Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Evaluation of phosphonate fungicides for management of leaf spot diseases of peanut in Georgia

View through CrossRef
Efficacy of phosphonate fungicides (FRAC Group P 07) and micronized elemental sulfur (FRAC Group M 02) for control of early leaf spot (Passalora arachidicola) and late leaf spot (Nothopassalora personata) of peanut (Arachis hypogaea) was evaluated in five field experiments in Tifton, GA between 2021 and 2025. Treatments included phosphonate (2 kg a.i. ha-1) and sulfur (2.7 kg a.i. ha-1) fungicides applied individually and in tank-mix combinations, as well as chlorothalonil (1.26 kg a.i. ha-1) (FRAC Group M 05), a standard protectant fungicide, and a nontreated control. Final leaf spot severity and standardized area under the disease progress curve (sAUDPC) were lower for both the phosphonate alone and sulfur alone treatments than for the nontreated control but were higher than for the chlorothalonil standard. Final ratings for leaf spot severity and sAUDPC were lower for the phosphonate + sulfur mixtures than for any other treatment. For effects on final defoliation, effects of the phosphonate + sulfur mixture were greater than additive. In vitro experiments indicated that the phosphonate fungicide had no effect on germination of conidia of either pathogen but reduced biomass development of both Passalora arachidicola and N. personata by 60% after conidial germination. These results indicate that the combination of a phosphonate fungicide with micronized elemental sulfur can be an effective treatment for management of leaf spot and could be used as replacement for chlorothalonil for leaf spot control.
Title: Evaluation of phosphonate fungicides for management of leaf spot diseases of peanut in Georgia
Description:
Efficacy of phosphonate fungicides (FRAC Group P 07) and micronized elemental sulfur (FRAC Group M 02) for control of early leaf spot (Passalora arachidicola) and late leaf spot (Nothopassalora personata) of peanut (Arachis hypogaea) was evaluated in five field experiments in Tifton, GA between 2021 and 2025.
Treatments included phosphonate (2 kg a.
i.
ha-1) and sulfur (2.
7 kg a.
i.
ha-1) fungicides applied individually and in tank-mix combinations, as well as chlorothalonil (1.
26 kg a.
i.
ha-1) (FRAC Group M 05), a standard protectant fungicide, and a nontreated control.
Final leaf spot severity and standardized area under the disease progress curve (sAUDPC) were lower for both the phosphonate alone and sulfur alone treatments than for the nontreated control but were higher than for the chlorothalonil standard.
Final ratings for leaf spot severity and sAUDPC were lower for the phosphonate + sulfur mixtures than for any other treatment.
For effects on final defoliation, effects of the phosphonate + sulfur mixture were greater than additive.
In vitro experiments indicated that the phosphonate fungicide had no effect on germination of conidia of either pathogen but reduced biomass development of both Passalora arachidicola and N.
personata by 60% after conidial germination.
These results indicate that the combination of a phosphonate fungicide with micronized elemental sulfur can be an effective treatment for management of leaf spot and could be used as replacement for chlorothalonil for leaf spot control.

Related Results

Impact of Pesticides on Crop Injury, Yield, Market Quality, and Chemical Composition of Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)
Impact of Pesticides on Crop Injury, Yield, Market Quality, and Chemical Composition of Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)
Producing peanut with limited pest management options creates challenges in maintaining yield, market grade quality, acceptable flavor, and nutritional value of peanut (Arachis hyp...
Determinació de fungicides en pells i en banys de procés del sector adober
Determinació de fungicides en pells i en banys de procés del sector adober
This thesis is based on the development and validation of two analytical methods to determine fungicides commonly used in the tanning industry and other alternative. One of the met...
Peanut Response to Postemergence Applications of Chlorimuron
Peanut Response to Postemergence Applications of Chlorimuron
Abstract There has been a renewed interest in the use of chlorimuron to control late-season Florida beggarweed in peanut. Postemergence (POST...
Leaf Spot Disease Development and Its Effect on Yield of Essential Oil-Producing Hemp Cultivars in Kentucky
Leaf Spot Disease Development and Its Effect on Yield of Essential Oil-Producing Hemp Cultivars in Kentucky
Leaf spot diseases are common on field hemp, causing defoliation, and blighting. The most prevalent leaf spot diseases of hemp in Kentucky are Bipolaris leaf spot (Bipolaris gigant...
Combination of Early Maturity and Leaf Spot Tolerance Within an Advanced Georgia Peanut Breeding Line1
Combination of Early Maturity and Leaf Spot Tolerance Within an Advanced Georgia Peanut Breeding Line1
Abstract In the past, genetic resistance to both early and late leaf spots [Cercospora arachidicola Hori and Cercosporidiumpersonatum (Berk. & Curt.) Deighton] h...
Functional Uses of Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Seed Storage Proteins
Functional Uses of Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Seed Storage Proteins
Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) is an important grain legume crop of tropics and subtropics. It is increasingly being accepted as a functional food and protein extender in developing ...
Effect of Bradyrhizobia Inoculant Formulation with Phorate in New Peanut Fields
Effect of Bradyrhizobia Inoculant Formulation with Phorate in New Peanut Fields
ABSTRACT Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) is a legume and requires nodulation by Bradyrhizobia to convert atmospheric N into a plant usable form. Peanut inoculants pl...

Back to Top