Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Efficacy and safety of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (Paxlovid) for COVID‐19: A rapid review and meta‐analysis
View through CrossRef
Abstract
This study aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (Paxlovid) for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19). PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, medRxiv, and Google Scholar were searched to identify the relevant evidence up to November 10, 2022. The reference lists of key studies were also scanned to find additional records. The quality of the studies was evaluated using the Cochrane tools for assessing the risk of bias. The Comprehensive Meta‐Analysis software version 3.0 was employed for data analysis. Twenty‐three studies involving 314 353 patients were included in the analysis. The findings of the meta‐analysis showed a significant difference between the Paxlovid and no‐Paxlovid groups in terms of mortality rate (odds ratio [OR] = 0.25; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.14–0.45), hospitalization rate (OR = 0.40; 95% CI: 0.24–0.69), polymerase chain reaction negative conversion time (mean difference [MD] = −2.46; 95% CI: −4.31 to −0.61), and hospitalization or death rate (OR = 0.17; 95% CI: 0.06–0.46). However, no significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of COVID‐19 rebound (OR = 0.84; 95% CI: 0.67–1.04), emergency department visit (OR = 0.75; 95% CI: 0.45–1.24), intensive care unit admission (OR = 0.37; 95% CI: 0.13–1.01), and adverse events (OR = 2.20; 95% CI: 0.42–11.47). The results of the present study support the efficacy and safety of Paxlovid in the treatment of patients with COVID‐19. Further research is needed to investigate the COVID‐19 rebound after Paxlovid treatment.
Title: Efficacy and safety of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (Paxlovid) for COVID‐19: A rapid review and meta‐analysis
Description:
Abstract
This study aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (Paxlovid) for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19).
PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, medRxiv, and Google Scholar were searched to identify the relevant evidence up to November 10, 2022.
The reference lists of key studies were also scanned to find additional records.
The quality of the studies was evaluated using the Cochrane tools for assessing the risk of bias.
The Comprehensive Meta‐Analysis software version 3.
0 was employed for data analysis.
Twenty‐three studies involving 314 353 patients were included in the analysis.
The findings of the meta‐analysis showed a significant difference between the Paxlovid and no‐Paxlovid groups in terms of mortality rate (odds ratio [OR] = 0.
25; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.
14–0.
45), hospitalization rate (OR = 0.
40; 95% CI: 0.
24–0.
69), polymerase chain reaction negative conversion time (mean difference [MD] = −2.
46; 95% CI: −4.
31 to −0.
61), and hospitalization or death rate (OR = 0.
17; 95% CI: 0.
06–0.
46).
However, no significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of COVID‐19 rebound (OR = 0.
84; 95% CI: 0.
67–1.
04), emergency department visit (OR = 0.
75; 95% CI: 0.
45–1.
24), intensive care unit admission (OR = 0.
37; 95% CI: 0.
13–1.
01), and adverse events (OR = 2.
20; 95% CI: 0.
42–11.
47).
The results of the present study support the efficacy and safety of Paxlovid in the treatment of patients with COVID‐19.
Further research is needed to investigate the COVID‐19 rebound after Paxlovid treatment.
Related Results
Antiviral efficacy of oral ensitrelvir versus oral ritonavir-boosted nirmatrelvir in COVID-19
Antiviral efficacy of oral ensitrelvir versus oral ritonavir-boosted nirmatrelvir in COVID-19
Abstract
Background
Ensitrelvir is an oral antiviral treatment for COVID-19 with the same molecular target as ritonavir-boosted...
Impact of extended-course oral nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (Paxlovid) in established Long COVID: Case series and research considerations
Impact of extended-course oral nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (Paxlovid) in established Long COVID: Case series and research considerations
AbstractBackground: Prior case series suggest that a 5-day course of oral Paxlovid (nirmatrelvir/ritonavir) benefits some people with Long COVID, within and/or outside of the conte...
EVALPAX: Evaluation of a pharmacist-driven protocol for nirmatrelvir/ritonavir prescribing in a community hospital system
EVALPAX: Evaluation of a pharmacist-driven protocol for nirmatrelvir/ritonavir prescribing in a community hospital system
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to evaluate pharmacist prescribing of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir to ensure thi...
SAT-579 Potential Glucose-Lowering Properties of Paxlovid® in Type 2 Diabetes Patients
SAT-579 Potential Glucose-Lowering Properties of Paxlovid® in Type 2 Diabetes Patients
Abstract
Disclosure: S. Dickerman: None. F.A. Al-Khayer: None.
Introduction: Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir co-packaged as Paxlovid® are drugs designed ...
Population pharmacokinetics of ritonavir as a booster of lopinavir, atazanavir, or darunavir in African children with HIV
Population pharmacokinetics of ritonavir as a booster of lopinavir, atazanavir, or darunavir in African children with HIV
ABSTRACT
Ritonavir is important in antiretroviral therapy (ART) because it is used to
boost the ...
A cost-effectiveness analysis of Molnupiravir and Paxlovid in three African countries
A cost-effectiveness analysis of Molnupiravir and Paxlovid in three African countries
Abstract
Objective
To assess the cost-effectiveness of two COVID-19 oral antivirals (COAVs) Paxlovid and Molnupiravir compared ...
Effectiveness of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir versus azvudine for adult inpatients with severe or critical COVID-19
Effectiveness of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir versus azvudine for adult inpatients with severe or critical COVID-19
Background
In China, both nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (Paxlovid) and azvudine have been granted approval to treat adult SARS-CoV-2-infected patients with moderate symp...

