Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Ecology as Aesthetic Practice Emotions and Relationality in Arne Næss’s Deep Ecology
View through CrossRef
This article explores the pivotal role of aesthetic experience, emotions, and relationality in Arne Næss’s philosophy of Deep Ecology. Challenging the traditional dualism between reason and emotion, the paper argues that ecological awareness and ethical commitment emerge from an embodied, aesthetic mode of engagement with the world. Drawing on phenomenological insights and Gestalt theory, it highlights how perceiving the environment as an interconnected whole transforms the subject’s sense of self and fosters a joyful, affective connection with nature. For Næss, reconnecting with these essential relationships involves a deep understanding that our very identities are intricately shaped by the ecological contexts in which we dwell. The fresh air we breathe, the nourishing food we consume, and the diverse environments we inhabit each contribute to the essence of who we are as individuals. This vision resonates powerfully with the Stoic concept of oikeiosis, which emphasises the importance of growing familiar with and emotionally attuned to the world around us, fostering a sense of belonging within it. Within this rich framework, emotions play a crucial role. Central to this argument is the concept of hilaritas – the joyous recognition of belonging to the broader ecological community, which grounds ecological responsibility and sustained environmental action. By situating Næss’s ecosophy within a wider philosophical lineage that includes Spinoza and contemporary theories of atmosphere and affect, the article proposes an ecological aesthetics that is simultaneously a practice of ethical relationality and embodied joy. This approach offers new perspectives on how aesthetic sensibility can catalyse deeper environmental engagement in the Anthropocene.
Title: Ecology as Aesthetic Practice Emotions and Relationality in Arne Næss’s Deep Ecology
Description:
This article explores the pivotal role of aesthetic experience, emotions, and relationality in Arne Næss’s philosophy of Deep Ecology.
Challenging the traditional dualism between reason and emotion, the paper argues that ecological awareness and ethical commitment emerge from an embodied, aesthetic mode of engagement with the world.
Drawing on phenomenological insights and Gestalt theory, it highlights how perceiving the environment as an interconnected whole transforms the subject’s sense of self and fosters a joyful, affective connection with nature.
For Næss, reconnecting with these essential relationships involves a deep understanding that our very identities are intricately shaped by the ecological contexts in which we dwell.
The fresh air we breathe, the nourishing food we consume, and the diverse environments we inhabit each contribute to the essence of who we are as individuals.
This vision resonates powerfully with the Stoic concept of oikeiosis, which emphasises the importance of growing familiar with and emotionally attuned to the world around us, fostering a sense of belonging within it.
Within this rich framework, emotions play a crucial role.
Central to this argument is the concept of hilaritas – the joyous recognition of belonging to the broader ecological community, which grounds ecological responsibility and sustained environmental action.
By situating Næss’s ecosophy within a wider philosophical lineage that includes Spinoza and contemporary theories of atmosphere and affect, the article proposes an ecological aesthetics that is simultaneously a practice of ethical relationality and embodied joy.
This approach offers new perspectives on how aesthetic sensibility can catalyse deeper environmental engagement in the Anthropocene.
Related Results
The Theatre Career of Thomas Arne
The Theatre Career of Thomas Arne
This book concerns the life and theatrical career of the great native-born English composer and musician of the eighteenth century, Thomas Augustine Arne (1710-1778). Its purpose i...
Between Beautiful and Moral Action
Between Beautiful and Moral Action
In this paper, the author reflects on Immanuel Kant’s distinction between beautiful and moral action, and its influence on Arne Næss’s ecological thought. By referring to Næss’s in...
Aesthetic attitude
Aesthetic attitude
It is undeniable that there are aesthetic and non-aesthetic attitudes. But is there such a thing as the aesthetic attitude? What is meant by the aesthetic attitude is the particula...
Relationality Design and Relationality-oriented Systems Design
Relationality Design and Relationality-oriented Systems Design
Relationality-oriented system science introduced here is a new research field where we try to understand and grasp systems as substance in which humans, tangible and intangible art...
Emotions and Networked Learning
Emotions and Networked Learning
Emotions in networked learning have been underresearched despite their importance. The present research is one of the first few attempts to better understand adult learners’ emotio...
A Study on the Innovative Development Path of Higher Aesthetic Education in Greater Bay Area from the Perspective of Cultural Confidence
A Study on the Innovative Development Path of Higher Aesthetic Education in Greater Bay Area from the Perspective of Cultural Confidence
To build the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area into an international education demonstration plot is inseparable from the innovative development of higher aesthetic educat...
Emotions in Humans and Artifacts
Emotions in Humans and Artifacts
Emotions as seen, analyzed, and modelled by scientists, artists, philosophers, and engineers.
Emotions have been much studied and discussed in recent years. Most boo...
Mixed Emotional Structure of Paintings
Mixed Emotional Structure of Paintings
Mixed emotions are strongly linked to aesthetic emotions, which involve both positive and negative emotional experiences. Mixed emotions are aroused as complex emotional reactions ...


