Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Fluorescence-aided removal of orthodontic composites: an in vivo comparative study

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background To compare the fluorescent properties of 6 different orthodontic adhesives and provide useful information for clinicians in the adhesion choice, in order to remove it easily at the end of orthodontic treatment by using the Fluorescence-aided Identification Technique (FIT). Methods Six orthodontic adhesives were included: Ortho Connect, Gradia LoFlo A3.5, Greengloo, Transbond XT, KommonBase Pink, and KommonBase Clear. The same thermoformed template with 1 mm shell thickness on the six anterior teeth was used for adhesive positioning; furthermore, an ultraviolet light-emitting diode flashlight was used for the FIT. The brightness of adhesive area and tooth area (L* color coordinate) were measured on the photographs by using the “color picker” tool of Photoshop software. Results GC Ortho Connect, Gradia Direct LoFlo and KommonBase Clear showed the highest differences of brightness (15.5, 16.3 and 13.5, respectively), while Greengloo, Transbond XT and KommonBase Pink registered similar values between resin area and tooth area with FIT (− 0.5, − 0.8 and − 1.0, respectively). The high viscosity adhesive resins, as Greengloo and Transbond XT, showed a similar performance in terms of fluorescence to the KommonBase Pink, the lowest viscous resin adhesive considered. Conclusions The most used orthodontic adhesives showed different fluorescence properties. Some resins were brighter with the FIT, facilitating identification and subsequent removal. Other orthodontic adhesives presented no difference between adhesive and tooth. The viscosity of orthodontic adhesives did not influence the brightness emitted with FIT.
Title: Fluorescence-aided removal of orthodontic composites: an in vivo comparative study
Description:
Abstract Background To compare the fluorescent properties of 6 different orthodontic adhesives and provide useful information for clinicians in the adhesion choice, in order to remove it easily at the end of orthodontic treatment by using the Fluorescence-aided Identification Technique (FIT).
Methods Six orthodontic adhesives were included: Ortho Connect, Gradia LoFlo A3.
5, Greengloo, Transbond XT, KommonBase Pink, and KommonBase Clear.
The same thermoformed template with 1 mm shell thickness on the six anterior teeth was used for adhesive positioning; furthermore, an ultraviolet light-emitting diode flashlight was used for the FIT.
The brightness of adhesive area and tooth area (L* color coordinate) were measured on the photographs by using the “color picker” tool of Photoshop software.
Results GC Ortho Connect, Gradia Direct LoFlo and KommonBase Clear showed the highest differences of brightness (15.
5, 16.
3 and 13.
5, respectively), while Greengloo, Transbond XT and KommonBase Pink registered similar values between resin area and tooth area with FIT (− 0.
5, − 0.
8 and − 1.
0, respectively).
The high viscosity adhesive resins, as Greengloo and Transbond XT, showed a similar performance in terms of fluorescence to the KommonBase Pink, the lowest viscous resin adhesive considered.
Conclusions The most used orthodontic adhesives showed different fluorescence properties.
Some resins were brighter with the FIT, facilitating identification and subsequent removal.
Other orthodontic adhesives presented no difference between adhesive and tooth.
The viscosity of orthodontic adhesives did not influence the brightness emitted with FIT.

Related Results

Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Abstarct Introduction Isolated brain hydatid disease (BHD) is an extremely rare form of echinococcosis. A prompt and timely diagnosis is a crucial step in disease management. This ...
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
In a comprehensive and at times critical manner, this volume seeks to shed light on the development of events in Western (i.e., European and North American) comparative literature ...
Perception of Dental Caries Risk and Prevention among Orthodontic Patients – A Cross-Sectional Survey
Perception of Dental Caries Risk and Prevention among Orthodontic Patients – A Cross-Sectional Survey
Aim: To investigate the perception of dental caries risk and prevention among patients undergoing orthodontic treatment and to assess the influence of the oral hygiene information ...
CD301b+ macrophages: a new target for improving the efficiency of orthodontic treatment under mild inflammation
CD301b+ macrophages: a new target for improving the efficiency of orthodontic treatment under mild inflammation
Abstract With improvements in the quality of life and the demand for aesthetics, more and more people are opting for orthodontic treatment, resulting in a surge in adult or...
Quantitative and qualitative analyses of orthodontic-related videos on YouTube
Quantitative and qualitative analyses of orthodontic-related videos on YouTube
ABSTRACT Objectives To investigate content of orthodontic-related videos on YouTube to improve the understanding of orthodontic ...
Is orthodontic research falling prey to obscure and predatory journals? A bibliometric study
Is orthodontic research falling prey to obscure and predatory journals? A bibliometric study
Abstract Aims To evaluate where orthodontic research papers are published and to explore potential relationships between the jou...
PREVALENCE OF ANAEROBIC MICROBIOTA IN ORTHODONTIC PATIENTS – SCOPING REVIEW
PREVALENCE OF ANAEROBIC MICROBIOTA IN ORTHODONTIC PATIENTS – SCOPING REVIEW
Introduction: Various appliances used in orthodontic treatment behave as plaque retentive sites which can harbor anaerobic microorganisms and this may be associated with a worsenin...

Back to Top