Signal‐to‐noise ratio behavior of steady‐state free precession

AbstractSteady‐state free precession (SSFP) is a rapid gradient‐echo imaging technique that has recently gained popularity and is used in a variety of applications, including cardiac and real‐time imaging, because of its high signal and favorable contrast between blood and myocardium. The purpose of this work was to examine the signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) behavior of images acquired with SSFP, and the dependence of SNR on imaging parameters such as TR, bandwidth, and image resolution, and the use of multi‐echo sequences. In this work it is shown that the SNR of SSFP sequences is dependent only on pulse sequence efficiency, voxel dimensions, and relaxation parameters (T1 and T2). Notably, SNR is insensitive to bandwidth unless increases in bandwidth significantly decrease efficiency. Finally, we examined the relationship between pulse sequence performance (TR and efficiency) and gradient performance (maximum gradient strength and slew rate) for several imaging scenarios, including multi‐echo sequences, to determine the optimum matching of maximum gradient strength and slew rate for gradient hardware designs. For standard modern gradient hardware (40 mT/m and 150 mT/m/ms), we found that the maximum gradient strength is more than adequate for the imaging resolution that is commonly encountered with rapid scouting (3 mm × 4 mm × 10 mm voxel). It is well matched for typical CINE and real‐time cardiac imaging applications (1.5 mm × 2 mm × 6 mm voxel), and is inadequate for optimal matching with slew rate for high‐resolution applications such as musculoskeletal imaging (0.5 × 0.8 × 3 mm voxel). For the lower‐resolution methods, efficiency could be improved with higher slew rates; this provokes interest in designing methods for limiting dB/dt peripherally while achieving high switching rates in the imaging field of view. The use of multi‐echo SSFP acquisitions leads to substantial improvements in sequence performance (i.e., increased efficiency and shorter TR). Magn Reson Med 52:123–130, 2004. Published 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.