Javascript must be enabled to continue!
A Review on Tactile Displays for Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery
View through CrossRef
Laparoscopic surgery (LS) is a minimally invasive technique that offers many advantages over traditional open surgery: it reduces trauma, scarring, and shortens recovery time. However, an important limitation is the loss of tactile sensations. Although some progress has been made in robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery (RMIS) setups, RMIS is still not widely accessible. This review aims to identify which tactile display technologies have been proposed and experimentally validated for the restoration of tactile sensations during conventional laparoscopic surgical tasks. We conducted a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We identified relevant articles published over the past 10 years through a search on Web of science, Scopus, IEEE Xplore Digital, and PubMed repositories. A total of 143 articles met the inclusion criteria and 24 were included in the final review. From the reviewed articles, we classified the proposed tactile displays into two categories based on the use of skin contact: (i) skin tactile displays, which include vibrotactile, skin-indentation, and grip-feedback devices, and (ii) non-contact tactile displays based on visualization tools. This survey aims to contribute to further research in the area of tactile displays for laparoscopic surgery by providing a better understanding of the current state of the art and identifying the remaining challenges.
Title: A Review on Tactile Displays for Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery
Description:
Laparoscopic surgery (LS) is a minimally invasive technique that offers many advantages over traditional open surgery: it reduces trauma, scarring, and shortens recovery time.
However, an important limitation is the loss of tactile sensations.
Although some progress has been made in robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery (RMIS) setups, RMIS is still not widely accessible.
This review aims to identify which tactile display technologies have been proposed and experimentally validated for the restoration of tactile sensations during conventional laparoscopic surgical tasks.
We conducted a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.
We identified relevant articles published over the past 10 years through a search on Web of science, Scopus, IEEE Xplore Digital, and PubMed repositories.
A total of 143 articles met the inclusion criteria and 24 were included in the final review.
From the reviewed articles, we classified the proposed tactile displays into two categories based on the use of skin contact: (i) skin tactile displays, which include vibrotactile, skin-indentation, and grip-feedback devices, and (ii) non-contact tactile displays based on visualization tools.
This survey aims to contribute to further research in the area of tactile displays for laparoscopic surgery by providing a better understanding of the current state of the art and identifying the remaining challenges.
Related Results
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
An assessment of the learning curve for laparoscopic and total laparoscopic hysterectomy
An assessment of the learning curve for laparoscopic and total laparoscopic hysterectomy
ObjectiveTo determine guidelines for an appropriate learning curve for laparoscopic hysterectomy for novice and experienced surgeons.DesignAn analysis of the first year of practice...
Navigation with laparoscopic ultrasound during fundus-first laparoscopic cholecystectomy-a single-centre retrospective case control study
Navigation with laparoscopic ultrasound during fundus-first laparoscopic cholecystectomy-a single-centre retrospective case control study
Abstract
Background
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is considered as the gold standard treatment for cholecystolithiasis. The critical view of safety is a generally accepted ...
Tactile direction discrimination in humans after stroke
Tactile direction discrimination in humans after stroke
Abstract
Sensing movements across the skin surface is a complex task for the tactile sensory system, relying on sophisticated cortical processing. Functional MRI has...
COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN RIGHT HEMICOLECTOMY IN PATIENTS OF ASCENDING COLON TUMOR
COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN RIGHT HEMICOLECTOMY IN PATIENTS OF ASCENDING COLON TUMOR
Background: In addition to rectum, ascending colon and caecum can also develop cancer. Right hemicolectomy is the operation of choice for later two. Laparoscopic right hemicolecto...
<b>COMAPRISON OF OUTCOMES IN LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY VS OPEN APPENDECTOMY</b>
<b>COMAPRISON OF OUTCOMES IN LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY VS OPEN APPENDECTOMY</b>
Introduction: Acute appendicitis is a surgical emergency that is amongst the most frequently performed all over the globe, with open appendectomy being the conventional treatment. ...
Comparisons of postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery using inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis: an evidence from Iran
Comparisons of postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery using inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis: an evidence from Iran
Abstract
Background
Colorectal cancer has created a significant burden worldwide, including in Iran. Open and laparoscopic surgery are important tre...
Ramifications of Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery
Ramifications of Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery
Introduction. Single-port laparoscopic surgery imposes unique psychomotor challenges. We used surgical simulation to define performance differences between surgeons with and withou...

