Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Preserving Community in Health Care
View through CrossRef
There are two prominent trends in health care today: first, increasing demands for accountability, and second, increasing provision of care through managed care organizations. These trends promote the question: What form of accountability is appropriate to managed care plans? Accountability is the process by which a party justifies its actions and policies. Components of accountability include parties that can be held or hold others accountable, domains and content areas being assessed, and procedures of assessment.Traditionally, the professional model of accountability has operated in medical care. In this model, physicians establish the standards of accountability and hold each other accountable through professional organizations. This form of accountability seems outdated and inapplicable to managed care plans. The alternatives are the economic and the political models of accountability. In the economic model, medicine becomes more like a commodity, and “exit” (consumers changing providers for reasons of cost and quality) is the dominant procedure of accountability. In the political model, medicine becomes more like a community good, and “voice” (citizens communicating their views in public forums or on policy committees, or in elections for representatives) is the dominant procedure of accountability.The economic model’s advantages affirm American individualism, make minimal demands on consumers, and use a powerful incentive, money. Its disadvantages undermine health care as a nonmarket good, undermine individual autonomy, undermine good medical practice, impose significant demands on consumers to be informed, sustain differentials of power, and use indirect procedures of accountability.The political model’s advantages affirm health care as a matter of justice, permit selecting domains other than price and quality for accountability, reinforce good medical practice, and equalize power between patients and physicians. Its disadvantages include inefficiency in decision making, capture by extremists or experts, intractable value conflicts, fragmentation of community, and oppression of minorities.The political model is the model we should endorse. Its disadvantages can be minimized by proper institutional design. In addition, recent research on managed care plans suggests that the political model may be the best for a competitive marketplace because it can ensure that tough allocation decisions are addressed and improve health through changes in nonmedical aspects of community life.
Duke University Press
Title: Preserving Community in Health Care
Description:
There are two prominent trends in health care today: first, increasing demands for accountability, and second, increasing provision of care through managed care organizations.
These trends promote the question: What form of accountability is appropriate to managed care plans? Accountability is the process by which a party justifies its actions and policies.
Components of accountability include parties that can be held or hold others accountable, domains and content areas being assessed, and procedures of assessment.
Traditionally, the professional model of accountability has operated in medical care.
In this model, physicians establish the standards of accountability and hold each other accountable through professional organizations.
This form of accountability seems outdated and inapplicable to managed care plans.
The alternatives are the economic and the political models of accountability.
In the economic model, medicine becomes more like a commodity, and “exit” (consumers changing providers for reasons of cost and quality) is the dominant procedure of accountability.
In the political model, medicine becomes more like a community good, and “voice” (citizens communicating their views in public forums or on policy committees, or in elections for representatives) is the dominant procedure of accountability.
The economic model’s advantages affirm American individualism, make minimal demands on consumers, and use a powerful incentive, money.
Its disadvantages undermine health care as a nonmarket good, undermine individual autonomy, undermine good medical practice, impose significant demands on consumers to be informed, sustain differentials of power, and use indirect procedures of accountability.
The political model’s advantages affirm health care as a matter of justice, permit selecting domains other than price and quality for accountability, reinforce good medical practice, and equalize power between patients and physicians.
Its disadvantages include inefficiency in decision making, capture by extremists or experts, intractable value conflicts, fragmentation of community, and oppression of minorities.
The political model is the model we should endorse.
Its disadvantages can be minimized by proper institutional design.
In addition, recent research on managed care plans suggests that the political model may be the best for a competitive marketplace because it can ensure that tough allocation decisions are addressed and improve health through changes in nonmedical aspects of community life.
Related Results
Towards more goal-oriented care through care coordination and care planning.
Towards more goal-oriented care through care coordination and care planning.
The increasing aging of our society is putting increasing pressure on the current organization of care and support. This moved the Flemish government to a thorough reform of primar...
Burden of the Beast
Burden of the Beast
Introduction
Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, and its fluctuating waves of infections and the emergence of new variants, Indigenous populations in Australia and worldwide have re...
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Abstract
Introduction
Hospitals are high-risk environments for infections. Despite the global recognition of these pathogens, few studies compare microorganisms from community-acqu...
Editorial for the special issue in Nordic Journal of Health Economics: Challenges in Nordic Primary Care
Editorial for the special issue in Nordic Journal of Health Economics: Challenges in Nordic Primary Care
Primary care in the Nordic countries have many similarities but are also different in crucial ways (Olsen et al. 2016). Among the similarities are that Nordic primary care is tax-b...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash
Abstract
This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The UP Manila Health Policy Development Hub recognizes the invaluable contribution of the participants in theseries of roundtable discussions listed below:
RTD: Beyond Hospit...
5.H. Round table: Health care systems, health service provision, and equity in health
5.H. Round table: Health care systems, health service provision, and equity in health
Abstract
The starting point for this round table is the observation that the research areas of health systems, health services...
Ehealth Communication
Ehealth Communication
Ehealth, also known as E-health, is a relatively new area of health communication inquiry that examines the development, implementation, and application of a broad range of evolvin...

