Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Independent Monitoring Mechanism for the Pandemic Accord: Accountability for a safer world

View through CrossRef
To address the challenges in pandemic preparedness and response (PPR), the World Health Assembly (WHA), at a special session in November 2021, established an Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (the INB) and tasked it with drafting a new legal instrument for PPR. During its second meeting in July 2022, the INB decided to develop the accord under Article 19 of the WHO Constitution, which grants the WHO the authority to negotiate a legally-binding Convention or Agreement and requires ratification by countries according to their local laws to enter into force. The aim is to complete negotiations and adopt a new pandemic instrument at the WHA in May 2024. The new legally binding agreement aims to address many of the failures exposed by the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the adoption of such an agreement is not the end of the process but the beginning. The negotiations on the instrument must establish a mechanism to monitor countries' compliance with the accord, particularly on the legally-binding elements. In this paper, we recommend creating such a mechanism as part of the accord: an independent committee of experts that monitors state parties' compliance with the pandemic accord and the timeliness, completeness, and robustness of states’ reports on their obligations. Its primary purpose would be to verify state self-reports by triangulating them with a range of publicly available information, making direct inquiries, and accepting confidential submissions. It would report its findings to a body consisting of or that is directly accountable to heads of state, with a particular focus on elevating instances of non-compliance or inadequate reporting. Its reports would also be available to the public. The proposed design builds on the analysis of strengths and weaknesses of existing monitoring approaches to 11 international treaties and mechanisms within and outside of health, a review of the literature, and interviews and input from more than 40 experts from around the world.
United Nations University International Institute of Global Health
Title: Independent Monitoring Mechanism for the Pandemic Accord: Accountability for a safer world
Description:
To address the challenges in pandemic preparedness and response (PPR), the World Health Assembly (WHA), at a special session in November 2021, established an Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (the INB) and tasked it with drafting a new legal instrument for PPR.
During its second meeting in July 2022, the INB decided to develop the accord under Article 19 of the WHO Constitution, which grants the WHO the authority to negotiate a legally-binding Convention or Agreement and requires ratification by countries according to their local laws to enter into force.
The aim is to complete negotiations and adopt a new pandemic instrument at the WHA in May 2024.
The new legally binding agreement aims to address many of the failures exposed by the COVID-19 pandemic.
However, the adoption of such an agreement is not the end of the process but the beginning.
The negotiations on the instrument must establish a mechanism to monitor countries' compliance with the accord, particularly on the legally-binding elements.
In this paper, we recommend creating such a mechanism as part of the accord: an independent committee of experts that monitors state parties' compliance with the pandemic accord and the timeliness, completeness, and robustness of states’ reports on their obligations.
Its primary purpose would be to verify state self-reports by triangulating them with a range of publicly available information, making direct inquiries, and accepting confidential submissions.
It would report its findings to a body consisting of or that is directly accountable to heads of state, with a particular focus on elevating instances of non-compliance or inadequate reporting.
Its reports would also be available to the public.
The proposed design builds on the analysis of strengths and weaknesses of existing monitoring approaches to 11 international treaties and mechanisms within and outside of health, a review of the literature, and interviews and input from more than 40 experts from around the world.

Related Results

Brokiga förhållanden av ansvar: Om konstruktioner av ansvarsförhållanden i samverkansprojekt
Brokiga förhållanden av ansvar: Om konstruktioner av ansvarsförhållanden i samverkansprojekt
Over the past few decades, accountability has become a central concept in the study of the public sector. However, the concept has proven to be difficult to translate into various ...
Educational e-accountability: Lessons for Zimbabwe's educational accountability system
Educational e-accountability: Lessons for Zimbabwe's educational accountability system
Background: Zimbabwe still relies on a traditional educational accountability system that can no longer cope with new pressures for educational accountability in the face of changi...
Accountability in Humanitarian Action
Accountability in Humanitarian Action
Abstract Although a growing number of NGOs are combining humanitarian and development activities, it was long the case that humanitarian action was isolated from dis...
Towards Understanding Accountability for Physicians Practice in India
Towards Understanding Accountability for Physicians Practice in India
Abstract The lack of accountability is considered to be a major cause of the crisis in health care in India. Physicians as key stakeholders in the health care delivery syst...
Sources of accountability inside the boardroom
Sources of accountability inside the boardroom
Purpose Despite indications of scholarly interest, there are still gaps in the research of the concept of felt accountability, especially the felt accountability of board members. ...
Preserving Community in Health Care
Preserving Community in Health Care
There are two prominent trends in health care today: first, increasing demands for accountability, and second, increasing provision of care through managed care organizations. Thes...
Social networks, corruption and institutions of accounting, auditing and accountability
Social networks, corruption and institutions of accounting, auditing and accountability
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate institutions of accountability in Zambia in order to understand how social networks may influence such institutions not to disch...
Dimensions of Accountability: Voices from New Zealand Primary Health Organisations
Dimensions of Accountability: Voices from New Zealand Primary Health Organisations
<p>Cooperative activity necessitates participants acknowledging joint goals, often delegating resources, consequent performance, tailored accountability reporting and feedbac...

Back to Top