Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Enhanced Degree of Monomer Conversion of Orthodontic Adhesives Using a Glass-Fiber Layer under the Bracket

View through CrossRef
Abstract Objective: To test the hypothesis that there is no difference in the degree of conversion (DC%) of orthodontic composites during the light-curing process with or without the use of a glass-fiber reinforcement. Materials and Methods: Two light-curing orthodontic adhesives, Transbond XT (TB) and Beauty Ortho Bond (BO), were used with woven preimpregnated glass fibers. The degree of monomer conversion was determined for both adhesives in three settings (n = 5 per group): in the first group, the adhesive was cured without a bracket (control); in the second group, the bracket was bonded using adhesive without fiber reinforcement; and in the third group, a layer of glass-fiber net was added between the bracket and resin. The adhesive resin was light cured, and the DC% was determined by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Results: A two-way analysis of variance revealed significant differences in the DC% (P < .001) between adhesives and between the fiber-reinforced and nonreinforced groups. When the nonreinforced adhesives were light cured under the brackets, the DC% was significantly lower (TB: 37.0%, SD 3.4; BO: 36.9%, SD 1.9) compared with the control (TB: 54.7%, SD 0.6; BO: 65.9%, SD 0.5). A higher DC% was found when the resin was light cured in the presence of a glass-fiber net (TB: 44.1%, SD 0.3; BO: 55.3%, SD 1.7). Conclusion: The hypothesis is rejected. The degree of monomer conversion of the light-curing adhesive resin under stainless steel bracket can be improved by adding a thin layer of glass-fiber–reinforced composite between the bracket and adhesive resin.
Title: Enhanced Degree of Monomer Conversion of Orthodontic Adhesives Using a Glass-Fiber Layer under the Bracket
Description:
Abstract Objective: To test the hypothesis that there is no difference in the degree of conversion (DC%) of orthodontic composites during the light-curing process with or without the use of a glass-fiber reinforcement.
Materials and Methods: Two light-curing orthodontic adhesives, Transbond XT (TB) and Beauty Ortho Bond (BO), were used with woven preimpregnated glass fibers.
The degree of monomer conversion was determined for both adhesives in three settings (n = 5 per group): in the first group, the adhesive was cured without a bracket (control); in the second group, the bracket was bonded using adhesive without fiber reinforcement; and in the third group, a layer of glass-fiber net was added between the bracket and resin.
The adhesive resin was light cured, and the DC% was determined by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy.
Results: A two-way analysis of variance revealed significant differences in the DC% (P < .
001) between adhesives and between the fiber-reinforced and nonreinforced groups.
When the nonreinforced adhesives were light cured under the brackets, the DC% was significantly lower (TB: 37.
0%, SD 3.
4; BO: 36.
9%, SD 1.
9) compared with the control (TB: 54.
7%, SD 0.
6; BO: 65.
9%, SD 0.
5).
A higher DC% was found when the resin was light cured in the presence of a glass-fiber net (TB: 44.
1%, SD 0.
3; BO: 55.
3%, SD 1.
7).
Conclusion: The hypothesis is rejected.
The degree of monomer conversion of the light-curing adhesive resin under stainless steel bracket can be improved by adding a thin layer of glass-fiber–reinforced composite between the bracket and adhesive resin.

Related Results

Perception of Dental Caries Risk and Prevention among Orthodontic Patients – A Cross-Sectional Survey
Perception of Dental Caries Risk and Prevention among Orthodontic Patients – A Cross-Sectional Survey
Aim: To investigate the perception of dental caries risk and prevention among patients undergoing orthodontic treatment and to assess the influence of the oral hygiene information ...
Fluorescence-aided removal of orthodontic composites: an in vivo comparative study
Fluorescence-aided removal of orthodontic composites: an in vivo comparative study
Abstract Background To compare the fluorescent properties of 6 different orthodontic adhesives and provide useful information for clinicians in the ...
CD301b+ macrophages: a new target for improving the efficiency of orthodontic treatment under mild inflammation
CD301b+ macrophages: a new target for improving the efficiency of orthodontic treatment under mild inflammation
Abstract With improvements in the quality of life and the demand for aesthetics, more and more people are opting for orthodontic treatment, resulting in a surge in adult or...
Generalization of Nambu–Hamilton Equation and Extension of Nambu–Poisson Bracket to Superspace
Generalization of Nambu–Hamilton Equation and Extension of Nambu–Poisson Bracket to Superspace
We propose a generalization of the Nambu–Hamilton equation in superspace R 3 | 2 with three real and two Grassmann coordinates. We construct the even degree vector field ...
Generalization of Nambu-Hamilton Equation and Extension of Nambu-Poisson Bracket to Superspace
Generalization of Nambu-Hamilton Equation and Extension of Nambu-Poisson Bracket to Superspace
We propose a generalization of Nambu-Hamilton equation in superspace $\mathbb R^{3|2}$ with three real and two Grassmann coordinates. We construct the even degree vector field in t...
Is orthodontic research falling prey to obscure and predatory journals? A bibliometric study
Is orthodontic research falling prey to obscure and predatory journals? A bibliometric study
Abstract Aims To evaluate where orthodontic research papers are published and to explore potential relationships between the jou...
Quantitative and qualitative analyses of orthodontic-related videos on YouTube
Quantitative and qualitative analyses of orthodontic-related videos on YouTube
ABSTRACT Objectives To investigate content of orthodontic-related videos on YouTube to improve the understanding of orthodontic ...

Back to Top