Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Comparing MEG and EEG measurement set-ups for a brain–computer interface based on selective auditory attention

View through CrossRef
Abstract Auditory attention modulates auditory evoked responses to target vs. non-target sounds in electro- and magnetoencephalographic (EEG/MEG) recordings. Employing whole-scalp MEG recordings and offline classification algorithms has been shown to enable high accuracy in tracking the target of auditory attention. Here, we investigated the decrease in accuracy when moving from the whole-scalp MEG to lower channel count EEG recordings and when training the classifier only from the initial part of the recording instead of extracting training samples throughout the recording. To this end, we recorded simultaneous MEG (306 channels) and EEG (64 channels) in 18 healthy volunteers while they were presented with concurrent streams of spoken “Yes”/”No” words and instructed to attend to one of them. We then trained support vector machine classifiers for predicting the target of attention from unaveraged trials of MEG/EEG. Classifiers were trained either on 204 MEG gradiometers or on EEG with 64, 30, 9 or 3 channels and with samples extracted randomly across or only from the beginning of the recording. The highest classification accuracy, 73% on average across the subjects for 1.0-s trials, was obtained with MEG when the training samples were randomly extracted throughout the recording. With EEG, the accuracies were 69%, 69%, 67%, and 63% when using 64, 30, 9, and 3 channels, respectively. When training the classifiers with the same amount of data but extracted only from the beginning of the recording, the accuracy dropped by 12 %-units on average, causing the result from the 3-channel EEG to fall below the chance level. Combining five consecutive trials partially compensated for this drop such that it was 1–8 %-units. While moving from whole-scalp MEG to EEG reduces classification accuracy, a usable auditory-attention-based brain-computer interfaces can be implemented with a small set of optimally-placed EEG channels.
Title: Comparing MEG and EEG measurement set-ups for a brain–computer interface based on selective auditory attention
Description:
Abstract Auditory attention modulates auditory evoked responses to target vs.
non-target sounds in electro- and magnetoencephalographic (EEG/MEG) recordings.
Employing whole-scalp MEG recordings and offline classification algorithms has been shown to enable high accuracy in tracking the target of auditory attention.
Here, we investigated the decrease in accuracy when moving from the whole-scalp MEG to lower channel count EEG recordings and when training the classifier only from the initial part of the recording instead of extracting training samples throughout the recording.
To this end, we recorded simultaneous MEG (306 channels) and EEG (64 channels) in 18 healthy volunteers while they were presented with concurrent streams of spoken “Yes”/”No” words and instructed to attend to one of them.
We then trained support vector machine classifiers for predicting the target of attention from unaveraged trials of MEG/EEG.
Classifiers were trained either on 204 MEG gradiometers or on EEG with 64, 30, 9 or 3 channels and with samples extracted randomly across or only from the beginning of the recording.
The highest classification accuracy, 73% on average across the subjects for 1.
0-s trials, was obtained with MEG when the training samples were randomly extracted throughout the recording.
With EEG, the accuracies were 69%, 69%, 67%, and 63% when using 64, 30, 9, and 3 channels, respectively.
When training the classifiers with the same amount of data but extracted only from the beginning of the recording, the accuracy dropped by 12 %-units on average, causing the result from the 3-channel EEG to fall below the chance level.
Combining five consecutive trials partially compensated for this drop such that it was 1–8 %-units.
While moving from whole-scalp MEG to EEG reduces classification accuracy, a usable auditory-attention-based brain-computer interfaces can be implemented with a small set of optimally-placed EEG channels.

Related Results

Brain Organoids, the Path Forward?
Brain Organoids, the Path Forward?
Photo by Maxim Berg on Unsplash INTRODUCTION The brain is one of the most foundational parts of being human, and we are still learning about what makes humans unique. Advancements ...
Event-Wise Stability of Patient-Specific EEG-MEG Deep Learning Spike Detection in Clinical MEG
Event-Wise Stability of Patient-Specific EEG-MEG Deep Learning Spike Detection in Clinical MEG
Abstract Objective Computational magnetoencephalography (MEG) interictal epileptiform discharge (IED) detectors have mainly use...
Emergence of synchronous EEG spindles from asynchronous MEG spindles
Emergence of synchronous EEG spindles from asynchronous MEG spindles
AbstractSleep spindles are bursts of rhythmic 10–15 Hz activity, lasting ∼0.5–2 s, that occur during Stage 2 sleep. They are coherent across multiple cortical and thalamic location...
Auditory-GAN: deep learning framework for improved auditory spatial attention detection
Auditory-GAN: deep learning framework for improved auditory spatial attention detection
Recent advances in auditory attention detection from multichannel electroencephalography (EEG) signals encounter the challenges of the scarcity of available online EEG data and the...
Test-retest reliability of auditory MMN measured with OPM-MEG
Test-retest reliability of auditory MMN measured with OPM-MEG
Abstract In this paper, we report results from an investigation of auditory mismatch responses as measured by magnetoencephalography (MEG) based on optically pumped...
Evaluation of Mathematical Cognitive Functions with the Use of EEG Brain Imaging
Evaluation of Mathematical Cognitive Functions with the Use of EEG Brain Imaging
During the last decades, the interest displayed in neurocognitive and brain science research is relatively high. In this chapter, the cognitive neuroscience field approach focuses ...
[RETRACTED] Gro-X Brain Reviews - Is Gro-X Brain A Scam? v1
[RETRACTED] Gro-X Brain Reviews - Is Gro-X Brain A Scam? v1
[RETRACTED]➢Item Name - Gro-X Brain➢ Creation - Natural Organic Compound➢ Incidental Effects - NA➢ Accessibility - Online➢ Rating - ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐➢ Click Here To Visit - Official Website - ...

Back to Top