Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Analisis Perbandingan Teknik Video Codec H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, VP9 dan AV1

View through CrossRef
Video applications consume more energy on the Internet and can be accessed by electronic devices, due to an increase in the consumption of high-resolution and high-quality video content, presenting serious issues to delivery infrastructure that needs higher video compression technologies. The focus of this paper is to evaluate the quality of the most current codec, AV1, to its predecessor codec. The comparison was made experimentally at two video resolutions (1080p and 720p) by sampling video frames with various CRF/CQP values and testing several parameters analyses such as encoding duration, compression ratio, bit rate, Mean Square Error (MSE), and Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR). The AV1 codec is very great in terms of quality and file size, even though it is slower in terms of compression speed. The H.265/HEVC codec, on the other side, beats the other codec in terms of compression ratio. In conclusion, the H.265/HEVC codec is suggested as a material for obtaining a well compressed video with small file size and a short time.
Title: Analisis Perbandingan Teknik Video Codec H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, VP9 dan AV1
Description:
Video applications consume more energy on the Internet and can be accessed by electronic devices, due to an increase in the consumption of high-resolution and high-quality video content, presenting serious issues to delivery infrastructure that needs higher video compression technologies.
The focus of this paper is to evaluate the quality of the most current codec, AV1, to its predecessor codec.
The comparison was made experimentally at two video resolutions (1080p and 720p) by sampling video frames with various CRF/CQP values and testing several parameters analyses such as encoding duration, compression ratio, bit rate, Mean Square Error (MSE), and Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR).
The AV1 codec is very great in terms of quality and file size, even though it is slower in terms of compression speed.
The H.
265/HEVC codec, on the other side, beats the other codec in terms of compression ratio.
In conclusion, the H.
265/HEVC codec is suggested as a material for obtaining a well compressed video with small file size and a short time.

Related Results

Content-Adaptive Codec Selection Between AV1 and H.264: A Controlled Case Study of Bandwidth Savings Versus Latency at Matched Quality
Content-Adaptive Codec Selection Between AV1 and H.264: A Controlled Case Study of Bandwidth Savings Versus Latency at Matched Quality
AV1 often reduces bitrate relative to H.264/AVC, but the gain is operationally useful only when the extra computation does not violate live-encoding constraints. This paper present...
Knowledge, attitude and perception of stroke : a population-based survey in Lebanon
Knowledge, attitude and perception of stroke : a population-based survey in Lebanon
Connaissance, attitude et perception (CAP) des accidents vasculaires cérébraux : une étude sur la population libanaise Objectifs : Au Liban, l'AVC est considéré com...
Participation sociale et représentations de l’Accident Vasculaire Cérébral (AVC) chez des patients suite à un AVC
Participation sociale et représentations de l’Accident Vasculaire Cérébral (AVC) chez des patients suite à un AVC
L’Accident Vasculaire Cérébral (AVC) est une pathologie fréquente et grave, constituant la première cause de handicap acquis chez l’adulte. Le retentissement de l’AVC sur le quotid...
Efficient Coding Unit and Mode Decision Algorithm for HEVC Intra Prediction
Efficient Coding Unit and Mode Decision Algorithm for HEVC Intra Prediction
High efficiency video coding (HEVC) is the state-of-the-art video coding standard and better than the previous video coding standard H.264/AVC on coding efficiency. Under the simil...

Back to Top