Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Growing Platforms by Adding Complementors without a Contract

View through CrossRef
<p>Multi-sided platforms often pursue growth strategies of expanding participants on one side (e.g., suppliers) and leveraging the cross-side network effect to attract participants on other sides (e.g., consumers). While formal contractual agreements have traditionally been the norm for onboarding suppliers, an emerging trend involves platforms enabling consumers to interact with non-contracted suppliers via third-party enablers, with both sharing profits from providing complementary services. This study examines this strategy of increasing market thickness in the context of food delivery platforms, focusing on the platforms' inclusion of restaurants as "non-partnered" restaurants. Non-partnered restaurants do not pay commission fees for being listed on the platforms and do not control their menu or item prices. The platforms collect and transfer consumer orders to the third-party deliverers who place the order, pick up, and deliver the food to consumers. The strategy has drawn regulatory scrutiny regarding its potential harm to non-partnered restaurants and consumers. This research empirically investigates the impact of this non-contracted partnership on restaurants, leveraging two natural experiments: (1) a number of non-partnered restaurants were listed on the platform, and (2) the restaurants were later delisted because of a governmental regulation. Our findings show that being added as a non-partnered restaurant increases these restaurants' revenue from takeout orders by about $1,410 per month. Adding non-partnered restaurants also has a positive spillover effect on the revenue of partnered restaurants already on the platform. Finally, the de-listing of non-partnered restaurants leads to a drop in their takeout orders, as well as a negative spillover on the revenue of partnered restaurants. In essence, a "non-partnered'' contract benefits most restaurants, especially independent restaurants. These insights can inform the design of platform and regulatory policies related to non-contracted growth strategies.</p>
Title: Growing Platforms by Adding Complementors without a Contract
Description:
<p>Multi-sided platforms often pursue growth strategies of expanding participants on one side (e.
g.
, suppliers) and leveraging the cross-side network effect to attract participants on other sides (e.
g.
, consumers).
While formal contractual agreements have traditionally been the norm for onboarding suppliers, an emerging trend involves platforms enabling consumers to interact with non-contracted suppliers via third-party enablers, with both sharing profits from providing complementary services.
This study examines this strategy of increasing market thickness in the context of food delivery platforms, focusing on the platforms' inclusion of restaurants as "non-partnered" restaurants.
Non-partnered restaurants do not pay commission fees for being listed on the platforms and do not control their menu or item prices.
The platforms collect and transfer consumer orders to the third-party deliverers who place the order, pick up, and deliver the food to consumers.
The strategy has drawn regulatory scrutiny regarding its potential harm to non-partnered restaurants and consumers.
This research empirically investigates the impact of this non-contracted partnership on restaurants, leveraging two natural experiments: (1) a number of non-partnered restaurants were listed on the platform, and (2) the restaurants were later delisted because of a governmental regulation.
Our findings show that being added as a non-partnered restaurant increases these restaurants' revenue from takeout orders by about $1,410 per month.
Adding non-partnered restaurants also has a positive spillover effect on the revenue of partnered restaurants already on the platform.
Finally, the de-listing of non-partnered restaurants leads to a drop in their takeout orders, as well as a negative spillover on the revenue of partnered restaurants.
In essence, a "non-partnered'' contract benefits most restaurants, especially independent restaurants.
These insights can inform the design of platform and regulatory policies related to non-contracted growth strategies.
</p>.

Related Results

The impact of organic rice contract farming on farmers' livelihood and land tenure in Cambodia : a case study in Kampong Speu province
The impact of organic rice contract farming on farmers' livelihood and land tenure in Cambodia : a case study in Kampong Speu province
This study examines organic rice contract farming in Cambodia and its impact on farmers‟ livelihood and land tenure. The study‟s objective is to gain a better insight of the terms ...
Perbandingan Fiqh Tentang Akad Tidak Bernama
Perbandingan Fiqh Tentang Akad Tidak Bernama
Abstract This paper uses a type of qualitative research with a library research focus. The discussion of this paper, first discusses the meaning of contract in a comparative ...
Privity in e-Contract in Nigeria
Privity in e-Contract in Nigeria
The doctrine of privity of contract excludes a third party to a contract from claiming a right under a contract between specific parties that have voluntarily entered into the cont...
Architectural Generativity: Leveraging Complementor Contributions to the Platform Architecture
Architectural Generativity: Leveraging Complementor Contributions to the Platform Architecture
In the context of platforms, an open architecture is instrumental in enabling innovation by complementors. But as complementors increasingly deplete the innovation opportunities th...
Power contestation and regulation in digital platform ecosystems—The case of the EU’s Digital Markets Act
Power contestation and regulation in digital platform ecosystems—The case of the EU’s Digital Markets Act
Abstract In this study, we investigate how power contestation between complementors and powerful platform owners unfolds in digital platform ecosystems as they co...
International arbitration contract principles: analysis of Middle East perceptions
International arbitration contract principles: analysis of Middle East perceptions
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine the main contract principles which govern the international arbitration contract with special emphasis to examine contract principle ...
Commitment to renegotiate the composition of the amended contract
Commitment to renegotiate the composition of the amended contract
The main reason for the formation of the amended contract is the change in the circumstances surrounding the basic contract, so that the implementation of the contract for one of i...

Back to Top