Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Rupture analysis of the 2020 Petrinja earthquake based on seismological observations
View through CrossRef
<p>Here, I use seismological observations (~70 broadband stations at distances between 100 and 400 km from the source) to characterize the rupture properties of the Petrinja mainshock (Mw 6.4). First, I perform a spectral analysis of the P-waves to compute the corner frequency. In order to remove the wave propagation effects and isolate the source properties, I use the largest foreshocks and aftershocks (Mw>4) as empirical Green&#8217;s functions (EGFs). Assuming a Brune&#8217;s source model, the obtained stress drop is ~20 MPa. This rather large value is in agreement with the short rupture length of ~8 km inferred by InSAR data (Ganas et al. 2021). In addition, the weak azimuthal variations of the corner frequencies indicates a bilateral rupture, that is a rupture nucleating close to the fault center. Second, I compute the apparent source time functions (i.e. the source time functions &#8220;seen&#8221; from any station) using an EGF deconvolution approach. The results indicate an average rupture duration of 5-6 s with weak azimuthal variation of the apparent rupture duration, in agreement with the spectral analysis. Finally, I perform a Bayesian inversion of the apparent source function, in order to obtain a kinematic model of the rupture propagation (slip distribution, rupture velocity). The preliminary results reveal a slow velocity of the rupture propagation. Such a slow rupture velocity associated with a large stress drop has been observed on other faults with slow slip rates (e.g. Causse et al. 2017). This work provides insight on the rupture process of this major event on a poorly documented fault. I am fully open for collaborations to further develop and enrich this study.</p><p><br><strong>References</strong><br>Causse, M., G. Cultrera, L. Moreau, A. Herrero, E. Schiapappietra and F. Courboulex. Bayesian rupture imaging in a complex medium. The 29 May 2012 Emilia, Northern Italy, earthquake (2017), Geophysical Research Letters, DOI : 10.1002/2017GL074698.<br>Ganas, A., Elias, P., Valkaniotis, S., Tsironi, V., Karasante, I., Briole, P., 2021, Petrinja earthquake moved crust 10 feet, Temblor, http://doi.org/10.32858/temblor.156</p>
Title: Rupture analysis of the 2020 Petrinja earthquake based on seismological observations
Description:
<p>Here, I use seismological observations (~70 broadband stations at distances between 100 and 400 km from the source) to characterize the rupture properties of the Petrinja mainshock (Mw 6.
4).
First, I perform a spectral analysis of the P-waves to compute the corner frequency.
In order to remove the wave propagation effects and isolate the source properties, I use the largest foreshocks and aftershocks (Mw>4) as empirical Green&#8217;s functions (EGFs).
Assuming a Brune&#8217;s source model, the obtained stress drop is ~20 MPa.
This rather large value is in agreement with the short rupture length of ~8 km inferred by InSAR data (Ganas et al.
2021).
In addition, the weak azimuthal variations of the corner frequencies indicates a bilateral rupture, that is a rupture nucleating close to the fault center.
Second, I compute the apparent source time functions (i.
e.
the source time functions &#8220;seen&#8221; from any station) using an EGF deconvolution approach.
The results indicate an average rupture duration of 5-6 s with weak azimuthal variation of the apparent rupture duration, in agreement with the spectral analysis.
Finally, I perform a Bayesian inversion of the apparent source function, in order to obtain a kinematic model of the rupture propagation (slip distribution, rupture velocity).
The preliminary results reveal a slow velocity of the rupture propagation.
Such a slow rupture velocity associated with a large stress drop has been observed on other faults with slow slip rates (e.
g.
Causse et al.
2017).
This work provides insight on the rupture process of this major event on a poorly documented fault.
I am fully open for collaborations to further develop and enrich this study.
</p><p><br><strong>References</strong><br>Causse, M.
, G.
Cultrera, L.
Moreau, A.
Herrero, E.
Schiapappietra and F.
Courboulex.
Bayesian rupture imaging in a complex medium.
The 29 May 2012 Emilia, Northern Italy, earthquake (2017), Geophysical Research Letters, DOI : 10.
1002/2017GL074698.
<br>Ganas, A.
, Elias, P.
, Valkaniotis, S.
, Tsironi, V.
, Karasante, I.
, Briole, P.
, 2021, Petrinja earthquake moved crust 10 feet, Temblor, http://doi.
org/10.
32858/temblor.
156</p>.
Related Results
The Petrinja earthquake series located and visualised using machine learning
The Petrinja earthquake series located and visualised using machine learning
Earthquake detection and phase picking are crucial steps in the analysis of earthquakes. With the increasing number of seismic instruments available, large amounts of seismic data ...
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Abstarct
Introduction
Isolated brain hydatid disease (BHD) is an extremely rare form of echinococcosis. A prompt and timely diagnosis is a crucial step in disease management. This ...
Impact and Insights from the 2020 Petrinja Earthquake
Impact and Insights from the 2020 Petrinja Earthquake
The ML 6.2 Petrinja earthquake, which struck on December 29, 2020, is one of the most significant continental earthquakes in central Europe in recent years, following previous majo...
Pattern in Simultaneous Rupture of the Medial Collateral Ligament and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Pattern in Simultaneous Rupture of the Medial Collateral Ligament and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Background: Determining the exact details of complex traumatic injuries such as knee ligament rupture will be a crucial point in planning the surgical approach, which is determined...
Dynamic rupture of crosscutting faults: A possible rupture process for the 2007 Mw 6.6 Niigata‐ken Chuetsu‐Oki earthquake
Dynamic rupture of crosscutting faults: A possible rupture process for the 2007 Mw 6.6 Niigata‐ken Chuetsu‐Oki earthquake
The 2007 Mw 6.6 Niigata‐ken Chuetsu‐Oki earthquake implies a complex fault mechanism. Several surveys suggest the possibility of two main segments crosscutting each other at their ...
An up-to-date seismic catalogue of the 2020 Mw6.4 Petrinja (Croatia) earthquake sequence using machine learning
An up-to-date seismic catalogue of the 2020 Mw6.4 Petrinja (Croatia) earthquake sequence using machine learning
Identifying earthquakes and selecting their arrival phases are essential tasks in earthquake analysis. As more seismic instruments become available, they produce vast amounts of se...
Geometric Control on Seismic Rupture and Earthquake Sequence Along the Yingxiu‐Beichuan Fault With Implications for the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake
Geometric Control on Seismic Rupture and Earthquake Sequence Along the Yingxiu‐Beichuan Fault With Implications for the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake
AbstractThe 2008 Mw 7.9 Wenchuan earthquake is the most disastrous seismic event in China since 1976. Both field and seismological investigations suggest a multi‐stage coseismic ru...

