vs 16.
5 percent were very satisfied, 31.
9 percent vs 26.
4 percent were somewhat satisfied, and 23.
6 percent vs 22.
5 percent were not satisfied, p = 0.
56.
Secondary outcomes also showed no significant difference: net change in pain score –2 vs –2 at 60 and 90 minutes, p = 0.
91 and p = 0.
72, respectively; adverse effects 20.
9 percent vs 19.
2 percent, p = 0.
69; need for further analgesia 9.
3 percent vs 7.
1 percent, p = 0.
44; willingness to accept analgesic again 73.
1 percent vs 78.
6 percent, p = 0.
22.
Conclusions: Oral morphine is a feasible alternative to oxycodone/acetaminophen for analgesia in the ED.
Related Results
A randomized controlled study of intramuscular acetaminophen- diclofenac versus acetaminophen-pentazocine for pain relief during manual vacuum aspiration in university of Maiduguri teaching hospital
A randomized controlled study of intramuscular acetaminophen- diclofenac versus acetaminophen-pentazocine for pain relief during manual vacuum aspiration in university of Maiduguri teaching hospital
The management of first trimester miscarriages using manual vacuum aspiration is a cheap, fast and safe surgical method of uterine evacuation. However, this procedure generate pain...
Analgesic and adverse effects of a fixed-ratio morphine-oxycodone combination (MoxDuo®) in the treatment of postoperative pain
Analgesic and adverse effects of a fixed-ratio morphine-oxycodone combination (MoxDuo®) in the treatment of postoperative pain
Objective: To compare efficacy and safety profiles of an immediate-release morphine and oxycodone Dual-Opioid® combination (MoxDuo®) versus its individual components and versus its...
Clinical pharmacology of morphine in infants and children
Clinical pharmacology of morphine in infants and children
Morphine is used to treat pain, for treatment of opioid dependence, and neonatal abstinence syndrome. Morphine is modestly absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract whereas after re...
Double‐Blind, Randomized Comparison of the Analgesic and Pharmacokinetic Profiles of Controlled‐ and Immediate‐Release Oral Oxycodone in Cancer Pain Patients
Double‐Blind, Randomized Comparison of the Analgesic and Pharmacokinetic Profiles of Controlled‐ and Immediate‐Release Oral Oxycodone in Cancer Pain Patients
Thirty patients with cancer pain completed a double‐blind crossover study comparing controlled‐release (CR) and immediate‐release (IR) oxycodone. In open‐label titration (2 to 21 d...
Monitoring oxycodone use in patients with chronic pain: Analysis of oxycodone and metabolite excretion in saliva and urine
Monitoring oxycodone use in patients with chronic pain: Analysis of oxycodone and metabolite excretion in saliva and urine
Objective: Saliva is purported to have a close correspondence to plasma concentrations due to a passive diffusion process from plasma to saliva. However, limited data are available...
Morphine 6‐glucuronide: a metabolite of morphine with greater emetic potency than morphine in the ferret
Morphine 6‐glucuronide: a metabolite of morphine with greater emetic potency than morphine in the ferret
The emetic potencies of morphine and its metabolite morphine 6‐glucuronide have been determined in the ferret by constructing dose‐response curves for mean total retches and vomits...
Proceedings of the Qatar Paediatric Emergency Medicine 2026 Conference - Selected Abstracts
Proceedings of the Qatar Paediatric Emergency Medicine 2026 Conference - Selected Abstracts
Welcome to this issue of Panorama of Emergency Medicine (POEM) dedicated to the 10th Qatar Paediatric Emergency Medicine (Q-PEM) International Conference which was organised and ho...
Effectiveness of morphine in controlling acute pain in the emergency department
Effectiveness of morphine in controlling acute pain in the emergency department
Acute pain is one of the leading complaints in emergency departments (EDs), it contributes to patient distress and emergency service burden. Prompt and effective pain relief is an ...

