Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Comparison of efficacy and safety of three different concentrations of ropivacaine for labor pain management using patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA): A double-blind, randomized controlled trial
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background and Aims:
Labor pain is consistently ranked high on the various pain rating scales, when compared to other painful life experiences, and the experience of labor during the process of childbirth is both complex and subjective. Though patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) using dilute concentrations of local anesthetics (LAs) has been a popular method to control labor pain, yet the optimal dose and regimen for PCEA remain ambiguous. So, the present study was undertaken to evaluate the safety and efficacy of three different concentrations of ropivacaine for labor analgesia using PCEA.
Materials and Methods:
Seventy-five healthy nulliparous women who gave voluntary consent for labor analgesia using PCEA were randomly assigned to three groups to receive three different ropivacaine concentrations (0.0625%, 0.1%, and 0.125%) with adjuvant fentanyl 2 μg/ml, after double-blinding. Analgesic efficacy, neuraxial blockade, vital parameters, neonatal outcomes, maternal satisfaction, and side effects were assessed. Primary outcome was total dose of ropivacaine consumed in milligrams.
Results:
Number of pain breakthroughs (Visual Analog Score >4) and PCEA demand and rescue boluses were found to be statistically more in group 0.0625% (P < 0.01), followed by group 0.1% and were the least in 0.125%. Still, total drug consumed in milligrams was significantly less in 0.0625% group. Maternal satisfaction was comparable among the three groups (P = 0.33). There was no significant difference in maternal side effects and neonatal APGAR scores among the three groups.
Conclusion:
When three different concentrations of ropivacaine, that is, 0.0625%, 0.1%, and 0.125%, are used for labor analgesia, the use of 0.125% ropivacaine leads to higher total amount of ropivacaine consumed. Despite the lower efficacy in terms of breakthrough pain episodes observed with a 0.0625% ropivacaine concentration for labor analgesia, maternal satisfaction remained consistent across all three doses of ropivacaine. PCEA demand and rescue boluses for the lowest concentration, that is, 0.0625%; and did not affect maternal satisfaction with the management of labor pain.
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Title: Comparison of efficacy and safety of three different concentrations of ropivacaine for labor pain management using patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA): A double-blind, randomized controlled trial
Description:
Abstract
Background and Aims:
Labor pain is consistently ranked high on the various pain rating scales, when compared to other painful life experiences, and the experience of labor during the process of childbirth is both complex and subjective.
Though patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) using dilute concentrations of local anesthetics (LAs) has been a popular method to control labor pain, yet the optimal dose and regimen for PCEA remain ambiguous.
So, the present study was undertaken to evaluate the safety and efficacy of three different concentrations of ropivacaine for labor analgesia using PCEA.
Materials and Methods:
Seventy-five healthy nulliparous women who gave voluntary consent for labor analgesia using PCEA were randomly assigned to three groups to receive three different ropivacaine concentrations (0.
0625%, 0.
1%, and 0.
125%) with adjuvant fentanyl 2 μg/ml, after double-blinding.
Analgesic efficacy, neuraxial blockade, vital parameters, neonatal outcomes, maternal satisfaction, and side effects were assessed.
Primary outcome was total dose of ropivacaine consumed in milligrams.
Results:
Number of pain breakthroughs (Visual Analog Score >4) and PCEA demand and rescue boluses were found to be statistically more in group 0.
0625% (P < 0.
01), followed by group 0.
1% and were the least in 0.
125%.
Still, total drug consumed in milligrams was significantly less in 0.
0625% group.
Maternal satisfaction was comparable among the three groups (P = 0.
33).
There was no significant difference in maternal side effects and neonatal APGAR scores among the three groups.
Conclusion:
When three different concentrations of ropivacaine, that is, 0.
0625%, 0.
1%, and 0.
125%, are used for labor analgesia, the use of 0.
125% ropivacaine leads to higher total amount of ropivacaine consumed.
Despite the lower efficacy in terms of breakthrough pain episodes observed with a 0.
0625% ropivacaine concentration for labor analgesia, maternal satisfaction remained consistent across all three doses of ropivacaine.
PCEA demand and rescue boluses for the lowest concentration, that is, 0.
0625%; and did not affect maternal satisfaction with the management of labor pain.
Related Results
Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Abstract
Introduction
Although the efficacy of PD-L1 blockade has been evaluated in analyses that combine pharmacologically distinct antibodies, the specific efficacy and safety of...
Patient Decision Making Surrounding Epidural Use in Labor
Patient Decision Making Surrounding Epidural Use in Labor
Introduction/Objectives: Labor is thought to be one of the most painful experiences in a woman’s life, similar to pain caused by complex regional pain syndromes. Epidural analgesia...
A randomized comparative study of patient-controlled epidural analgesia with manual standard intermittent bolus for labor analgesia
A randomized comparative study of patient-controlled epidural analgesia with manual standard intermittent bolus for labor analgesia
Background: Patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) pump has proven to reduce the incidence of unscheduled clinician interventions and total dose of local anesthetic administe...
Optimal Dose of Epidural Dexmedetomidine Added to Ropivacaine for Epidural Labor Analgesia: A Pilot Study
Optimal Dose of Epidural Dexmedetomidine Added to Ropivacaine for Epidural Labor Analgesia: A Pilot Study
Background. Dexmedetomidine combined with local anesthetics can decrease the concentration of epidural ropivacaine. However, the optimal dose of epidural dexmedetomidine combined w...
The Labor Analgesia Requirements in Nulliparous Women Randomized to Epidural Catheter Placement in a High or Low Intervertebral Space
The Labor Analgesia Requirements in Nulliparous Women Randomized to Epidural Catheter Placement in a High or Low Intervertebral Space
BACKGROUND:
We hypothesized that an epidural catheter placed in a lower vertebral interspace will require less medication for labor analgesia.
...
Differential Diagnosis of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Review
Differential Diagnosis of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Review
Abstract
Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a complex and often overlooked condition caused by the compression of neurovascular structures as they pass through the thoracic outlet. ...
Effectiveness of Spinal Analgesia for Labor Pain Compared with Epidural Analgesia
Effectiveness of Spinal Analgesia for Labor Pain Compared with Epidural Analgesia
Objectives: This study aimed to compare the analgesic effect of single-dose spinal versus epidural analgesia for labor pain to verify if applying a single dose spinal analgesia is ...
“A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF 0.2% ROPIVACAINE VERSUS 0.2% ROPIVACAINE PLUS TRAMADOL FOR EPIDURAL POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA FOR ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERIES”
“A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF 0.2% ROPIVACAINE VERSUS 0.2% ROPIVACAINE PLUS TRAMADOL FOR EPIDURAL POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA FOR ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERIES”
Background And Objective: Postoperative analgesia can be achieved by various modalities. Out of which epidural analgesia offers a good reliable pain relief. Addition of opioids enh...

