Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

ASSESSMENT OF PREMIXED VERSUS SEQUENTIAL ADMINISTRATION OF HYPERBARIC LEVOBUPIVACAINE WITH FENTANYL FOR SENSORY EFFECT OF SPINAL ANAESTHESIA IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING LOWER ABDOMINAL SURGERIES

View through CrossRef
Background: Spinal anaesthesia is widely employed for elective lower abdominal surgeries because of its rapid onset, reliable sensory blockade, excellent muscle relaxation, and favourable recovery profile. Hyperbaric levobupivacaine is increasingly preferred due to its reduced cardiotoxicity and improved safety profile compared with racemic bupivacaine. Intrathecal fentanyl is commonly used as an adjuvant to enhance block quality and postoperative analgesia. However, limited evidence exists regarding whether sequential administration of hyperbaric levobupivacaine and fentanyl offers advantages over premixed administration in terms of sensory block characteristics, haemodynamic stability, and postoperative analgesia. Methods: This prospective observational comparative study was conducted in the Department of Anaesthesiology, Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, between October 2024 and October 2025. A total of 58 patients aged 18 60 years belonging to ASA physical status I and II and undergoing elective lower abdominal surgeries under spinal anaesthesia were enrolled. Participants were allocated into two groups of 29 patients each. Group S received sequential intrathecal administration of hyperbaric levobupivacaine followed by fentanyl, whereas Group M received a premixed intrathecal solution of the same drugs. Sensory block characteristics, haemodynamic parameters, and postoperative analgesic outcomes were assessed and compared between the groups. Results: Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable between groups. The onset of sensory block was significantly faster in Group S than in Group M (3.72 ± 0.81 vs. 4.45 ± 0.90 minutes; p=0.003). The duration of sensory blockade was significantly prolonged in Group S, with regression to the L1 dermatome occurring at 103.28 ± 11.98 minutes compared with 91.86 ± 10.95 minutes in Group M (p<0.001). Mean arterial pressure was significantly higher in Group S (83.52 ± 6.21 mmHg) than in Group M (79.90 ± 6.84 mmHg; p=0.031). The incidence of hypotension (17.24% vs. 37.93%) and vasopressor requirement (13.79% vs. 34.48%) were lower in Group S. Postoperative analgesia was significantly superior in Group S, with a longer time to first rescue analgesia (198.52 ± 26.21 vs. 162.48 ± 23.95 minutes; p<0.001) and lower total analgesic consumption (108.97 ± 27.84 vs. 146.21 ± 32.59 mg; p<0.001). Conclusion: Sequential intrathecal administration of hyperbaric levobupivacaine and fentanyl provides faster onset and longer duration of sensory blockade, improved haemodynamic stability, prolonged postoperative analgesia, and reduced analgesic consumption compared with premixed administration. Sequential administration may therefore represent a simple and effective strategy for optimizing spinal anaesthesia in elective lower abdominal surgeries.
Title: ASSESSMENT OF PREMIXED VERSUS SEQUENTIAL ADMINISTRATION OF HYPERBARIC LEVOBUPIVACAINE WITH FENTANYL FOR SENSORY EFFECT OF SPINAL ANAESTHESIA IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING LOWER ABDOMINAL SURGERIES
Description:
Background: Spinal anaesthesia is widely employed for elective lower abdominal surgeries because of its rapid onset, reliable sensory blockade, excellent muscle relaxation, and favourable recovery profile.
Hyperbaric levobupivacaine is increasingly preferred due to its reduced cardiotoxicity and improved safety profile compared with racemic bupivacaine.
Intrathecal fentanyl is commonly used as an adjuvant to enhance block quality and postoperative analgesia.
However, limited evidence exists regarding whether sequential administration of hyperbaric levobupivacaine and fentanyl offers advantages over premixed administration in terms of sensory block characteristics, haemodynamic stability, and postoperative analgesia.
Methods: This prospective observational comparative study was conducted in the Department of Anaesthesiology, Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, between October 2024 and October 2025.
A total of 58 patients aged 18 60 years belonging to ASA physical status I and II and undergoing elective lower abdominal surgeries under spinal anaesthesia were enrolled.
Participants were allocated into two groups of 29 patients each.
Group S received sequential intrathecal administration of hyperbaric levobupivacaine followed by fentanyl, whereas Group M received a premixed intrathecal solution of the same drugs.
Sensory block characteristics, haemodynamic parameters, and postoperative analgesic outcomes were assessed and compared between the groups.
Results: Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable between groups.
The onset of sensory block was significantly faster in Group S than in Group M (3.
72 ± 0.
81 vs.
4.
45 ± 0.
90 minutes; p=0.
003).
The duration of sensory blockade was significantly prolonged in Group S, with regression to the L1 dermatome occurring at 103.
28 ± 11.
98 minutes compared with 91.
86 ± 10.
95 minutes in Group M (p<0.
001).
Mean arterial pressure was significantly higher in Group S (83.
52 ± 6.
21 mmHg) than in Group M (79.
90 ± 6.
84 mmHg; p=0.
031).
The incidence of hypotension (17.
24% vs.
37.
93%) and vasopressor requirement (13.
79% vs.
34.
48%) were lower in Group S.
Postoperative analgesia was significantly superior in Group S, with a longer time to first rescue analgesia (198.
52 ± 26.
21 vs.
162.
48 ± 23.
95 minutes; p<0.
001) and lower total analgesic consumption (108.
97 ± 27.
84 vs.
146.
21 ± 32.
59 mg; p<0.
001).
Conclusion: Sequential intrathecal administration of hyperbaric levobupivacaine and fentanyl provides faster onset and longer duration of sensory blockade, improved haemodynamic stability, prolonged postoperative analgesia, and reduced analgesic consumption compared with premixed administration.
Sequential administration may therefore represent a simple and effective strategy for optimizing spinal anaesthesia in elective lower abdominal surgeries.

Related Results

Comparison of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl as adjuvants to intrathecal isobaric levobupivacaine in lower segment caesarean section
Comparison of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl as adjuvants to intrathecal isobaric levobupivacaine in lower segment caesarean section
Background/Aim: Caesarean section is one the most common surgeries encountered in the operating room worldwide in the younger demo-graphic ages from 18-39 years of age. The objecti...
Effect of Labor Epidural Analgesia with and without Fentanyl on Infant Breast-feeding
Effect of Labor Epidural Analgesia with and without Fentanyl on Infant Breast-feeding
Background The influence of labor epidural fentanyl on the neonate is controversial. The purpose of this study was to determine whether epidural fentanyl has an impact ...
Nalbuphin as an Adjuvant to Levobupivacaine in Caudal Analgesia in Children
Nalbuphin as an Adjuvant to Levobupivacaine in Caudal Analgesia in Children
Abstract Background Caudal anethesia is the single most important pediatric regional anethetic technique and is increasingly per...
Comparison Of Hyperbaric Bupivacaine In Conventional Dose To Isobaric Levobupivacaine Used For Infra Umbilical Surgeries
Comparison Of Hyperbaric Bupivacaine In Conventional Dose To Isobaric Levobupivacaine Used For Infra Umbilical Surgeries
Background: For spinal anesthesia, levobupivacaine is considered an effective alternative anaesthetic agent to conventional bupivacaineowing to the faster recovery profile and lowe...

Back to Top