Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Injection Water Quality - A Key Factor to Successful Waterflooding
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Poor injection water quality is a prime factor in the reduction in injectivity in many water injection and disposal wells. These rejections in injectivity often result in costly workovers, stimulation jobs and recompletions or, in many cases, the uncontrolled fracturing of wells by high bottomhole pressures resulting in poor water injection conformance and reduced overall sweep efficiency and recovery.
This paper discusses many commonly occurring water quality issues and how they impact injectivity, including damage due to injection of suspended solids, fines migration, clay swelling and deflocculation, formation dissolution, chemical adsorption and wettability alterations, relative permeability effects associated with the injection of skim oil or grease and the injection of entrained free gas, biologically and bacterially induced damage, formation of insoluble scales and precipitates, emulsification, Will: and asphaltene deposition. Screening criteria are presented to allow for a rigorous evaluation of a particular injection water source to investigate potential areas of sensitivity and to attempt to minimize problems associated with impaired injectivity.
Introduction
Water injection processes are utilized throughout the world to dispose of produced aqueous fluids and as a means of increasing the recovery efficiency in many oilreservoirs. A key factor in the success of these operations is contingent on being able to inject a sufficient quantity of the water of interest into the target zone. Injectivity can be restricted by:Poor inherent reservoir quality;Insufficient pay or contact of the pay zone of interest by the injection well;Formation damage effects associated with the actual water injection process.
The subject matter of this paper will concentrate on the topic of injection water quality and how this factor relates to impaired injectivity.
Impaired injectivity causes problems in that it restricts the volume of water which can be injected in a given well (causing potential problems with voidage replacement for a waterflood, or the buildup on surface of a large volume of produced water in a disposal operation). Often downhole injection pressure may exceed fracture pressure causing the initiation and propagation of uncontrolled induced fractures. These fractures reduce overall efficiency of the waterflood process by lowering areal sweep efficiency and possibly directing injected fluids out of the zones of interest.
Almost all problems associated with impaired injectivity can ultimately be related back to problems associated with water quality. Potential damage mechanisms which can be associated with water injection processes include:Mechanically induced damage, including:Injection of solidsVelocity induced damage (fines migration)Injection water-formation rock interactions, including:Clay swellingClay deflocculationFormation dissolutionChemical adsorption/wettability alterationsRelative permeability effects, including:Skim oil entrainmentFree gas entrainmentBiologically induced impairment, including:Bacterial entrainment and growthInjection water-insitu fluid interactions, including:Formation of insoluble scalesEmulsificationPrecipitationWax/asphaltene deposition
Each of these phenom
Title: Injection Water Quality - A Key Factor to Successful Waterflooding
Description:
Abstract
Poor injection water quality is a prime factor in the reduction in injectivity in many water injection and disposal wells.
These rejections in injectivity often result in costly workovers, stimulation jobs and recompletions or, in many cases, the uncontrolled fracturing of wells by high bottomhole pressures resulting in poor water injection conformance and reduced overall sweep efficiency and recovery.
This paper discusses many commonly occurring water quality issues and how they impact injectivity, including damage due to injection of suspended solids, fines migration, clay swelling and deflocculation, formation dissolution, chemical adsorption and wettability alterations, relative permeability effects associated with the injection of skim oil or grease and the injection of entrained free gas, biologically and bacterially induced damage, formation of insoluble scales and precipitates, emulsification, Will: and asphaltene deposition.
Screening criteria are presented to allow for a rigorous evaluation of a particular injection water source to investigate potential areas of sensitivity and to attempt to minimize problems associated with impaired injectivity.
Introduction
Water injection processes are utilized throughout the world to dispose of produced aqueous fluids and as a means of increasing the recovery efficiency in many oilreservoirs.
A key factor in the success of these operations is contingent on being able to inject a sufficient quantity of the water of interest into the target zone.
Injectivity can be restricted by:Poor inherent reservoir quality;Insufficient pay or contact of the pay zone of interest by the injection well;Formation damage effects associated with the actual water injection process.
The subject matter of this paper will concentrate on the topic of injection water quality and how this factor relates to impaired injectivity.
Impaired injectivity causes problems in that it restricts the volume of water which can be injected in a given well (causing potential problems with voidage replacement for a waterflood, or the buildup on surface of a large volume of produced water in a disposal operation).
Often downhole injection pressure may exceed fracture pressure causing the initiation and propagation of uncontrolled induced fractures.
These fractures reduce overall efficiency of the waterflood process by lowering areal sweep efficiency and possibly directing injected fluids out of the zones of interest.
Almost all problems associated with impaired injectivity can ultimately be related back to problems associated with water quality.
Potential damage mechanisms which can be associated with water injection processes include:Mechanically induced damage, including:Injection of solidsVelocity induced damage (fines migration)Injection water-formation rock interactions, including:Clay swellingClay deflocculationFormation dissolutionChemical adsorption/wettability alterationsRelative permeability effects, including:Skim oil entrainmentFree gas entrainmentBiologically induced impairment, including:Bacterial entrainment and growthInjection water-insitu fluid interactions, including:Formation of insoluble scalesEmulsificationPrecipitationWax/asphaltene deposition
Each of these phenom.
Related Results
Potable Water Sources, Household Hygiene, and Sanitation Practices in Ikpoba Okha LGA, Edo State: Implications for Public Health and Sustainable Water Management
Omoregie, Andrew Edosa.1 Omoregie Abieyuwa Peace2 Okoro, Enyinnaya Okoro.3
1 College of Medi
Potable Water Sources, Household Hygiene, and Sanitation Practices in Ikpoba Okha LGA, Edo State: Implications for Public Health and Sustainable Water Management
Omoregie, Andrew Edosa.1 Omoregie Abieyuwa Peace2 Okoro, Enyinnaya Okoro.3
1 College of Medi
BACKGROUND
Access to potable drinking water and sufficient sanitation continues to be an urgent global concern, particularly in developing regions where con...
Overview of Key Zonal Water Injection Technologies in China
Overview of Key Zonal Water Injection Technologies in China
Abstract
Separated layer water injection is the important technology to realize the oilfield long-term high and stable yield. Through continuous researches and te...
An Integrated Methodology for the Unified Optimization of Injection/Production Rates and Surface Waterflooding Pipeline Network Operation Control
An Integrated Methodology for the Unified Optimization of Injection/Production Rates and Surface Waterflooding Pipeline Network Operation Control
Abstract
As the most commonly used process for the secondary development of oilfields, waterflooding plays a significant role in maintaining reservoir pressure, enha...
ANALISIS PERTIMBANGAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG DALAM MENGABULKAN KASASI TERDAKWA (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 2959/K/PID.SUS/2022)
ANALISIS PERTIMBANGAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG DALAM MENGABULKAN KASASI TERDAKWA (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 2959/K/PID.SUS/2022)
<p><em><span class="markedContent"><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*195.53px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*496.87px); font-size: calc(var(--scale-...
Water Management In Petrobras: Developments And Challenges
Water Management In Petrobras: Developments And Challenges
Abstract
This paper presents some of the most important aspects of water management in Petrobras offshore fields, as well as its challenges and perspectives.
...
Utilizing Steam Injection to Improve Performance of Mature Waterflooding Reservoir
Utilizing Steam Injection to Improve Performance of Mature Waterflooding Reservoir
Abstract
F reservoir, a mature waterflooding reservoir with high wax content and oil viscosity higher than 50cp, is developed by 30-year's waterflooding with 14% oil...
KEDUDUKAN AHLI BAHASA DALAM PEMBUKTIAN PERKARA PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR: 47/PID.SUS/2019/PN. MGT)
KEDUDUKAN AHLI BAHASA DALAM PEMBUKTIAN PERKARA PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR: 47/PID.SUS/2019/PN. MGT)
<em><span id="page3R_mcid52" class="markedContent"><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*125.30px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*539.11px); font-size: calc(va...
A Critical Review of Alternative Desalination Technologies for Smart Waterflooding
A Critical Review of Alternative Desalination Technologies for Smart Waterflooding
Summary
The importance of tuning injection-water chemistry for upstream is moving beyond formation-damage control/water incompatibility to increasing oil recovery fr...

