Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Outcomes of urgent versus nonurgent transcatheter aortic valve replacement

View through CrossRef
AbstractBackgroundThere is a paucity of data regarding the outcomes of transcatheter valve replacement (TAVR) performed in an urgent clinical setting.MethodsThe Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database years 2011–2014 was used to identify hospitalizations for TAVR in the urgent setting. Using propensity score matching, we compared patients who underwent TAVR in nonurgent versus urgent settings.ResultsAmong 42,154 hospitalizations in which TAVR was performed, 10,114 (24%) underwent urgent TAVR. There was an uptrend in the rate of urgent TAVR procedures (p = .001). The rates of in‐hospital mortality among this group did not change during the study period (p = .713). Nonurgent TAVR was associated with lower mortality (odds ratio [OR] = 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.69–0.89, p < .001) compared with urgent TAVR. Nonurgent TAVR was associated with lower incidence of cardiogenic shock (OR = 0.46; 95%CI: 0.40–0.53 p < .001), use of mechanical circulatory support devices (OR = 0.69; 95%CI: 0.59–0.82, p < .001), AKI (OR = 0.60; 95%CI: 0.56–0.64 p < .001), hemodialysis (OR = 0.67; 95%CI: 0.56–0.80 p < .001), major bleeding (OR = 0.94; 95%CI: 0.89–0.99 p = .045) and shorter length of stay (7.08 ± 6.317 vs. 12.39 ± 9.737 days, p < .001). There was no difference in acute stroke (OR = 0.96; 95%CI: 0.81–1.14, p = .636), vascular complications (OR = 1.07; 95%CI: 0.89–1.29, p = .492), and pacemaker insertions (OR = 0.92; 95%CI: 0.84–1.01, p = .067) between both groups. Among those undergoing urgent TAVR, subgroup analysis showed higher mortality in patients ≤80 years (p = .033), women (p < .001), chronic kidney disease (p = .001), heart failure (p < .001), and liver disease (p = .003).ConclusionIn this large nationwide analysis, almost a quarter of TAVR procedures were performed in the urgent settings. Although urgent TAVR was associated with higher mortality and increased complications compared with nonurgent TAVR, the absolute difference in in‐hospital mortality was not remarkably higher. Thus, urgent TAVR can be considered as a reasonable approach when indicated.
Title: Outcomes of urgent versus nonurgent transcatheter aortic valve replacement
Description:
AbstractBackgroundThere is a paucity of data regarding the outcomes of transcatheter valve replacement (TAVR) performed in an urgent clinical setting.
MethodsThe Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database years 2011–2014 was used to identify hospitalizations for TAVR in the urgent setting.
Using propensity score matching, we compared patients who underwent TAVR in nonurgent versus urgent settings.
ResultsAmong 42,154 hospitalizations in which TAVR was performed, 10,114 (24%) underwent urgent TAVR.
There was an uptrend in the rate of urgent TAVR procedures (p = .
001).
The rates of in‐hospital mortality among this group did not change during the study period (p = .
713).
Nonurgent TAVR was associated with lower mortality (odds ratio [OR] = 0.
78; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.
69–0.
89, p < .
001) compared with urgent TAVR.
Nonurgent TAVR was associated with lower incidence of cardiogenic shock (OR = 0.
46; 95%CI: 0.
40–0.
53 p < .
001), use of mechanical circulatory support devices (OR = 0.
69; 95%CI: 0.
59–0.
82, p < .
001), AKI (OR = 0.
60; 95%CI: 0.
56–0.
64 p < .
001), hemodialysis (OR = 0.
67; 95%CI: 0.
56–0.
80 p < .
001), major bleeding (OR = 0.
94; 95%CI: 0.
89–0.
99 p = .
045) and shorter length of stay (7.
08 ± 6.
317 vs.
12.
39 ± 9.
737 days, p < .
001).
There was no difference in acute stroke (OR = 0.
96; 95%CI: 0.
81–1.
14, p = .
636), vascular complications (OR = 1.
07; 95%CI: 0.
89–1.
29, p = .
492), and pacemaker insertions (OR = 0.
92; 95%CI: 0.
84–1.
01, p = .
067) between both groups.
Among those undergoing urgent TAVR, subgroup analysis showed higher mortality in patients ≤80 years (p = .
033), women (p < .
001), chronic kidney disease (p = .
001), heart failure (p < .
001), and liver disease (p = .
003).
ConclusionIn this large nationwide analysis, almost a quarter of TAVR procedures were performed in the urgent settings.
Although urgent TAVR was associated with higher mortality and increased complications compared with nonurgent TAVR, the absolute difference in in‐hospital mortality was not remarkably higher.
Thus, urgent TAVR can be considered as a reasonable approach when indicated.

Related Results

Abstract 4369914: Successful Transfemoral TAVR in a Patient with Chronic Aortic Dissection and Severe Aortic Insufficiency
Abstract 4369914: Successful Transfemoral TAVR in a Patient with Chronic Aortic Dissection and Severe Aortic Insufficiency
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement is a well-established treatment for high-surgical-risk patients with severe aortic disease, providing a less invasive alternative to traditio...
AORTIC ROOT ANEURYSM OR ECTASIA TREATED WITH AORTIC ROOT WRAPPED PROCEDURE
AORTIC ROOT ANEURYSM OR ECTASIA TREATED WITH AORTIC ROOT WRAPPED PROCEDURE
Objectives To develop a relatively simple and effective and less risk operation, aortic root wrapped procedure, to treat with aortic root aneurysm or ectasia. ...
The Critical Role of Presettable and Expandable Artificial Surgical Valves in the Lifetime Management of Valvular Heart Disease
The Critical Role of Presettable and Expandable Artificial Surgical Valves in the Lifetime Management of Valvular Heart Disease
With the trend of younger patients undergoing surgical valve replacement and increased life expectancy, how to account for subsequent therapies during the initial valve replacement...
Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement by Congenital Heart Surgeons: A Single Center Experience.
Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement by Congenital Heart Surgeons: A Single Center Experience.
Background Aortic root dilatation and aortic insufficiency can occur in patients with prior conotruncal defect surgery, the Ross procedure, and connective tissue ...
Aortic root wrapped procedure
Aortic root wrapped procedure
Objective To develop a relatively simple and effective and less risk operation, aortic root wrapped procedure, to treat with aortic root aneurysm or ectasia. ...

Back to Top