Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The Impact of the Implementation of the Principle of Separation of Powers on Achieving Democracy in Contemporary Political Systems: A Comparative Study Between Presidential and Semi-Presidential Systems (Using the Turkish and French Systems as Models).
View through CrossRef
The objective of this study was to elucidate the principle of separation of powers and examine the structure and functions of the three branches of government in modern political systems, specifically the presidential and semi-presidential systems, by comparing the Turkish presidential system with the French semi-presidential system. The study employed comparative techniques and the descriptive-analytical method to attain its objectives. The study concluded that the effective implementation of the separation of powers principle in modern political systems is essential for achieving the desired democracy globally.
The study demonstrated the presence of parallels in the implementation of the principle of separation of powers within the Turkish and French systems, especially with the establishment of the executive and judicial branches, as well as the authorities of the legislative and judicial branches in both systems. The study demonstrated that the Turkish presidential system has attained comprehensive democracy through the effective implementation of the separation of powers concept, in contrast to the French semi-presidential system, which has forfeited its constitutional and comprehensive democratic essence. This is evident in the establishment of the French legislative branch, which was not formed entirely by popular election. This branch is divided into two components: the National Assembly, formed through direct popular elections, and the Senate, created through elections for specific categories, consisting of senators, representatives of councils of French expatriates, and municipal councilors, without a general referendum, which violates the principle of separation of powers.
A closer examination highlights the intervention of the executive branch in the judicial domain within the French semi-presidential system. This is evident in the authority granted to the French president to issue pardons in specific cases after judicial decisions have already been rendered. Such authority challenges the proper application of the principle of separation Of powers.
Noor Al-Ilm for Publishing and Distribution
Title: The Impact of the Implementation of the Principle of Separation of Powers on Achieving Democracy in Contemporary Political Systems: A Comparative Study Between Presidential and Semi-Presidential Systems (Using the Turkish and French Systems as Models).
Description:
The objective of this study was to elucidate the principle of separation of powers and examine the structure and functions of the three branches of government in modern political systems, specifically the presidential and semi-presidential systems, by comparing the Turkish presidential system with the French semi-presidential system.
The study employed comparative techniques and the descriptive-analytical method to attain its objectives.
The study concluded that the effective implementation of the separation of powers principle in modern political systems is essential for achieving the desired democracy globally.
The study demonstrated the presence of parallels in the implementation of the principle of separation of powers within the Turkish and French systems, especially with the establishment of the executive and judicial branches, as well as the authorities of the legislative and judicial branches in both systems.
The study demonstrated that the Turkish presidential system has attained comprehensive democracy through the effective implementation of the separation of powers concept, in contrast to the French semi-presidential system, which has forfeited its constitutional and comprehensive democratic essence.
This is evident in the establishment of the French legislative branch, which was not formed entirely by popular election.
This branch is divided into two components: the National Assembly, formed through direct popular elections, and the Senate, created through elections for specific categories, consisting of senators, representatives of councils of French expatriates, and municipal councilors, without a general referendum, which violates the principle of separation of powers.
A closer examination highlights the intervention of the executive branch in the judicial domain within the French semi-presidential system.
This is evident in the authority granted to the French president to issue pardons in specific cases after judicial decisions have already been rendered.
Such authority challenges the proper application of the principle of separation Of powers.
Related Results
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
In a comprehensive and at times critical manner, this volume seeks to shed light on the development of events in Western (i.e., European and North American) comparative literature ...
TÜRK LEHÇELERİNİN DİL EVRENSELLERİ (TİPOLOJİLERİ) ÜZERİNE BİR DENEME
TÜRK LEHÇELERİNİN DİL EVRENSELLERİ (TİPOLOJİLERİ) ÜZERİNE BİR DENEME
Lahiri and Plank (2009) want linguistic universals to be true not for the
languages we know, but for every variety of every known language (dialect/mouth, 'dialect',
social class l...
What Causes Democracy?
What Causes Democracy?
In pointing to a definition of “democracy,” there is no single concept of the term on which all scholars agree. The question of “what a democracy is … and is not,” to borrow the ti...
Turkish and Turkish Culture Textbooks Prepared for Bilingual Turkish Children Investigation of Proverb Teaching
Turkish and Turkish Culture Textbooks Prepared for Bilingual Turkish Children Investigation of Proverb Teaching
Language is the most important means of communication and the protector and transmitter of culture. The individual recognizes his/her past and language education is an important to...
Semi-Presidential Systems
Semi-Presidential Systems
Semi-presidentialism has become a widespread form of government in recent decades. If we use Robert Elgie’s frequently cited definition, semi-presidentialism is where the constitut...
Kaleidoscopic Leadership in Contemporary Democracies
Kaleidoscopic Leadership in Contemporary Democracies
Democratic theory and leadership studies are closely related. Yet, the idea of democratic leadership is inherently paradoxical. Whereas the concept of democracy rests on the idea o...
VARIABILITY OF MODERN DEMOCRACY: A BRIEF ANALYSIS
VARIABILITY OF MODERN DEMOCRACY: A BRIEF ANALYSIS
It is noted that at present, Ukraine, due to the actualization of the search for a future path in the conditions of uncertainty of the existential situation, has once again found i...

