Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma beyond Milan Criteria

Purpose: This study aimed to elucidate the various new classifications and the use of LDLT in this context for HCC beyond milan criteria. Methods: The clinical data of patients with HCC outside milan criteria who underwent LT at Jena University between Januar 2007 and August 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Eligible patients were classified according to various classification systems. Clinicopathological features, overall- and disease-free survival rates were compared between the two groups (LT vs. LDLT) and in context for bridging therapy. Results: Among the 245 patients analyzed, 120 patients were outside milan criteria and 125 patients were inside milan. There was no significant difference for patients outside milan in overall survival for LT versus LDLT (OS 44,3 months vs. 28,3 months; 5y survival, 56,4% vs. 40%; p = 0.84). G3 tumor differentiation, presence of angioinvasion and lack of bridging were statistically significant risk factors predicting tumor recurrence in univariate and multivariate analysis (HR 6.34; p = 0.0002; HR 8.21; p < 0.0001; HR 7.50; p = 0.0001). Bridging therapy before transplantation provides a significant survival advantage regardless of the transplant procedure (OS: p = 0.008 ; DFS: p < 0.001). Conclusions: Patients with HCC outside milan criteria who underwent LT or LDLT had comparable outcome to patients inside milan criteria. Nevertheless, these patients remain disadvantaged on the waiting list, which is why LDLT represents a safe alternative to LT and should be considered in bridged HCC patients depending on tumor differentiation, size and tumor marker dynamics.