Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Bacterial inhibition efficiency of prilocaine and bupivacaine

View through CrossRef
AbstractThis study aimed to demonstrate the antibacterial effects of bupivacaine and prilocaine on Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In our study, the in vitro antimicrobial effects of 20 mg/mL prilocaine and 5 mg/mL bupivacaine were tested against a S. aureus American‐type culture collection (ATCC) 29213, P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853, and E. coli ATCC 25922, divided into Group P (Prilocaine) and Group B (Bupivacaine), respectively. S. aureus ATCC 29213, P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853, and E. coli ATCC 25922 were cultured on Mueller Hinton agar (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) plates for 18 to 24 hours at 37°C. In terms of inhibition zone diameters, inhibition of S. aureus ATCC 29213 was observed in both groups at the 12th and 24th hours. The 12th‐ and 24th‐hour S. aureus ATCC 29213 value was significantly higher in Group P compared with Group B (P = .008). At the 12th and 24th hours, inhibition of E. coli ATCC 25922 was observed in both groups. The 12th‐ and 24th‐hour E. coli ATCC 25922 value was significantly higher in Group P compared with Group B (P = .008). In our study, it was seen that prilocaine and bupivacaine had an antimicrobial effect on S. aureus and E. coli. In the comparison between these two local anesthetics (LAs), this effect was found to be significantly higher in prilocaine than bupivacaine. Therefore, we are of the opinion that antimicrobial effect potentials should also be taken into account in the selection of an LA agent in order to prevent the complications of an infection that might develop during LA infiltration and might lead to serious morbidity.
Title: Bacterial inhibition efficiency of prilocaine and bupivacaine
Description:
AbstractThis study aimed to demonstrate the antibacterial effects of bupivacaine and prilocaine on Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
In our study, the in vitro antimicrobial effects of 20 mg/mL prilocaine and 5 mg/mL bupivacaine were tested against a S.
aureus American‐type culture collection (ATCC) 29213, P.
aeruginosa ATCC 27853, and E.
coli ATCC 25922, divided into Group P (Prilocaine) and Group B (Bupivacaine), respectively.
S.
aureus ATCC 29213, P.
aeruginosa ATCC 27853, and E.
coli ATCC 25922 were cultured on Mueller Hinton agar (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) plates for 18 to 24 hours at 37°C.
In terms of inhibition zone diameters, inhibition of S.
aureus ATCC 29213 was observed in both groups at the 12th and 24th hours.
The 12th‐ and 24th‐hour S.
aureus ATCC 29213 value was significantly higher in Group P compared with Group B (P = .
008).
At the 12th and 24th hours, inhibition of E.
coli ATCC 25922 was observed in both groups.
The 12th‐ and 24th‐hour E.
coli ATCC 25922 value was significantly higher in Group P compared with Group B (P = .
008).
In our study, it was seen that prilocaine and bupivacaine had an antimicrobial effect on S.
aureus and E.
coli.
In the comparison between these two local anesthetics (LAs), this effect was found to be significantly higher in prilocaine than bupivacaine.
Therefore, we are of the opinion that antimicrobial effect potentials should also be taken into account in the selection of an LA agent in order to prevent the complications of an infection that might develop during LA infiltration and might lead to serious morbidity.

Related Results

Enhancement of Analgesic Effect of Intrathecal Neostigmine and Clonidine on Bupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia
Enhancement of Analgesic Effect of Intrathecal Neostigmine and Clonidine on Bupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia
Background and Objectives Intrathecal administration of neostigmine has been shown to produce analgesia in both animals and humans. The concurrent administration ...
Postoperative skeletal pain
Postoperative skeletal pain
This thesis attempts to better understand postoperative skeletal pain, quantify its severity and provide directions for its improved treatment. Chapter 2 described the current cl...
Comparison of the Efficacy of Peri-Operative Use of Bupivacaine with Corticosteroids Versus Bupivacaine Alone in Lumbar Disc Disease Surgery
Comparison of the Efficacy of Peri-Operative Use of Bupivacaine with Corticosteroids Versus Bupivacaine Alone in Lumbar Disc Disease Surgery
Objectives:  To compare the efficacy of peri-operative use of bupivacaine with corticosteroids versus bupivacaine alone in lumbar disc disease surgery. Materials and Methods:  This...
Sterility and concentration of liposomal bupivacaine single‐use vial when used in a multiple‐dose manner
Sterility and concentration of liposomal bupivacaine single‐use vial when used in a multiple‐dose manner
AbstractObjectiveTo evaluate the sterility of bupivacaine liposome injectable suspension (Nocita®) used in a multiple‐dose fashion for 5 days.Study designTriplicate liposomal bupiv...
Prilocaine Fentanyl versus Bupivacaine-Fentanyl in Subarachnoid Anesthesia for Lower Abdominal Surgeries
Prilocaine Fentanyl versus Bupivacaine-Fentanyl in Subarachnoid Anesthesia for Lower Abdominal Surgeries
Introduction and aim: Spinal anesthesia is a commonly and conveniently used for lower abdominal surgeries. The research on different drugs for spinal anesthesia is still ongoing to...

Back to Top