Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Scholia, Commentaries, and Lexica on Specific Literary Works
View through CrossRef
Abstract
This category includes the most famous and most often cited scholia. By far the most important are the Homer scholia, but those on Pindar and the Attic dramatists are also significant. Ancient scholarship on Homer was extensive and of high quality, for the best scholars of antiquity devoted much of their time and energy to the Homeric poems. Work on Homer that could be described as scholarship goes back at least to the classical period and probably to the sixth century bc, and editing the text of Homer was one of the main tasks of the first Alexandrian scholars. Zenodotus, Aristophanes of Byzantium, and Aristarchus probably all produced editions of the Iliad and Odyssey, and Aristarchus wrote extensive commentaries, while Zenodotus and Aristophanes compiled glossaries of primarily Homeric words. In addition, the early and persistent use of Homer as a school text meant that there was a tradition of school exegesis that reached back as far as the classical period. Though none of the very early work on Homer survives in its original form, a surprising amount is preserved in various later compilations, so we often know, for example, the readings of several different Alexandrian scholars for a particular passage, and even some of the arguments behind these readings (although the arguments preserved in later sources cannot always be assumed to be those of the editor himself). Two principal sources for the ancient scholarship on Homer survive: the scholia and Eustathius’ commentaries, both of which are gigantic works filling many volumes in modern editions. There are also some smaller works, some of which are more valuable than others.
Title: Scholia, Commentaries, and Lexica on Specific Literary Works
Description:
Abstract
This category includes the most famous and most often cited scholia.
By far the most important are the Homer scholia, but those on Pindar and the Attic dramatists are also significant.
Ancient scholarship on Homer was extensive and of high quality, for the best scholars of antiquity devoted much of their time and energy to the Homeric poems.
Work on Homer that could be described as scholarship goes back at least to the classical period and probably to the sixth century bc, and editing the text of Homer was one of the main tasks of the first Alexandrian scholars.
Zenodotus, Aristophanes of Byzantium, and Aristarchus probably all produced editions of the Iliad and Odyssey, and Aristarchus wrote extensive commentaries, while Zenodotus and Aristophanes compiled glossaries of primarily Homeric words.
In addition, the early and persistent use of Homer as a school text meant that there was a tradition of school exegesis that reached back as far as the classical period.
Though none of the very early work on Homer survives in its original form, a surprising amount is preserved in various later compilations, so we often know, for example, the readings of several different Alexandrian scholars for a particular passage, and even some of the arguments behind these readings (although the arguments preserved in later sources cannot always be assumed to be those of the editor himself).
Two principal sources for the ancient scholarship on Homer survive: the scholia and Eustathius’ commentaries, both of which are gigantic works filling many volumes in modern editions.
There are also some smaller works, some of which are more valuable than others.
Related Results
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
In a comprehensive and at times critical manner, this volume seeks to shed light on the development of events in Western (i.e., European and North American) comparative literature ...
Recenzja książki: Eleanor Dickey, Ancient Greek scholarship: a guide to finding, reading and understanding scholia, commentaries. lexica and grammatical treatises, from their beginnings to the Byzantine period, Oxford University Press, New York 2007, s. 3
Recenzja książki: Eleanor Dickey, Ancient Greek scholarship: a guide to finding, reading and understanding scholia, commentaries. lexica and grammatical treatises, from their beginnings to the Byzantine period, Oxford University Press, New York 2007, s. 3
In this volume are included two flattering reviews, first of Eleanor Dickey, Ancient Greek scholarship: a guide to finding, reading and understanding scholia, commentaries, lexica ...
Of the nomophylax: John Xiphilinos’ scholia on the Basilica
Of the nomophylax: John Xiphilinos’ scholia on the Basilica
Abstract
The aim of the present study is to focus exclusively on the Basilica scholia of John Xiphilinos: to collect and record a list of his scholia and to analyse...
The Manuscripts of Aristophanes, Knights (I)
The Manuscripts of Aristophanes, Knights (I)
The present study of the manuscripts of the Knights arose out of the preparation of a text of the scholia for a forthcoming edition. The completion of a collation of all the manusc...
The Byzantine Scholia to Aristotle and Empedocles’ Cosmic Cycle
The Byzantine Scholia to Aristotle and Empedocles’ Cosmic Cycle
Abstract
Some Byzantine scholia to Aristotle offer numerical indications on the time-length of some phases of Empedocles’ cosmic cycle. In recent years an interpretation has become...
Homeric quotations in the ancient scholia to Hesiod’s poem Works and Days
Homeric quotations in the ancient scholia to Hesiod’s poem Works and Days
In the scholia vetera for Hesiod’s poem Works and Days, 35 verses are explained with a reference to Homer’s poems and one verse is commented on with a reference to Homer as Hesiod’...
The Cultural and Semantic Problems Encountered in Translating the Arabic Qur’anic- Specific Lexica ”Alkyedالكَيْدُ” in Sūrat Yusuf into English
The Cultural and Semantic Problems Encountered in Translating the Arabic Qur’anic- Specific Lexica ”Alkyedالكَيْدُ” in Sūrat Yusuf into English
Translating the Arabic Qur’an-specific lexicon into English has always been an arduous and excellent complex task. It is increasingly problematic than the translation of the Qur’an...

