Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Legal Effects and Enforcement Limits of the WTO Dispute Settlement Rulings in the European Union
View through CrossRef
In the global regime of international trade law, the dispute settlement system of the World Trade Organization plays a central role in ensuring compliance with multilateral trade rules. Nonetheless, the legal effects of WTO dispute settlement rulings within domestic legal orders remain inherently limited. This article examines the interaction between WTO law and EU law, focusing on the enforcement limits of WTO rulings, as well as the structural tension between external trade obligations and the autonomy of the EU legal order. The article explores the normative framework of the WTO dispute settlement system and analyzes the scope of trade-restrictive remedies as envisaged by the Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU). The article also examines the EU Customs Union as an exception under Article XXIV GATT and its legal implications for WTO compliance. In addition, the article explores the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of EU concerning the direct and indirect effect of WTO law. Moreover, it evaluates the consequences of the limited enforceability of WTO rulings in the context of trade protectionism and regionalism, focusing on the ongoing crisis of the Appellate Body of WTO.
Title: Legal Effects and Enforcement Limits of the WTO Dispute Settlement Rulings in the European Union
Description:
In the global regime of international trade law, the dispute settlement system of the World Trade Organization plays a central role in ensuring compliance with multilateral trade rules.
Nonetheless, the legal effects of WTO dispute settlement rulings within domestic legal orders remain inherently limited.
This article examines the interaction between WTO law and EU law, focusing on the enforcement limits of WTO rulings, as well as the structural tension between external trade obligations and the autonomy of the EU legal order.
The article explores the normative framework of the WTO dispute settlement system and analyzes the scope of trade-restrictive remedies as envisaged by the Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU).
The article also examines the EU Customs Union as an exception under Article XXIV GATT and its legal implications for WTO compliance.
In addition, the article explores the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of EU concerning the direct and indirect effect of WTO law.
Moreover, it evaluates the consequences of the limited enforceability of WTO rulings in the context of trade protectionism and regionalism, focusing on the ongoing crisis of the Appellate Body of WTO.
Related Results
Pitching Outside the DSU: Preliminary Rulings in WTO Dispute Settlement
Pitching Outside the DSU: Preliminary Rulings in WTO Dispute Settlement
It has become the norm for WTO panels to issue rulings on preliminary issues such as jurisdiction, terms of reference and other related issues pertaining to a dispute upon the requ...
Using res judicata to resolve jurisdictional conflicts between WTO and regional trade agreements’ dispute settlement mechanisms
Using res judicata to resolve jurisdictional conflicts between WTO and regional trade agreements’ dispute settlement mechanisms
The WTO has a renowned dispute settlement body, distinguished from other dispute settlement bodies by its compulsory and exclusive jurisdiction. However, regional trade agreements ...
WTO AGREEMENTS: WAYS OF INTERPRETATION
WTO AGREEMENTS: WAYS OF INTERPRETATION
Background. The most of the world’s trade relations are governed by uniform rules that form the legal basis of the WTO. Member states sometimes have different understanding of the ...
Aktuelle Probleme der WTO
Aktuelle Probleme der WTO
Nach Ende des Zweiten Weltkrieges unterzeichnen knapp zwei Dutzend Staaten das von den USA vorgeschlagene «Allgemeine Zoll- und Handelsabkommen» (GATT). Die damalige Neuordnung des...
Avoiding Scandals Through Tax Rulings Transparency
Avoiding Scandals Through Tax Rulings Transparency
In 2014, the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists broke the “LuxLeaks” scandal, revealing numerous tax rulings that the press termed “sweetheart deals” granted to ...
With no deterrent effect, the WTO dispute settlement crisis leaves US exporters exposed, especially US agriculture
With no deterrent effect, the WTO dispute settlement crisis leaves US exporters exposed, especially US agriculture
The absence of a functioning Appellate Body at the World Trade Organization (WTO) leaves the dispute settlement mechanism weakened, and countries may be more likely to pursue their...
TRADE REMEDIES AND DISPUTE SETTLEMENT MECHANISMS UNDER THE AfCFTA, WTO AND ECOWAS REGIMES
TRADE REMEDIES AND DISPUTE SETTLEMENT MECHANISMS UNDER THE AfCFTA, WTO AND ECOWAS REGIMES
Trade remedies and dispute settlement mechanisms play a central role in maintaining fairness, predictability, and stability within international and regional trade regimes. These m...
Sustaining Multilateralism from the Bench
Sustaining Multilateralism from the Bench
The ever-increasing surge in regional trade agreements (RTAs) over the past two decades has generated growing friction between regionalism and multilateralism in international econ...

