Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Bashing Belisarius: polemical characterizations in Procopius’ Secret History

View through CrossRef
ABSTRACT: When attacking their enemies late Roman and Byzantine intellectuals recognized that words could be effective and sometimes deadly weapons. These authors have left some memorable polemics. Of these, the most famous and widely read today is the sixth-century Anecdota or Secret History by Procopius. This article examines the role polemic plays in the Secret History and particularly Procopius’ hostile portrait of his former superior, the general Belisarius. Capitalizing upon recent advancements made in our understanding of the possible literary and political context behind the Secret History , I suggest that Procopius’ seeming turn against Belisarius in this work, which inverts the historian’s heroic characterization of Belisarius from his De bellis or On the Wars , is best seen as a calculated piece of political manoeuvring rather than as evidence of the historian’s ‘true’ animosity towards the general.
Title: Bashing Belisarius: polemical characterizations in Procopius’ Secret History
Description:
ABSTRACT: When attacking their enemies late Roman and Byzantine intellectuals recognized that words could be effective and sometimes deadly weapons.
These authors have left some memorable polemics.
Of these, the most famous and widely read today is the sixth-century Anecdota or Secret History by Procopius.
This article examines the role polemic plays in the Secret History and particularly Procopius’ hostile portrait of his former superior, the general Belisarius.
Capitalizing upon recent advancements made in our understanding of the possible literary and political context behind the Secret History , I suggest that Procopius’ seeming turn against Belisarius in this work, which inverts the historian’s heroic characterization of Belisarius from his De bellis or On the Wars , is best seen as a calculated piece of political manoeuvring rather than as evidence of the historian’s ‘true’ animosity towards the general.

Related Results

1. Procopius, From Manuscripts to Books: 1400–1850
1. Procopius, From Manuscripts to Books: 1400–1850
The path from mainly 13th- and 14th-century Byzantine manuscripts of Procopius’ Wars, Secret History and Buildings to a modern critical edition of all three works together was long...
Procopius’ Belisarius
Procopius’ Belisarius
This article re-evaluates the portrayal of Belisarius by Procopius and other sixth-century sources, not to uncover new biographical data but to trace the evolving representation of...
Belisarius & Antonina
Belisarius & Antonina
Abstract He was a famous general, victor over the Persians, conqueror of the Vandals and Ostrogoths. She was a first-rate political operative, deposer of a pope, wie...
Afterlife and Legend
Afterlife and Legend
Abstract Belisarius and Antonina have lived on in myth and legend in the roughly 1,500 years since their deaths. This legend began in the Middle Ages, with a Greek t...
Italy Redux
Italy Redux
Abstract The disgrace of Belisarius in 542 proved to be temporary, and by spring 544 (or possibly earlier) the general was rehabilitated by the Emperor Justinian (r....
Trying Times
Trying Times
Abstract In 540, Belisarius and Antonina were at the apex of their power and prestige. Belisarius had defeated Vandals and Ostrogoths, brought both their kings as pr...
Twilight of a Power Couple
Twilight of a Power Couple
Abstract Recalled by the Emperor Justinian (r. 527–565) after a disappointing second campaign in Italy, Belisarius arrived in Constantinople in 549. The general was ...
From Rome to Ravenna
From Rome to Ravenna
Abstract The Ostrogoths were unwilling to let Belisarius hold Rome uncontested, and so under the leadership of their king, Vittigis, they subjected the city to a lon...

Back to Top