Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Assessing competitiveness and complementarity in agricultural trade between China and Cambodia pre-pandemic and post-pandemic

View through CrossRef
The concepts of trade competitiveness and complementarity function as key indicators for assessing the strengths and weaknesses of a nation’s export profile, as well as predicting future trade trajectories. Analyzing the levels of competitiveness and complementarity within the agricultural sectors of Cambodia and China is imperative for understanding and comparing their respective competitive advantages. This study utilizes quantitative research methodologies to analyze the agricultural trade dynamics between China and Cambodia before and after the pandemic. Specifically, the research involves the calculation of the revealed comparative advantage (RCA) index, the trade complementarity index (TCI), the trade intensity index (TII), and the Grubel-Lloyd (GL) index, covering the period from 2017 to 2022. The data is from the UN Commodity Trade Statistics Database through the HS code 1-24. The study used a three-year period as a short research phase and applied two phases to compare pre-pandemic and post-pandemic. The empirical results demonstrated that China and Cambodia both exhibit a strong comparative advantage in exporting specific items. From 2017 to 2019, China has comparative advantages in exporting HS items 05,13 and 16, and Cambodia has comparative advantages in exporting HS items 10,11 and 17. From 2020 to 2022, China has a comparative advantage in exporting HS item 13, and Cambodia has a comparative advantage in exporting HS item 10. Both China and Cambodia have specific complementary agricultural items in bilateral agricultural exports from 2017 to 2019, but China does not have complementary exports in its exports and Cambodia’s imports from 2020 to 2022. The trade intensity index underscores the advantages of their bilateral trade in the direction of China’s exports to Cambodia. Inter-industry advantages are identified in specific agricultural products. This study is beneficial for the Cambodian government and relevant stakeholders in formulating sustainable policies to promote agricultural trade after pandemic. The insights derived from these indices will furnish a rigorous foundation upon which the Cambodian government can develop and implement evidence-based sustainable strategies to optimize and enhance its agricultural trade performance.
Title: Assessing competitiveness and complementarity in agricultural trade between China and Cambodia pre-pandemic and post-pandemic
Description:
The concepts of trade competitiveness and complementarity function as key indicators for assessing the strengths and weaknesses of a nation’s export profile, as well as predicting future trade trajectories.
Analyzing the levels of competitiveness and complementarity within the agricultural sectors of Cambodia and China is imperative for understanding and comparing their respective competitive advantages.
This study utilizes quantitative research methodologies to analyze the agricultural trade dynamics between China and Cambodia before and after the pandemic.
Specifically, the research involves the calculation of the revealed comparative advantage (RCA) index, the trade complementarity index (TCI), the trade intensity index (TII), and the Grubel-Lloyd (GL) index, covering the period from 2017 to 2022.
The data is from the UN Commodity Trade Statistics Database through the HS code 1-24.
The study used a three-year period as a short research phase and applied two phases to compare pre-pandemic and post-pandemic.
The empirical results demonstrated that China and Cambodia both exhibit a strong comparative advantage in exporting specific items.
From 2017 to 2019, China has comparative advantages in exporting HS items 05,13 and 16, and Cambodia has comparative advantages in exporting HS items 10,11 and 17.
From 2020 to 2022, China has a comparative advantage in exporting HS item 13, and Cambodia has a comparative advantage in exporting HS item 10.
Both China and Cambodia have specific complementary agricultural items in bilateral agricultural exports from 2017 to 2019, but China does not have complementary exports in its exports and Cambodia’s imports from 2020 to 2022.
The trade intensity index underscores the advantages of their bilateral trade in the direction of China’s exports to Cambodia.
Inter-industry advantages are identified in specific agricultural products.
This study is beneficial for the Cambodian government and relevant stakeholders in formulating sustainable policies to promote agricultural trade after pandemic.
The insights derived from these indices will furnish a rigorous foundation upon which the Cambodian government can develop and implement evidence-based sustainable strategies to optimize and enhance its agricultural trade performance.

Related Results

Analysis of the current situation of agricultural trade development between China and Ukraine
Analysis of the current situation of agricultural trade development between China and Ukraine
Purpose. As a European granary, Ukraine has rich agricultural resources. China is a country with a large population and has a large demand for food. However, the agricultural trade...
PRIORITIES AND MECHANISMS FOR BALANCING THE FOREIGN TRADE IN AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS BASED ON COMPLEMENTARITY
PRIORITIES AND MECHANISMS FOR BALANCING THE FOREIGN TRADE IN AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS BASED ON COMPLEMENTARITY
The research paper aims at carrying out a systematic analysis of the complementarity of foreign trade in agricultural products and to substantiate on this basis the priorities for ...
Is trade dispute a major factor influencing the complementarity of Sino-US solar PV products trade?
Is trade dispute a major factor influencing the complementarity of Sino-US solar PV products trade?
Purpose Through empirical analysis of Sino-US solar photovoltaic (PV) trade, this paper aims to evaluate the complementarity of Sino-US solar PV trade by adopting trade combination...
Analysis of the Impact of Agricultural Products Import Trade on Agricultural Carbon Productivity: Empirical Evidence from China
Analysis of the Impact of Agricultural Products Import Trade on Agricultural Carbon Productivity: Empirical Evidence from China
Abstract To realize the goal of “dual carbon”, China urgently needs to seek the path of low-carbon agricultural development. The existing agricultural trade deficit in Chin...
Leveraging Trade for Economic Growth in Cambodia
Leveraging Trade for Economic Growth in Cambodia
This paper attempts to answer three important questions: (1) Why does trade matter? (2) Whyis trade vital for Cambodia’s growth? (3) What policy priorities for Cambodia will make t...
Cambodia’s Skill Gap: An Anatomy of Issues and Policy Options
Cambodia’s Skill Gap: An Anatomy of Issues and Policy Options
There is growing consensus that an emerging skill gap could impose human costs and constraints on Cambodia’s economic growth and development. The country is facing a shortage of sk...
[RETRACTED] Keanu Reeves CBD Gummies v1
[RETRACTED] Keanu Reeves CBD Gummies v1
[RETRACTED]Keanu Reeves CBD Gummies ==❱❱ Huge Discounts:[HURRY UP ] Absolute Keanu Reeves CBD Gummies (Available)Order Online Only!! ❰❰= https://www.facebook.com/Keanu-Reeves-CBD-G...
Variation-based complementarity assessment between wind and solar resources in China
Variation-based complementarity assessment between wind and solar resources in China
The complementarity between wind and solar resources is considered one of the factors that restrict the utilization of intermittent renewable power sources such as these, but the t...

Back to Top