Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Satires

View through CrossRef
The title is uncertain. Horace usessaturagenerically in ii. 1. 1 andsaturaein ii. 6. 17, but elsewhere he uses the wordsermones, which Porphyrio asserts was the title of the work. This name best reflects the conversational style and structure.The Greek background to theSatiresHorace expressed when he described them asBionei sermones (Epist.ii. 2. 60); Bion of Borysthenes was one of a number of third-century ‘philosophers’ whose ideas were disseminated in moralizing sermons. But no Greek lay behind theSatiresas Archilochus lay behind theEpodes:their model was Lucilius, and Horace treated the relationship in three of theSatires. In each he uses the concept of an attack on himself as a framework in which to express his ideas. In i. 4 he defends the aggressiveness of satire by reference to Lucilius (whose style he criticizes) and asserts a general social and moral function for satire; the latter he illustrates by the analogy of his own father’s moral instruction (this gives a deeply personal touch to the satire). In i. 10 he uses supposed criticism of his own stylistic criticism of Lucilius as a framework for discussing his
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Title: Satires
Description:
The title is uncertain.
Horace usessaturagenerically in ii.
1.
1 andsaturaein ii.
6.
17, but elsewhere he uses the wordsermones, which Porphyrio asserts was the title of the work.
This name best reflects the conversational style and structure.
The Greek background to theSatiresHorace expressed when he described them asBionei sermones (Epist.
ii.
2.
60); Bion of Borysthenes was one of a number of third-century ‘philosophers’ whose ideas were disseminated in moralizing sermons.
But no Greek lay behind theSatiresas Archilochus lay behind theEpodes:their model was Lucilius, and Horace treated the relationship in three of theSatires.
In each he uses the concept of an attack on himself as a framework in which to express his ideas.
In i.
4 he defends the aggressiveness of satire by reference to Lucilius (whose style he criticizes) and asserts a general social and moral function for satire; the latter he illustrates by the analogy of his own father’s moral instruction (this gives a deeply personal touch to the satire).
In i.
10 he uses supposed criticism of his own stylistic criticism of Lucilius as a framework for discussing his.

Related Results

Text, Image, and the Performance of Satire
Text, Image, and the Performance of Satire
Abstract This chapter considers the relationship between text and image in De Hooghe’s satires: how it functions and what it tells us about how the satires were prod...
Rendre raison des épithètes de Boileau : procès et redynamisation satirique
Rendre raison des épithètes de Boileau : procès et redynamisation satirique
Cet article propose de revenir sur les paradoxes de l’épithète dans les Satires de Boileau. Dans cette optique, nous considérerons d’abord les positions explicites que tient le sat...
Conclusion
Conclusion
Abstract This concluding chapter focuses on the question of circulation and impact: to what extent did De Hooghe’s satires travel beyond The Netherlands in the seven...
Satires on Foreign Subjects
Satires on Foreign Subjects
Abstract This chapter examines seven of De Hooghe’s eighteen satires on the events surrounding William III’s invasion of England and associated diplomatic and milita...
Epistles
Epistles
Horace never uses epistulae of these poems; but seems to include them in the term sermones. However, evidence of MSS. and scholiasts is unanimous that the title given by the author...
Juvenal Satires Book 5
Juvenal Satires Book 5
A new text is printed of Juvenal’s final four satires, based on the most recent scholarship on the textual transmission, accompanied by a full apparatus criticus at the foot of eac...
Judging Jonson: Ben Jonson's Satirical Self-Defense in Poetaster
Judging Jonson: Ben Jonson's Satirical Self-Defense in Poetaster
This essay argues that Ben Jonson's antagonism with his audience in the comical satires was at least in part related to his translation of the satirist to the theater. Whereas prin...
The Kirk Satires and Kirk Politics
The Kirk Satires and Kirk Politics
Abstract This chapter revisits Burns’s early ‘kirk satires’ in the context of religious life in the poet’s own day and in relation to later critical readings of the ...

Back to Top