Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Effect of Pre-Setting Exposure to 17% EDTA on Physicochemical and Surface Properties of AH Plus Bioceramic and AH Plus Endodontic Sealers

View through CrossRef
Background/Objectives: Residual EDTA may persist after smear-layer removal and after the application of contact sealers during setting. This in vitro study compared the effect of 1 min of pre-setting surface contact with 17% EDTA (vs. distilled water) on a calcium silicate-based sealer (AH Plus Bioceramic Sealer) and an epoxy resin-based sealer (AH Plus). Methods: Discs were prepared (N = 108) in a 2 × 2 design (n = 27/group); per group; n = 12 were used for solubility followed by eluate pH using the same specimens/eluates after 24 h immersion in distilled water; n = 12 were used to test Vickers microhardness on an independent set after setting; and n = 3 were used for SEM/EDS. Results: Data were analyzed at α = 0.05 using Kruskal–Wallis tests followed by Bonferroni-adjusted pairwise Mann–Whitney U tests for solubility and eluate pH, and one-way ANOVA was performed followed by Tukey’s post hoc test to assess the microhardness. Solubility differed among groups (p < 0.001) and was higher for the bioceramic sealer than for the resin sealer; pre-setting EDTA exposure increased solubility for the AH Plus Bioceramic Sealer (0.86 ± 0.08% to 1.30 ± 0.16%) and decreased solubility for AH Plus (0.34 ± 0.04% to 0.22 ± 0.03%) (p < 0.05). The eluate pH also differed among groups (p = 0.001) and was higher for the bioceramic sealer (≈11.7) than for the resin sealer (≈8.7–9.3), with no within-material differences (p = 0.999 and p = 0.851). Microhardness differed among groups (p < 0.001) and was higher for AH Plus (239.70–246.92 HV) than for AH Plus Bioceramic (131.72–170.83 HV); EDTA reduced microhardness only for the bioceramic sealer (p < 0.001), with no significant change for AH Plus (p = 0.475). Descriptive SEM/EDS findings suggested increased surface irregularities and lower surface Ca for AH Plus Bioceramic after EDTA exposure (12.68 to 7.31 wt%). Conclusions: Pre-setting EDTA contact therefore produced material-dependent changes in early properties and adverse surface-related effects in the calcium silicate-based sealer, supporting thorough chelator removal before obturation.
Title: Effect of Pre-Setting Exposure to 17% EDTA on Physicochemical and Surface Properties of AH Plus Bioceramic and AH Plus Endodontic Sealers
Description:
Background/Objectives: Residual EDTA may persist after smear-layer removal and after the application of contact sealers during setting.
This in vitro study compared the effect of 1 min of pre-setting surface contact with 17% EDTA (vs.
distilled water) on a calcium silicate-based sealer (AH Plus Bioceramic Sealer) and an epoxy resin-based sealer (AH Plus).
Methods: Discs were prepared (N = 108) in a 2 × 2 design (n = 27/group); per group; n = 12 were used for solubility followed by eluate pH using the same specimens/eluates after 24 h immersion in distilled water; n = 12 were used to test Vickers microhardness on an independent set after setting; and n = 3 were used for SEM/EDS.
Results: Data were analyzed at α = 0.
05 using Kruskal–Wallis tests followed by Bonferroni-adjusted pairwise Mann–Whitney U tests for solubility and eluate pH, and one-way ANOVA was performed followed by Tukey’s post hoc test to assess the microhardness.
Solubility differed among groups (p < 0.
001) and was higher for the bioceramic sealer than for the resin sealer; pre-setting EDTA exposure increased solubility for the AH Plus Bioceramic Sealer (0.
86 ± 0.
08% to 1.
30 ± 0.
16%) and decreased solubility for AH Plus (0.
34 ± 0.
04% to 0.
22 ± 0.
03%) (p < 0.
05).
The eluate pH also differed among groups (p = 0.
001) and was higher for the bioceramic sealer (≈11.
7) than for the resin sealer (≈8.
7–9.
3), with no within-material differences (p = 0.
999 and p = 0.
851).
Microhardness differed among groups (p < 0.
001) and was higher for AH Plus (239.
70–246.
92 HV) than for AH Plus Bioceramic (131.
72–170.
83 HV); EDTA reduced microhardness only for the bioceramic sealer (p < 0.
001), with no significant change for AH Plus (p = 0.
475).
Descriptive SEM/EDS findings suggested increased surface irregularities and lower surface Ca for AH Plus Bioceramic after EDTA exposure (12.
68 to 7.
31 wt%).
Conclusions: Pre-setting EDTA contact therefore produced material-dependent changes in early properties and adverse surface-related effects in the calcium silicate-based sealer, supporting thorough chelator removal before obturation.

Related Results

<b>Comparative Effectiveness of Bioceramic and Resin-Based Sealers in Root Canal Therapy: A Meta-Analysis</b>
<b>Comparative Effectiveness of Bioceramic and Resin-Based Sealers in Root Canal Therapy: A Meta-Analysis</b>
Background: Successful root canal therapy depends on effective disinfection, three-dimensional obturation, and durable sealing of the root canal system to prevent reinfection and s...
Comparative apical sealing evaluation of two bioceramic endodontic sealers
Comparative apical sealing evaluation of two bioceramic endodontic sealers
Aim. The current study aims to evaluate, using scanning electronic microscopy, the sealing ability of two bioceramic endodontic sealers, one consecrated and one experimental. Meth...
Clinical utility index for root canal sealers
Clinical utility index for root canal sealers
Abstract Background Effective endodontic treatment requires the use of a root canal sealer with optimal properties to ensure a hermetic seal, preven...
Calcium silicate sealers in endodontics
Calcium silicate sealers in endodontics
Introduction: Endodontic root canal sealers serve the purpose of providing a fluid-tight seal, sealing off accessory canals and multiple foramina, while comprehensively confining t...
Bioceramic materials in endodontics
Bioceramic materials in endodontics
During the past two decades, a number of major advances have been made in the field of bioactive ceramics used for endodontic treatment. This article reviews the physico‐chemical a...
Human Gingival Fibroblasts Response to Different Endodontic Sealers: An In Vitro Study
Human Gingival Fibroblasts Response to Different Endodontic Sealers: An In Vitro Study
Endodontic treatment aims to eliminate infection of the root canals and fill the dental pulp space. The biocompatibility studies of the sealers used in root canals obturation are c...
ผลของตัวคีเลตต่อการสะสมแคดเมียมของทานตะวัน Helianthus annuus Linn.
ผลของตัวคีเลตต่อการสะสมแคดเมียมของทานตะวัน Helianthus annuus Linn.
การศึกษาผลของคีเลตต่อการสะสมแคดเมียมของทานตะวัน (Helianthus annuus Linn.) โดยการปลูกทานตะวันในกระถางทดลองที่เติมสารละลายแคดเมียมไนเตรต (Cd(NO[subscript 3])[subscript 2]4H[subscript...
A Cross-Sectional Study on the Preference of Root Canal Sealers Among Pediatric Dentists For Obturating Permanent Teeth
A Cross-Sectional Study on the Preference of Root Canal Sealers Among Pediatric Dentists For Obturating Permanent Teeth
Utilisation of root canal sealers to perform obturation procedures is an endorsed method in endodontics and has an indispensable role in the success of treatment. The objective of ...

Back to Top