Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Stent diameter and stent-related symptoms, does size matter? A systematic review and meta-analysis

View through CrossRef
The ureteral insertion of a silicone tube was first performed in 1967. A validated ureteral stent symptom questionnaire (USSQ) is used for an objective assessment of patient-reported stent-related symptoms. As the impact of stent diameter on the incidence of stent-related symptoms is unclear, we aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing USSQ reported outcomes when using a 6 Fr diameter ureteric stent, versus smaller diameter stents (4.7–5 Fr) when inserted for ureteric stones. All randomized control trials and comparative studies of 6 Fr versus 4.7–5 Fr ureteric stents were reviewed. The USSQ outcomes were considered as the primary outcome measures while stent migration was considered as a secondary outcome measure. A total of 61 articles were identified of which four studies met the eligibility criteria. There was a statistically significant association between the use of wider (6 Fr) diameter stents and the incidence of urinary symptoms as measured by the urinary index score. Larger stent diameters were associated with a statistically significant increase in the pain index score. There was no statistically significant difference in the scores between the compared stent diameters with regard to work performance score, general health index score, additional problems index score, and stent migration. There were insufficient reported outcomes to perform a meta-analysis of sexual matters index score. Our meta-analysis shows that using smaller diameter ureteric stents is associated with reduced urinary symptoms and patient-reported pain. Other USSQ parameter outcomes are statistically similar in the 6 Fr ureteric stent cohort versus the 4.7–5 Fr ureteric stent cohort. Our meta-analysis was limited due to the limited number of studies and gross heterogeneity of reporting parameters in various studies. We hope a large-scale homogeneous randomized control trial will further shed more insight into the stent symptoms response to stent diameter.
Title: Stent diameter and stent-related symptoms, does size matter? A systematic review and meta-analysis
Description:
The ureteral insertion of a silicone tube was first performed in 1967.
A validated ureteral stent symptom questionnaire (USSQ) is used for an objective assessment of patient-reported stent-related symptoms.
As the impact of stent diameter on the incidence of stent-related symptoms is unclear, we aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing USSQ reported outcomes when using a 6 Fr diameter ureteric stent, versus smaller diameter stents (4.
7–5 Fr) when inserted for ureteric stones.
All randomized control trials and comparative studies of 6 Fr versus 4.
7–5 Fr ureteric stents were reviewed.
The USSQ outcomes were considered as the primary outcome measures while stent migration was considered as a secondary outcome measure.
A total of 61 articles were identified of which four studies met the eligibility criteria.
There was a statistically significant association between the use of wider (6 Fr) diameter stents and the incidence of urinary symptoms as measured by the urinary index score.
Larger stent diameters were associated with a statistically significant increase in the pain index score.
There was no statistically significant difference in the scores between the compared stent diameters with regard to work performance score, general health index score, additional problems index score, and stent migration.
There were insufficient reported outcomes to perform a meta-analysis of sexual matters index score.
Our meta-analysis shows that using smaller diameter ureteric stents is associated with reduced urinary symptoms and patient-reported pain.
Other USSQ parameter outcomes are statistically similar in the 6 Fr ureteric stent cohort versus the 4.
7–5 Fr ureteric stent cohort.
Our meta-analysis was limited due to the limited number of studies and gross heterogeneity of reporting parameters in various studies.
We hope a large-scale homogeneous randomized control trial will further shed more insight into the stent symptoms response to stent diameter.

Related Results

On Flores Island, do "ape-men" still exist? https://www.sapiens.org/biology/flores-island-ape-men/
On Flores Island, do "ape-men" still exist? https://www.sapiens.org/biology/flores-island-ape-men/
<span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="background:#f9f9f4"><span style="line-height:normal"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><b><spa...
Hubungan Perilaku Pola Makan dengan Kejadian Anak Obesitas
Hubungan Perilaku Pola Makan dengan Kejadian Anak Obesitas
<p><em><span style="font-size: 11.0pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman',serif; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-langua...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical activi...
Novel functionalized and patterned surfaces for cardiovascular applications
Novel functionalized and patterned surfaces for cardiovascular applications
Nowadays, cardiovascular diseases are mainly treated by implantation of a metallic or polymeric mesh, called stent, which maintains the artery widely open. This technique shows ver...
Abstract 6025: Optimal Stent Deployment. Five Seconds Is Not Enough
Abstract 6025: Optimal Stent Deployment. Five Seconds Is Not Enough
Background . The risk of thrombosis which had been well described since the advent of stenting, is currently being re-addressed in the era of drug-eluting stents (DES)....
Fluid and Solid Mechanics in Stented Arteries
Fluid and Solid Mechanics in Stented Arteries
Abstract Vascular stents are being used in increasing numbers to correct arterial flow limiting disorders. Although data exist on the in vivo performance of these de...

Back to Top