Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Development and Validation of a Nomogram for Predicting Survival in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock

View through CrossRef
AbstractBackgroundThere is currently a lack of easy-to-use tools for assessing the severity of cardiogenic shock (CS) patients. This study aims to develop a nomogram for evaluating severity in CS patients regardless of the underlying cause.Methods and ResultsThe MIMIC-IV database was used to identify 1923 CS patients admitted to the ICU. A multivariate Cox model was developed in the training cohort (70%) based on LASSO regression results. Factors such as age, systolic blood pressure, arterial oxygen saturation, hemoglobin, serum creatinine, blood glucose, arterial pH, arterial lactate, and norepinephrine use were incorporated into the final model. This model was visualized as a Cardiogenic Shock Survival Nomogram (CSSN) to predict 30-day survival rates. The model’s c-statistic was 0.75 (95% CI 0.73–0.77) in the training cohort and 0.73 (95% CI 0.70– 0.77) in the validation cohort, demonstrating good predictive accuracy. The AUC of the CSSN for 30-day survival probabilities was 0.76 in the training cohort and 0.73 in the validation cohort. Calibration plots showed strong concordance between predicted and actual survival rates, and decision curve analysis (DCA) affirmed the model’s clinical utility. The CSSN outperformed the Cardiogenic Shock Score (CSS) in various metrics, including c-statistic, time-dependent ROC, calibration plots, and DCA (c-statistic: 0.75 versus 0.72; AUC: 0.76 versus 0.73). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the model’s robustness across both AMI-CS and non-AMI-CS subgroups.ConclusionsThe CSSN was developed to predict 30-day survival rates in CS patients irrespective of the underlying cause, showing good performance and potential clinical utility in managing CS.CLINICAL PERSPECTIVEWhat Is New?This study presents the development and validation of a novel nomogram, the Cardiogenic Shock Survival Nomogram (CSSN), specifically designed for predicting 30-day survival rates in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS), regardless of the underlying cause.Utilizing a large cohort from the MIMIC-IV database, this research integrates multiple available clinical factors—such as age, systolic blood pressure, arterial oxygen saturation, hemoglobin levels, serum creatinine, blood glucose, arterial pH, arterial lactate, and norepinephrine use—into a convenient and easy to use the prognostic tool.What Are the Clinical Implications?Enhanced Decision-Making: Clinicians can utilize the CSSN as a practical tool to assess the severity and prognosis of CS patients, enabling more informed decision-making regarding treatment strategies.Improved Risk Stratification: By incorporating easily obtainable clinical parameters such as age, systolic blood pressure, arterial oxygen saturation, and biochemical markers, the CSSN provides a straightforward method for risk stratification, facilitating the identification of high-risk patients who may benefit from more intensive monitoring or advanced therapeutic interventions.
Title: Development and Validation of a Nomogram for Predicting Survival in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock
Description:
AbstractBackgroundThere is currently a lack of easy-to-use tools for assessing the severity of cardiogenic shock (CS) patients.
This study aims to develop a nomogram for evaluating severity in CS patients regardless of the underlying cause.
Methods and ResultsThe MIMIC-IV database was used to identify 1923 CS patients admitted to the ICU.
A multivariate Cox model was developed in the training cohort (70%) based on LASSO regression results.
Factors such as age, systolic blood pressure, arterial oxygen saturation, hemoglobin, serum creatinine, blood glucose, arterial pH, arterial lactate, and norepinephrine use were incorporated into the final model.
This model was visualized as a Cardiogenic Shock Survival Nomogram (CSSN) to predict 30-day survival rates.
The model’s c-statistic was 0.
75 (95% CI 0.
73–0.
77) in the training cohort and 0.
73 (95% CI 0.
70– 0.
77) in the validation cohort, demonstrating good predictive accuracy.
The AUC of the CSSN for 30-day survival probabilities was 0.
76 in the training cohort and 0.
73 in the validation cohort.
Calibration plots showed strong concordance between predicted and actual survival rates, and decision curve analysis (DCA) affirmed the model’s clinical utility.
The CSSN outperformed the Cardiogenic Shock Score (CSS) in various metrics, including c-statistic, time-dependent ROC, calibration plots, and DCA (c-statistic: 0.
75 versus 0.
72; AUC: 0.
76 versus 0.
73).
Sensitivity analyses confirmed the model’s robustness across both AMI-CS and non-AMI-CS subgroups.
ConclusionsThe CSSN was developed to predict 30-day survival rates in CS patients irrespective of the underlying cause, showing good performance and potential clinical utility in managing CS.
CLINICAL PERSPECTIVEWhat Is New?This study presents the development and validation of a novel nomogram, the Cardiogenic Shock Survival Nomogram (CSSN), specifically designed for predicting 30-day survival rates in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS), regardless of the underlying cause.
Utilizing a large cohort from the MIMIC-IV database, this research integrates multiple available clinical factors—such as age, systolic blood pressure, arterial oxygen saturation, hemoglobin levels, serum creatinine, blood glucose, arterial pH, arterial lactate, and norepinephrine use—into a convenient and easy to use the prognostic tool.
What Are the Clinical Implications?Enhanced Decision-Making: Clinicians can utilize the CSSN as a practical tool to assess the severity and prognosis of CS patients, enabling more informed decision-making regarding treatment strategies.
Improved Risk Stratification: By incorporating easily obtainable clinical parameters such as age, systolic blood pressure, arterial oxygen saturation, and biochemical markers, the CSSN provides a straightforward method for risk stratification, facilitating the identification of high-risk patients who may benefit from more intensive monitoring or advanced therapeutic interventions.

Related Results

Cardiogenic shock: role of invasive cardiology
Cardiogenic shock: role of invasive cardiology
Purpose of review Early revascularization significantly improved the outcome of patients with cardiogenic shock following acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Nevertheles...
What is the evidence for IABP in STEMI with and without cardiogenic shock?
What is the evidence for IABP in STEMI with and without cardiogenic shock?
Intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) is the most widely used left ventricular support device in a variety of indications. This review focuses on the current literature and discusses the...
Construction and validation of prognostic nomogram model for primary malignant cardiac tumours based on SEER database: A retrospective study
Construction and validation of prognostic nomogram model for primary malignant cardiac tumours based on SEER database: A retrospective study
Objective: To build a prognostic nomogram for predicting primary malignant cardiac tumour patients’ overall survival.Method: The retrospective study was conducted in January 2023, ...
Development and validation of a SEER-based prognostic nomogram for patients with bone metastatic prostate cancer
Development and validation of a SEER-based prognostic nomogram for patients with bone metastatic prostate cancer
Abstract Controversies exist between the previous two prognostic nomograms for patients with bone metastatic prostate cancer (PCa), and a nomogram applied to western pa...
Frequency of cardiogenic shock in acute inferior wall myocardial infraction.
Frequency of cardiogenic shock in acute inferior wall myocardial infraction.
Objective: The aim of the study to determine the frequency of cardiogenic shock and its associated factors in patients with inferior wall myocardial infarction in tertiary care hos...
A specific nomogram to predict subsequent brain metastasis in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer patients
A specific nomogram to predict subsequent brain metastasis in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer patients
1028 Background: The development of brain metastases is usually a fatal event in the history of breast cancer patients with metastatic disease other than brain (MDOB). We previous...
Refractory Shock. Casuistics
Refractory Shock. Casuistics
Shock Syndrome is an acute progressive circulatory insufficiency where the Heart is unable to circulate the blood in time unit, for supplying with O2 to the cells and to take out f...
Validation in Doctoral Education: Exploring PhD Students’ Perceptions of Belonging to Scaffold Doctoral Identity Work
Validation in Doctoral Education: Exploring PhD Students’ Perceptions of Belonging to Scaffold Doctoral Identity Work
Aim/Purpose: The aim of this article is to make a case of the role of validation in doctoral education. The purpose is to detail findings from three studies which explore PhD stude...

Back to Top