Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Does executive directors from controlling shareholders improve corporate governance?

View through CrossRef
Purpose The existence of controlling shareholders creates a remarkable difference between the corporate governance structures of Chinese firms and those of western firms. Despite the increasing importance of controlling shareholders, it remains disputable whether they are playing the “tunneling” roles or the “governance” roles. Therefore, more research is needed on what roles controlling shareholders are playing and how they play their roles. Previous empirical studies document a common phenomenon that directors play dual roles both on the board and in the top management team. Because of information asymmetry, the board of directors may not be able to perform its supervisory and strategic decision-making functions. Therefore, this paper aims to investigate whether controlling shareholders participate in firm management by appointing the executive directors and examine the economic consequences of controlling shareholder involvement. Design/methodology/approach In the empirical tests, the authors use the split share structure reform in China as a natural experiment. Using the data from Chinese listed firms between 2001 and 2015 and difference-in-differences analysis, the authors examine the impact of the split share structure reform on the executive directors of controlling shareholders and the governance effect of controlling shareholders’ appointing executive directors to the management. Findings The authors find that controlling shareholders get involved in firm management by appointing executive directors to strengthen the supervision and incentives of managers. The authors also find that firms exhibit a lower level of earnings management and enhance and higher pay-performance sensitivity after controlling shareholders appoint executive directors to the top management team. Originality/value As the natural experiment of the split share structure reform enables us to mitigate endogeneity, the authors investigate the channels through, which controlling shareholders get involved in firm management from the unique perspective of executive director appointment. The study expands the literature on corporate governance and board functions. The findings provide new insights to the effect of controlling shareholder governance and casts light on a new way for controlling shareholders of Chinese firms to participate in firm management – by appointing executive directors.
Title: Does executive directors from controlling shareholders improve corporate governance?
Description:
Purpose The existence of controlling shareholders creates a remarkable difference between the corporate governance structures of Chinese firms and those of western firms.
Despite the increasing importance of controlling shareholders, it remains disputable whether they are playing the “tunneling” roles or the “governance” roles.
Therefore, more research is needed on what roles controlling shareholders are playing and how they play their roles.
Previous empirical studies document a common phenomenon that directors play dual roles both on the board and in the top management team.
Because of information asymmetry, the board of directors may not be able to perform its supervisory and strategic decision-making functions.
Therefore, this paper aims to investigate whether controlling shareholders participate in firm management by appointing the executive directors and examine the economic consequences of controlling shareholder involvement.
Design/methodology/approach In the empirical tests, the authors use the split share structure reform in China as a natural experiment.
Using the data from Chinese listed firms between 2001 and 2015 and difference-in-differences analysis, the authors examine the impact of the split share structure reform on the executive directors of controlling shareholders and the governance effect of controlling shareholders’ appointing executive directors to the management.
Findings The authors find that controlling shareholders get involved in firm management by appointing executive directors to strengthen the supervision and incentives of managers.
The authors also find that firms exhibit a lower level of earnings management and enhance and higher pay-performance sensitivity after controlling shareholders appoint executive directors to the top management team.
Originality/value As the natural experiment of the split share structure reform enables us to mitigate endogeneity, the authors investigate the channels through, which controlling shareholders get involved in firm management from the unique perspective of executive director appointment.
The study expands the literature on corporate governance and board functions.
The findings provide new insights to the effect of controlling shareholder governance and casts light on a new way for controlling shareholders of Chinese firms to participate in firm management – by appointing executive directors.

Related Results

Hubungan Kualitas Audit, Komite Audit, dan Dewan Pengawas Syariah terhadap Kinerja Bank Umum Syariah di Indonesia
Hubungan Kualitas Audit, Komite Audit, dan Dewan Pengawas Syariah terhadap Kinerja Bank Umum Syariah di Indonesia
ABSTRAK Penelitian ini ditujukan untuk mengetahui hubungan kualitas audit, komite audit, dan Dewan Pengawas Syariah (DPS) terhadap kinerja Bank Umum Syariah di Indonesia pada tahun...
Unfair prejudice in United Kingdom Company Law
Unfair prejudice in United Kingdom Company Law
It is common that the majority shareholders in a corporation take action that unfairly prejudices the minority. A majority shareholder occupies a dominant position in the decision-...
THE MYTH OF DIRECTOR APPOINTMENT BY SHAREHOLDERS AND SHAREHOLDER ACTIVISM IN LISTED COMPANIES
THE MYTH OF DIRECTOR APPOINTMENT BY SHAREHOLDERS AND SHAREHOLDER ACTIVISM IN LISTED COMPANIES
This article aims to articulate two main arguments. The first is that even though shareholders are the owners of the capital of their business enterprises and are apparently best s...
Corporate Governance of Banks after the Financial Crisis - Theory, Evidence, Reforms
Corporate Governance of Banks after the Financial Crisis - Theory, Evidence, Reforms
Poor corporate governance of banks has increasingly been acknowledged as an important cause of the recent financial crisis. Given the developments since the Asian financial crisis ...
Dividend policy on controlling and non-controlling shareholders: case in Indonesia
Dividend policy on controlling and non-controlling shareholders: case in Indonesia
The purpose of this study is to examine dividend policy on both the controlling and non-controlling shareholders based on assumptions according to theories of life cycle, and free ...
ANALISIS GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE TERHADAP NILAI PERUSAHAAN
ANALISIS GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE TERHADAP NILAI PERUSAHAAN
AbstractHigh corporate value becomes the desire of the owners of the company, because with a high value indicates the high prosperity of the shareholders, and they will invest capi...

Back to Top