Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The Labor Analgesia Requirements in Nulliparous Women Randomized to Epidural Catheter Placement in a High or Low Intervertebral Space

View through CrossRef
BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that an epidural catheter placed in a lower vertebral interspace will require less medication for labor analgesia. METHODS: Nulliparous women requesting neuraxial labor analgesia were randomized to epidural catheter placement at the ultrasound-confirmed L1-2 or L4-5 interspace. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia and breakthrough manual epidural boluses of 10 mL of 0.125% bupivacaine with 50 µg of fentanyl or 8 mL of 2% lidocaine were utilized. Abdominal and perineal pain scores were assessed at 30 and 60 minutes after standardized initiation of epidural analgesia. Pain scores during pushing were assessed after delivery. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients requiring manual boluses and was compared using a χ2 test. Secondarily, we analyzed the number of boluses given in early (up to 4 hours before delivery) versus late labor using χ2 tests and the pain scores using Mann-Whitney U tests, with adjustment of P values for multiple testing. RESULTS: We analyzed 148 patients. Overall, the percentage of patients in the low versus high groups who required manual boluses was 46% vs 51% (P = 1.0). For the 56 patients in each group who delivered vaginally, 22 (52%) vs 20 (48%) manual boluses were given to the low epidural group in early versus late labor, compared to 9 (20%) vs 36 (80%) in the high epidural group (P = .014). There was no statistical difference in patient-controlled epidural analgesia requirements or patient satisfaction. Comparing the low versus high groups, the median (interquartile range) pain scores were: 3 (1, 6) vs 0 (0, 2) (P = .013) at 30 minutes and 1 (1, 3) vs 0 (0, 1) (P = .013) at 60 minutes for abdominal pain; 0 (0, 2) vs 1 (1, 3) (P = .36) and 0 (0, 1) vs 1 (1, 3) (P = .014) at these same time points for perineal pain; and 1 (0, 5) vs 0 (0, 3) (P = .9) for abdominal and 2 (0, 5) vs 4 (1, 8) (P = .025) for perineal pain during pushing. The percentage of patients who underwent instrumental delivery was 15% vs 5% (P = .06) for the low versus high group. CONCLUSIONS: An L4-5 epidural catheter initially provides less relief of abdominal pain but more relief of perineal labor pain. Patients with an L4-5 catheter require more manual boluses during early labor but less during late labor. The possible association of low epidural catheters with instrumental delivery merits further investigation.
Title: The Labor Analgesia Requirements in Nulliparous Women Randomized to Epidural Catheter Placement in a High or Low Intervertebral Space
Description:
BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that an epidural catheter placed in a lower vertebral interspace will require less medication for labor analgesia.
METHODS: Nulliparous women requesting neuraxial labor analgesia were randomized to epidural catheter placement at the ultrasound-confirmed L1-2 or L4-5 interspace.
Patient-controlled epidural analgesia and breakthrough manual epidural boluses of 10 mL of 0.
125% bupivacaine with 50 µg of fentanyl or 8 mL of 2% lidocaine were utilized.
Abdominal and perineal pain scores were assessed at 30 and 60 minutes after standardized initiation of epidural analgesia.
Pain scores during pushing were assessed after delivery.
The primary outcome was the proportion of patients requiring manual boluses and was compared using a χ2 test.
Secondarily, we analyzed the number of boluses given in early (up to 4 hours before delivery) versus late labor using χ2 tests and the pain scores using Mann-Whitney U tests, with adjustment of P values for multiple testing.
RESULTS: We analyzed 148 patients.
Overall, the percentage of patients in the low versus high groups who required manual boluses was 46% vs 51% (P = 1.
0).
For the 56 patients in each group who delivered vaginally, 22 (52%) vs 20 (48%) manual boluses were given to the low epidural group in early versus late labor, compared to 9 (20%) vs 36 (80%) in the high epidural group (P = .
014).
There was no statistical difference in patient-controlled epidural analgesia requirements or patient satisfaction.
Comparing the low versus high groups, the median (interquartile range) pain scores were: 3 (1, 6) vs 0 (0, 2) (P = .
013) at 30 minutes and 1 (1, 3) vs 0 (0, 1) (P = .
013) at 60 minutes for abdominal pain; 0 (0, 2) vs 1 (1, 3) (P = .
36) and 0 (0, 1) vs 1 (1, 3) (P = .
014) at these same time points for perineal pain; and 1 (0, 5) vs 0 (0, 3) (P = .
9) for abdominal and 2 (0, 5) vs 4 (1, 8) (P = .
025) for perineal pain during pushing.
The percentage of patients who underwent instrumental delivery was 15% vs 5% (P = .
06) for the low versus high group.
CONCLUSIONS: An L4-5 epidural catheter initially provides less relief of abdominal pain but more relief of perineal labor pain.
Patients with an L4-5 catheter require more manual boluses during early labor but less during late labor.
The possible association of low epidural catheters with instrumental delivery merits further investigation.

Related Results

Patient Decision Making Surrounding Epidural Use in Labor
Patient Decision Making Surrounding Epidural Use in Labor
Introduction/Objectives: Labor is thought to be one of the most painful experiences in a woman’s life, similar to pain caused by complex regional pain syndromes. Epidural analgesia...
Pregnant Prisoners in Shackles
Pregnant Prisoners in Shackles
Photo by niu niu on Unsplash ABSTRACT Shackling prisoners has been implemented as standard procedure when transporting prisoners in labor and during childbirth. This procedure ensu...
Effectiveness of Spinal Analgesia for Labor Pain Compared with Epidural Analgesia
Effectiveness of Spinal Analgesia for Labor Pain Compared with Epidural Analgesia
Objectives: This study aimed to compare the analgesic effect of single-dose spinal versus epidural analgesia for labor pain to verify if applying a single dose spinal analgesia is ...
Knot formation in a thoracic epidural catheter: a case report
Knot formation in a thoracic epidural catheter: a case report
Abstract Background Although most epidural catheter knot formation has been reported in lumbar epidural catheter placement, knot formation in a thor...
Epidural catheter migration during cesarean
Epidural catheter migration during cesarean
Abstract Background Early detection and vigilance of high spinal anesthesia post epidural catheter migration in cesarean section leads to safe condu...
Labor Induction And The Incidence of Intrapartum Maternal Fever In Epidural Labor Analgesia: A Retrospective Case-Control Study
Labor Induction And The Incidence of Intrapartum Maternal Fever In Epidural Labor Analgesia: A Retrospective Case-Control Study
Abstract Background: To assess the influence of labor induction on the intrapartum maternal fever in epidural labor analgesia and to determine its association with intrapar...
Uptake of Epidural Analgesia among Parturients at a Tertiary Centre in Port Harcourt, South-South Nigeria
Uptake of Epidural Analgesia among Parturients at a Tertiary Centre in Port Harcourt, South-South Nigeria
Background Painless, yet progressive labour process is the desire of most parturients globally, and this can be achieved effectively with epidural analgesia especially if administe...
Women in Australian Politics: Maintaining the Rage against the Political Machine
Women in Australian Politics: Maintaining the Rage against the Political Machine
Women in federal politics are under-represented today and always have been. At no time in the history of the federal parliament have women achieved equal representation with men. T...

Back to Top