Javascript must be enabled to continue!
EVALPAX: Evaluation of a pharmacist-driven protocol for nirmatrelvir/ritonavir prescribing in a community hospital system
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to evaluate pharmacist prescribing of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir to ensure this method of increasing access to treatment is safe and effective.
Methods
This multicenter, retrospective observational study included patients receiving a prescription for nirmatrelvir/ritonavir by a physician, nurse practitioner (NP), physician assistant (PA), or pharmacist at an Indiana University (IU) Health West Central Region site over a 3-month period. Patients were divided into two groups: those who received nirmatrelvir/ritonavir prescribed by a pharmacist (the pharmacist prescribed group) and those who received nirmatrelvir/ritonavir prescribed by other providers (the physician/NP/PA prescribed group). Electronic health record (EHR) reviews were performed to assess the appropriateness of prescriptions based on the presence of risk factors and symptoms, day of symptom onset, and dosing. The primary endpoint was the overall appropriateness of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir prescriptions in the two study groups based on emergency use authorization inclusion and exclusion requirements. Secondary endpoints included appropriateness of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir dosing and medically attended visits or mortality within 30 days. Statistical analysis of the endpoints occurred post hoc utilizing the Fisher’s exact test.
Results
A total of 259 patients were included in the pharmacist prescribed group and 265 patients in the physician/NP/PA prescribed group. Overall appropriate nirmatrelvir/ritonavir prescribing occurred in 258 patients (99.6%) and 232 patients (87.5%) in the pharmacist and physician/NP/PA prescribed groups, respectively (P < 0.0001). Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir dosing was appropriate in 256 patients (98.8%) and 240 patients (90.6%) in the pharmacist and physician/NP/PA prescribed groups, respectively (P < 0.0001). The 30-day rates of medically attended visits were similar between groups. No patients died within 30 days of treatment in either group.
Conclusion
Pharmacist prescribing of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir may result in a higher likelihood of prescriptions meeting overall appropriateness criteria. Pharmacists represent an important healthcare professional resource to improve nirmatrelvir/ritonavir prescribing and utilization.
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Title: EVALPAX: Evaluation of a pharmacist-driven protocol for nirmatrelvir/ritonavir prescribing in a community hospital system
Description:
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to evaluate pharmacist prescribing of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir to ensure this method of increasing access to treatment is safe and effective.
Methods
This multicenter, retrospective observational study included patients receiving a prescription for nirmatrelvir/ritonavir by a physician, nurse practitioner (NP), physician assistant (PA), or pharmacist at an Indiana University (IU) Health West Central Region site over a 3-month period.
Patients were divided into two groups: those who received nirmatrelvir/ritonavir prescribed by a pharmacist (the pharmacist prescribed group) and those who received nirmatrelvir/ritonavir prescribed by other providers (the physician/NP/PA prescribed group).
Electronic health record (EHR) reviews were performed to assess the appropriateness of prescriptions based on the presence of risk factors and symptoms, day of symptom onset, and dosing.
The primary endpoint was the overall appropriateness of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir prescriptions in the two study groups based on emergency use authorization inclusion and exclusion requirements.
Secondary endpoints included appropriateness of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir dosing and medically attended visits or mortality within 30 days.
Statistical analysis of the endpoints occurred post hoc utilizing the Fisher’s exact test.
Results
A total of 259 patients were included in the pharmacist prescribed group and 265 patients in the physician/NP/PA prescribed group.
Overall appropriate nirmatrelvir/ritonavir prescribing occurred in 258 patients (99.
6%) and 232 patients (87.
5%) in the pharmacist and physician/NP/PA prescribed groups, respectively (P < 0.
0001).
Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir dosing was appropriate in 256 patients (98.
8%) and 240 patients (90.
6%) in the pharmacist and physician/NP/PA prescribed groups, respectively (P < 0.
0001).
The 30-day rates of medically attended visits were similar between groups.
No patients died within 30 days of treatment in either group.
Conclusion
Pharmacist prescribing of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir may result in a higher likelihood of prescriptions meeting overall appropriateness criteria.
Pharmacists represent an important healthcare professional resource to improve nirmatrelvir/ritonavir prescribing and utilization.
Related Results
Antiviral efficacy of oral ensitrelvir versus oral ritonavir-boosted nirmatrelvir in COVID-19
Antiviral efficacy of oral ensitrelvir versus oral ritonavir-boosted nirmatrelvir in COVID-19
Abstract
Background
Ensitrelvir is an oral antiviral treatment for COVID-19 with the same molecular target as ritonavir-boosted...
Impact of extended-course oral nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (Paxlovid) in established Long COVID: Case series and research considerations
Impact of extended-course oral nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (Paxlovid) in established Long COVID: Case series and research considerations
AbstractBackground: Prior case series suggest that a 5-day course of oral Paxlovid (nirmatrelvir/ritonavir) benefits some people with Long COVID, within and/or outside of the conte...
Population pharmacokinetics of ritonavir as a booster of lopinavir, atazanavir, or darunavir in African children with HIV
Population pharmacokinetics of ritonavir as a booster of lopinavir, atazanavir, or darunavir in African children with HIV
ABSTRACT
Ritonavir is important in antiretroviral therapy (ART) because it is used to
boost the ...
The HIV-Protease Inhibitor Ritonavir(Norvir®) Is Active Against Human AML Blasts In Vitro and In Vivo and Has Synergistic Cytotoxic Activity with the Proteaseome Inhibitor Bortezomib (Velcade®).
The HIV-Protease Inhibitor Ritonavir(Norvir®) Is Active Against Human AML Blasts In Vitro and In Vivo and Has Synergistic Cytotoxic Activity with the Proteaseome Inhibitor Bortezomib (Velcade®).
Abstract
Upregulation of alternative proteolytic pathways characterizes malignant cells that overcome proteasome inhibition in vitro. The proteasome inhibitor Bortez...
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Abstract
Introduction
Hospitals are high-risk environments for infections. Despite the global recognition of these pathogens, few studies compare microorganisms from community-acqu...
Understanding doctors' perceptions of their prescribing competency and the value they ascribe to an electronic prescribing system
Understanding doctors' perceptions of their prescribing competency and the value they ascribe to an electronic prescribing system
Resistance to adoption has been identified as one of the major barriers to successful implementation of technological systems in hospitals. Acceptance of an electronic prescribing ...
P-1650. Temporal Trends in Serious Adverse Events Associated with Oral Antivirals During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Insights from the FAERS Database (2020–2023)
P-1650. Temporal Trends in Serious Adverse Events Associated with Oral Antivirals During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Insights from the FAERS Database (2020–2023)
Abstract
Background
The COVID-19 pandemic led to the widespread use of emergency-authorized and repurposed oral antiviral...
Oral Nirmatrelvir and Severe Covid-19 Outcomes During the Omicron Surge
Oral Nirmatrelvir and Severe Covid-19 Outcomes During the Omicron Surge
Abstract
Background
Nirmatrelvir, an inhibitor of the main protease of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), has demonstrated a significant decreas...

