Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The Labor Analgesia Requirements in Nulliparous Women Randomized to Epidural Catheter Placement in a High or Low Intervertebral Space
View through CrossRef
BACKGROUND:
We hypothesized that an epidural catheter placed in a lower vertebral interspace will require less medication for labor analgesia.
METHODS:
Nulliparous women requesting neuraxial labor analgesia were randomized to epidural catheter placement at the ultrasound-confirmed L1-2 or L4-5 interspace. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia and breakthrough manual epidural boluses of 10 mL of 0.125% bupivacaine with 50 µg of fentanyl or 8 mL of 2% lidocaine were utilized. Abdominal and perineal pain scores were assessed at 30 and 60 minutes after standardized initiation of epidural analgesia. Pain scores during pushing were assessed after delivery. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients requiring manual boluses and was compared using a χ2 test. Secondarily, we analyzed the number of boluses given in early (up to 4 hours before delivery) versus late labor using χ2 tests and the pain scores using Mann-Whitney U tests, with adjustment of P values for multiple testing.
RESULTS:
We analyzed 148 patients. Overall, the percentage of patients in the low versus high groups who required manual boluses was 46% vs 51% (P = 1.0). For the 56 patients in each group who delivered vaginally, 22 (52%) vs 20 (48%) manual boluses were given to the low epidural group in early versus late labor, compared to 9 (20%) vs 36 (80%) in the high epidural group (P = .014). There was no statistical difference in patient-controlled epidural analgesia requirements or patient satisfaction. Comparing the low versus high groups, the median (interquartile range) pain scores were: 3 (1, 6) vs 0 (0, 2) (P = .013) at 30 minutes and 1 (1, 3) vs 0 (0, 1) (P = .013) at 60 minutes for abdominal pain; 0 (0, 2) vs 1 (1, 3) (P = .36) and 0 (0, 1) vs 1 (1, 3) (P = .014) at these same time points for perineal pain; and 1 (0, 5) vs 0 (0, 3) (P = .9) for abdominal and 2 (0, 5) vs 4 (1, 8) (P = .025) for perineal pain during pushing. The percentage of patients who underwent instrumental delivery was 15% vs 5% (P = .06) for the low versus high group.
CONCLUSIONS:
An L4-5 epidural catheter initially provides less relief of abdominal pain but more relief of perineal labor pain. Patients with an L4-5 catheter require more manual boluses during early labor but less during late labor. The possible association of low epidural catheters with instrumental delivery merits further investigation.
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Title: The Labor Analgesia Requirements in Nulliparous Women Randomized to Epidural Catheter Placement in a High or Low Intervertebral Space
Description:
BACKGROUND:
We hypothesized that an epidural catheter placed in a lower vertebral interspace will require less medication for labor analgesia.
METHODS:
Nulliparous women requesting neuraxial labor analgesia were randomized to epidural catheter placement at the ultrasound-confirmed L1-2 or L4-5 interspace.
Patient-controlled epidural analgesia and breakthrough manual epidural boluses of 10 mL of 0.
125% bupivacaine with 50 µg of fentanyl or 8 mL of 2% lidocaine were utilized.
Abdominal and perineal pain scores were assessed at 30 and 60 minutes after standardized initiation of epidural analgesia.
Pain scores during pushing were assessed after delivery.
The primary outcome was the proportion of patients requiring manual boluses and was compared using a χ2 test.
Secondarily, we analyzed the number of boluses given in early (up to 4 hours before delivery) versus late labor using χ2 tests and the pain scores using Mann-Whitney U tests, with adjustment of P values for multiple testing.
RESULTS:
We analyzed 148 patients.
Overall, the percentage of patients in the low versus high groups who required manual boluses was 46% vs 51% (P = 1.
0).
For the 56 patients in each group who delivered vaginally, 22 (52%) vs 20 (48%) manual boluses were given to the low epidural group in early versus late labor, compared to 9 (20%) vs 36 (80%) in the high epidural group (P = .
014).
There was no statistical difference in patient-controlled epidural analgesia requirements or patient satisfaction.
Comparing the low versus high groups, the median (interquartile range) pain scores were: 3 (1, 6) vs 0 (0, 2) (P = .
013) at 30 minutes and 1 (1, 3) vs 0 (0, 1) (P = .
013) at 60 minutes for abdominal pain; 0 (0, 2) vs 1 (1, 3) (P = .
36) and 0 (0, 1) vs 1 (1, 3) (P = .
014) at these same time points for perineal pain; and 1 (0, 5) vs 0 (0, 3) (P = .
9) for abdominal and 2 (0, 5) vs 4 (1, 8) (P = .
025) for perineal pain during pushing.
The percentage of patients who underwent instrumental delivery was 15% vs 5% (P = .
06) for the low versus high group.
CONCLUSIONS:
An L4-5 epidural catheter initially provides less relief of abdominal pain but more relief of perineal labor pain.
Patients with an L4-5 catheter require more manual boluses during early labor but less during late labor.
The possible association of low epidural catheters with instrumental delivery merits further investigation.
Related Results
Pregnant Prisoners in Shackles
Pregnant Prisoners in Shackles
Photo by niu niu on Unsplash
ABSTRACT
Shackling prisoners has been implemented as standard procedure when transporting prisoners in labor and during childbirth. This procedure ensu...
Effectiveness of Spinal Analgesia for Labor Pain Compared with Epidural Analgesia
Effectiveness of Spinal Analgesia for Labor Pain Compared with Epidural Analgesia
Objectives: This study aimed to compare the analgesic effect of single-dose spinal versus epidural analgesia for labor pain to verify if applying a single dose spinal analgesia is ...
Women in Australian Politics: Maintaining the Rage against the Political Machine
Women in Australian Politics: Maintaining the Rage against the Political Machine
Women in federal politics are under-represented today and always have been. At no time in the history of the federal parliament have women achieved equal representation with men. T...
Intractable pruritus during outpatient epidural hydromorphone infusion: A case report and a focused review of the literature
Intractable pruritus during outpatient epidural hydromorphone infusion: A case report and a focused review of the literature
Background: Intraspinal drug delivery therapy has been increasingly used in patients with intractable, nonmalignant pain who have failed to respond to conventional treatment or can...
The Fate of Lumbar Epidural Catheters in the Postoperative Period- A Retrospective Single-center Audit
The Fate of Lumbar Epidural Catheters in the Postoperative Period- A Retrospective Single-center Audit
This paper describes a retrospective audit of fate of epidural catheters in post operative period in adults and elderly patients (more than 65 years) receiving epidural infusion an...
Informed Consent for Epidural Analgesia at the Time of Labor Pain, Seems Too Late!
Informed Consent for Epidural Analgesia at the Time of Labor Pain, Seems Too Late!
Pain in the process of childbirth is the phenomenon mostly feared by every woman in her pregnancy, and is a major cause of dissatisfaction and embarrassing memories of labor. Usage...
Informed Consent for Epidural Analgesia at the Time of Labor Pain, Seems Too Late!
Informed Consent for Epidural Analgesia at the Time of Labor Pain, Seems Too Late!
Pain in the process of childbirth is the phenomenon mostly feared by every woman in her pregnancy, and is a major cause of dissatisfaction and embarrassing memories of labor. Usage...
An Early Labor Assessment Program: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
An Early Labor Assessment Program: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Background:Approximately 31 percent of cesarean deliveries in the United States and Canada are performed for dystocia. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of e...

