Javascript must be enabled to continue!
A randomized controlled study of intramuscular acetaminophen- diclofenac versus acetaminophen-pentazocine for pain relief during manual vacuum aspiration in university of Maiduguri teaching hospital
View through CrossRef
The management of first trimester miscarriages using manual vacuum aspiration is a cheap, fast and safe surgical method of uterine evacuation. However, this procedure generate pain as a result of cervical manipulation, insertion of cannula and suctioning of uterine cavity. This pain quite often, is intolerable to the patient. Therefore, an effective pain management intervention is necessary to abolish this pain.
Aim: The aim of this study was to compare combined acetaminophen-diclofenac with acetaminophen-pentazocine for pain relief during manual vacuum aspiration in a randomised controlled study at the University of Maiduguri Teaching Hospital.
Objective: To determine and compare the effectiveness of combined acetaminophen-diclofenac versus acetaminophen-pentazocine for pain relief during manual vacuum aspiration.
Methodology: This was a triple-blind randomised controlled study, that compared the effectiveness of combined acetaminophen-diclofenac versus acetaminophen-pentazocine as a multimodal analgesia during manual vacuum aspiration. A total of 112 participants were randomised into two groups. Participants in group A (56 patients) received combined acetaminophen-diclofenac while participants allocated in group B (56 patients) received acetaminophen-pentazocine for pain relief during manual vacuum aspiration.
The primary outcome, measured the occurrence of mild or no pain during the procedure. Secondary outcome measured the need for rescue analgesia used during the procedure. The data was entered into SPSS version 20.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA 2011) for statistical analysis.
Result: There was statistically significant difference in the effectiveness, when combined acetaminophen-pentazocine compared to combined acetaminophen-diclofenac was used during manual vacuum aspiration (P value=0.001). Majority 44(78.6%) of the participants in combined acetaminophen-pentazocine group experienced mild pain compared to 25(44. 6%) of participants in acetaminophen-diclofenac group and their mean pain scores were 2.8929(SD±1.1067) and 4.1786(SD±1.7899) respectively. When the mean pain scores of both groups were compared using the independent t-test, there was a statistically significant difference (P value = 0.001), with participants in combined acetaminophen-pentazocine group suffered less pain.
Conclusion: Combined acetaminophen-pentazocine as a form of analgesia during MVA was more effective when compared to combined acetaminophen-diclofenac.
Title: A randomized controlled study of intramuscular acetaminophen- diclofenac versus acetaminophen-pentazocine for pain relief during manual vacuum aspiration in university of Maiduguri teaching hospital
Description:
The management of first trimester miscarriages using manual vacuum aspiration is a cheap, fast and safe surgical method of uterine evacuation.
However, this procedure generate pain as a result of cervical manipulation, insertion of cannula and suctioning of uterine cavity.
This pain quite often, is intolerable to the patient.
Therefore, an effective pain management intervention is necessary to abolish this pain.
Aim: The aim of this study was to compare combined acetaminophen-diclofenac with acetaminophen-pentazocine for pain relief during manual vacuum aspiration in a randomised controlled study at the University of Maiduguri Teaching Hospital.
Objective: To determine and compare the effectiveness of combined acetaminophen-diclofenac versus acetaminophen-pentazocine for pain relief during manual vacuum aspiration.
Methodology: This was a triple-blind randomised controlled study, that compared the effectiveness of combined acetaminophen-diclofenac versus acetaminophen-pentazocine as a multimodal analgesia during manual vacuum aspiration.
A total of 112 participants were randomised into two groups.
Participants in group A (56 patients) received combined acetaminophen-diclofenac while participants allocated in group B (56 patients) received acetaminophen-pentazocine for pain relief during manual vacuum aspiration.
The primary outcome, measured the occurrence of mild or no pain during the procedure.
Secondary outcome measured the need for rescue analgesia used during the procedure.
The data was entered into SPSS version 20.
0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA 2011) for statistical analysis.
Result: There was statistically significant difference in the effectiveness, when combined acetaminophen-pentazocine compared to combined acetaminophen-diclofenac was used during manual vacuum aspiration (P value=0.
001).
Majority 44(78.
6%) of the participants in combined acetaminophen-pentazocine group experienced mild pain compared to 25(44.
6%) of participants in acetaminophen-diclofenac group and their mean pain scores were 2.
8929(SD±1.
1067) and 4.
1786(SD±1.
7899) respectively.
When the mean pain scores of both groups were compared using the independent t-test, there was a statistically significant difference (P value = 0.
001), with participants in combined acetaminophen-pentazocine group suffered less pain.
Conclusion: Combined acetaminophen-pentazocine as a form of analgesia during MVA was more effective when compared to combined acetaminophen-diclofenac.
Related Results
The Efficacy of Pentazocine + Diclofenac Versus Paracetamol + Diclofenac for Post- Caesarean Section Analgesia
The Efficacy of Pentazocine + Diclofenac Versus Paracetamol + Diclofenac for Post- Caesarean Section Analgesia
Background:
The most common major obstetric procedure is caesarean section (CS) and one of the greatest concerns for women after CS is to have optimal pain relief.
...
Pentazocine with rectal diclofenac versus pentazocine alone for pain relief following caesarean delivery in Enugu, Nigeria: A randomized controlled trial
Pentazocine with rectal diclofenac versus pentazocine alone for pain relief following caesarean delivery in Enugu, Nigeria: A randomized controlled trial
Objective
To measure postoperative pain relief following the use of rectal diclofenac combined with intramuscular pentazocine compared with intramuscular pentaz...
Pentazocine versus tramadol-paracetamol combination as analgesia in labor: A randomized controlled trial
Pentazocine versus tramadol-paracetamol combination as analgesia in labor: A randomized controlled trial
Objectives:
Labor should be a satisfactory experience and effective pain management should be employed as recommended by the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. ...
Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Abstract
Introduction
Although the efficacy of PD-L1 blockade has been evaluated in analyses that combine pharmacologically distinct antibodies, the specific efficacy and safety of...
Differential Diagnosis of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Review
Differential Diagnosis of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Review
Abstract
Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a complex and often overlooked condition caused by the compression of neurovascular structures as they pass through the thoracic outlet. ...
A Comparative Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Intravenous Infusion Acetaminophen and Intramuscular Diclofenac for Post-Hysterectomy Pain Management: The AIDA Study
A Comparative Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Intravenous Infusion Acetaminophen and Intramuscular Diclofenac for Post-Hysterectomy Pain Management: The AIDA Study
After a hysterectomy, efficient pain management is crucial to the healing and comfort of the patient. In order to manage post-hysterectomy pain, this study compared the effectivene...
Oral versus Rectal Diclofenac Sodium: Comparison of efficacy for Perineal pain relief after Episiotomy
Oral versus Rectal Diclofenac Sodium: Comparison of efficacy for Perineal pain relief after Episiotomy
Objective: To compare the efficacy of oral diclofenac sodium and diclofenac suppository for perineal pain relief after episiotomy. Study Design: Prospective randomized clinical tri...
Water-soluble contrast agent during swallowing study increases aspiration sensitivity and antedates oral feeding without respiratory and drug complications: a prospective, observational, case-control Trial v1
Water-soluble contrast agent during swallowing study increases aspiration sensitivity and antedates oral feeding without respiratory and drug complications: a prospective, observational, case-control Trial v1
Water-soluble contrast agent during swallowing study increases aspiration sensitivity and antedates oral feeding without respiratory and drug complications: a prospective, observat...

