Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

ONTOTHEOLOGICAL TURNINGS? MARION, LACOSTE AND LEVINAS ON THE DECENTRING OF MODERN SUBJECTIVITY

View through CrossRef
AbstractIn this article, Schrijvers examines the decentering of the modern subject at issue in the thought of Emmanuel Levinas, Jean‐Luc Marion, and Jean‐Yves Lacoste from the perspective of ontotheology. Schrijvers contends that in both Marion's and Lacoste's phenomenology an unexpected return to the subject‐object distinction occurs, and asks whether a simple reversal of the subject‐object distinction suffices to break out of the ontotheological scheme. In a second move, Levinas’ account of a “relation without relation” is developed as a solution to the problem perceived in the works of Marion and Lacoste. Via a critique of Levinas, Schrijvers suggests that what is at stake in reversing the subject‐object distinction entails less an “overcoming” of ontotheology and more a matter of comporting oneself towards it in an appropriate way.
Title: ONTOTHEOLOGICAL TURNINGS? MARION, LACOSTE AND LEVINAS ON THE DECENTRING OF MODERN SUBJECTIVITY
Description:
AbstractIn this article, Schrijvers examines the decentering of the modern subject at issue in the thought of Emmanuel Levinas, Jean‐Luc Marion, and Jean‐Yves Lacoste from the perspective of ontotheology.
Schrijvers contends that in both Marion's and Lacoste's phenomenology an unexpected return to the subject‐object distinction occurs, and asks whether a simple reversal of the subject‐object distinction suffices to break out of the ontotheological scheme.
In a second move, Levinas’ account of a “relation without relation” is developed as a solution to the problem perceived in the works of Marion and Lacoste.
Via a critique of Levinas, Schrijvers suggests that what is at stake in reversing the subject‐object distinction entails less an “overcoming” of ontotheology and more a matter of comporting oneself towards it in an appropriate way.

Related Results

Kavramsal Putperestlik ve Felsefe-Jean-Luc Marion Felsefesine Bir Giriş
Kavramsal Putperestlik ve Felsefe-Jean-Luc Marion Felsefesine Bir Giriş
Conceptual Idolatry and Philosophy -An Introduction to the Philosophy of Jean-Luc Marion-rnJean-Luc Marion, regarded as one of the most important representatives of contemporary Fr...
Electric Animal An Interview with Akira Mizuta Lippit & (untitled photographs)
Electric Animal An Interview with Akira Mizuta Lippit & (untitled photographs)
Dr. Akira Mizuta Lippit, author of Electric Animal: Toward a Rhetoric of Wildlife, explores, in the context of the development of cinema, how the concept of “the animal” has become...
Alimentación ontológica e incorporación ética en Levinas
Alimentación ontológica e incorporación ética en Levinas
En el siguiente trabajo exponemos la tesis de Emmanuel Levinas según la cual en la subjetividad se entrelazan dos momentos, uno ontológico y uno propiamente ético, alejándose así d...
Fazer a guerra, fazer a crítica : politização da geografia em Yves Lacoste
Fazer a guerra, fazer a crítica : politização da geografia em Yves Lacoste
O presente estudo discute o conceito de guerra para Yves Lacoste, centrando-se na análise da obra "A geografia - isso serve, em primeiro lugar, para fazer a guerra". Parte-se da se...
Interpretation of Levinas in Marco Maria Olivetti’s Philosophy
Interpretation of Levinas in Marco Maria Olivetti’s Philosophy
This article analyses the original interpretation of Emmanuel Levinas’s philosophy by one of the most prominent Italian philosophers of the 20th century, Marco Maria Olivetti. It s...
Emmanuel Levinas
Emmanuel Levinas
Emmanuel Levinas (b. 1906–d. 1995) was a French-Jewish thinker known primarily as the philosopher of the ‘other.’ He studied with Husserl and Heidegger in the 1920s. He introduced ...
Levinas and the Critical Philosophy of Race
Levinas and the Critical Philosophy of Race
This essay accounts for the efficacy of Levinas’s conceptions of alterity, embodiment, and intersubjectivity for engaging the question of race. It traces the body of scholarship th...
The Other as Categorical Imperative: Levinas’s Reading of Kant
The Other as Categorical Imperative: Levinas’s Reading of Kant
For Kant and Levinas, the categorical imperative is the only possible formula for universalization. It has a structural necessity. Its claim is ultimate, valid without exception, a...

Back to Top