Javascript must be enabled to continue!
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE APPLICATION IN COLONOSCOPY SCREENING: A LITERATURE REVIEW
View through CrossRef
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer globally and remains a leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Despite the effectiveness of colonoscopy in reducing CRC incidence and mortality through adenoma removal, some polyps are frequently missed. Artificial intelligence (AI) has recently appeared as a promising tool to enhance detection rates during colonoscopy.
Aim of the study: This study aims to compare AI-assisted colonoscopy with standard colonoscopy in terms of adenoma detection rate and polyp detection rate. The goal is to evaluate whether one approach is superior to the other.
Material and methods: A systematic literature search of the PubMed database was performed for studies published between 2015 and 2025. Search terms included “artificial intelligence”, “machine learning”, “colonoscopy”, and “mass screening”. Only English-language studies directly comparing adenoma and polyp detection rates between AI and standard colonoscopy procedures were included. A total of 18 studies involving 12,000 patients met the inclusion criteria.
Results: The AI group consistently demonstrated higher adenoma detection rates compared to the standard colonoscopy group, with 36.06% vs. 28.85%, respectively. Similarly, AI showcased greater polyp detection rates, detecting polyps in 41.05% of patients compared to 34.17% in the standard colonoscopy group. Advanced AI techniques reported the highest detection rates. AI showed enhanced performance in identifying diminutive lesions and polyps located in challenging regions. Importantly, AI did not significantly prolong withdrawal times.
Conclusions: AI integration into colonoscopy improves adenoma and polyp detection rates across diverse patient populations and clinical settings. Even among experienced endoscopists, AI provides added diagnostic value. The findings highlight AI’s potential to enhance CRC screening, though further studies are needed to standardize AI tools, validate their efficacy in real-world settings, and assess long-term clinical outcomes.
Title: ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE APPLICATION IN COLONOSCOPY SCREENING: A LITERATURE REVIEW
Description:
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer globally and remains a leading cause of cancer-related deaths.
Despite the effectiveness of colonoscopy in reducing CRC incidence and mortality through adenoma removal, some polyps are frequently missed.
Artificial intelligence (AI) has recently appeared as a promising tool to enhance detection rates during colonoscopy.
Aim of the study: This study aims to compare AI-assisted colonoscopy with standard colonoscopy in terms of adenoma detection rate and polyp detection rate.
The goal is to evaluate whether one approach is superior to the other.
Material and methods: A systematic literature search of the PubMed database was performed for studies published between 2015 and 2025.
Search terms included “artificial intelligence”, “machine learning”, “colonoscopy”, and “mass screening”.
Only English-language studies directly comparing adenoma and polyp detection rates between AI and standard colonoscopy procedures were included.
A total of 18 studies involving 12,000 patients met the inclusion criteria.
Results: The AI group consistently demonstrated higher adenoma detection rates compared to the standard colonoscopy group, with 36.
06% vs.
28.
85%, respectively.
Similarly, AI showcased greater polyp detection rates, detecting polyps in 41.
05% of patients compared to 34.
17% in the standard colonoscopy group.
Advanced AI techniques reported the highest detection rates.
AI showed enhanced performance in identifying diminutive lesions and polyps located in challenging regions.
Importantly, AI did not significantly prolong withdrawal times.
Conclusions: AI integration into colonoscopy improves adenoma and polyp detection rates across diverse patient populations and clinical settings.
Even among experienced endoscopists, AI provides added diagnostic value.
The findings highlight AI’s potential to enhance CRC screening, though further studies are needed to standardize AI tools, validate their efficacy in real-world settings, and assess long-term clinical outcomes.
Related Results
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Screening Colonoscopy Uptake Among Adult Stroke Survivors: Findings from the 2022 BRFSS Data
Screening Colonoscopy Uptake Among Adult Stroke Survivors: Findings from the 2022 BRFSS Data
Background/Objectives: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally. Screening for cancer helps to prevent comorbid conditions among indivi...
1175 Ileal Carcinoid Tumors Detected During Screening versus Diagnostic Colonoscopy: Comparison of Tumor Characteristics
1175 Ileal Carcinoid Tumors Detected During Screening versus Diagnostic Colonoscopy: Comparison of Tumor Characteristics
INTRODUCTION:
Small intestinal carcinoid tumors are the most common type of small bowel malignancy observed. Most are indolent and incidentally found in asymptomatic pa...
Ileal neuroendocrine tumors detected during screening or diagnostic colonoscopy – case series and comparison of tumor characteristics.
Ileal neuroendocrine tumors detected during screening or diagnostic colonoscopy – case series and comparison of tumor characteristics.
Abstract
Purpose: Small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors are the most common type of small bowel malignancy observed. Ileal tumors are often found in patients undergoing il...
2843 Lack of Knowledge About Follow-Up Colonoscopy in Patients With Biopsy Proven Advanced Colorectal Polyps: A Major Clinical and Medicolegal Challenge
2843 Lack of Knowledge About Follow-Up Colonoscopy in Patients With Biopsy Proven Advanced Colorectal Polyps: A Major Clinical and Medicolegal Challenge
INTRODUCTION:
The most recent guidelines from the American College of Gastroenterology recommend that patients with biopsy proven advanced colorectal polyps undergo rep...
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
In a comprehensive and at times critical manner, this volume seeks to shed light on the development of events in Western (i.e., European and North American) comparative literature ...
Indications and Diagnostic Yield of Colonoscopy in Kano, Nigeria
Indications and Diagnostic Yield of Colonoscopy in Kano, Nigeria
Context:
Colonoscopy is the investigation of choice for colonic lesions and has been widely used to diagnose and treat various colonic diseases. As essential as it is, ...
Lower Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Lower Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Since the advent of the first flexible fiberoptic sigmoidoscope in 1967, lower gastrointestinal endoscopy equipment has technologically advanced and is used for a number of diagnos...

