Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The Byzantine Scholia to Aristotle and Empedocles’ Cosmic Cycle

View through CrossRef
Abstract Some Byzantine scholia to Aristotle offer numerical indications on the time-length of some phases of Empedocles’ cosmic cycle. In recent years an interpretation has become established, according to which the scholia pro-vide evidence for a cycle with three periods: the Sphairos and two opposite phases of Love’s and Strife’s unfolding. This paper emphasizes, in contrast, that the picture of the cycle we can draw from the scholia is not as clear-cut as generally supposed. On the contrary, the scholia can be adapted to dif-ferent, even contrasting, reconstructions of the Empedoclean cycle. Moreo-ver, they seem to challenge the received idea of Empedocles’ cycle as the Sphairos and two symmetrical phases of increasing Love and Strife. Rather, they can conform to a picture of the cycle with two cosmic periods: a period of rest and union under Love (Sphairos) and a period of movement and separation under Strife. Ultimately, this contribution emphasizes the highly problematic nature of the scholia, indicates the difficulties in drawing whole cosmological systems from them and advises against any ‘orthodoxy’ in their interpretation.
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Title: The Byzantine Scholia to Aristotle and Empedocles’ Cosmic Cycle
Description:
Abstract Some Byzantine scholia to Aristotle offer numerical indications on the time-length of some phases of Empedocles’ cosmic cycle.
In recent years an interpretation has become established, according to which the scholia pro-vide evidence for a cycle with three periods: the Sphairos and two opposite phases of Love’s and Strife’s unfolding.
This paper emphasizes, in contrast, that the picture of the cycle we can draw from the scholia is not as clear-cut as generally supposed.
On the contrary, the scholia can be adapted to dif-ferent, even contrasting, reconstructions of the Empedoclean cycle.
Moreo-ver, they seem to challenge the received idea of Empedocles’ cycle as the Sphairos and two symmetrical phases of increasing Love and Strife.
Rather, they can conform to a picture of the cycle with two cosmic periods: a period of rest and union under Love (Sphairos) and a period of movement and separation under Strife.
Ultimately, this contribution emphasizes the highly problematic nature of the scholia, indicates the difficulties in drawing whole cosmological systems from them and advises against any ‘orthodoxy’ in their interpretation.

Related Results

Scholia
Scholia
This chapter provides an introductory overview of early Christian scholia—i.e. brief, preliminary interpretative notes on select passages of Scripture, composed as isolated works o...
Cosmic-ray propagation in the bi-stable interstellar medium
Cosmic-ray propagation in the bi-stable interstellar medium
Context. Cosmic rays propagate through the galactic scales down to the smaller scales at which stars form. Cosmic rays are close to energy equipartition with the other components o...
Peningkatan Prestasi Belajar Materi Bilangan Berpangkat Melalui Model Discovery Learning
Peningkatan Prestasi Belajar Materi Bilangan Berpangkat Melalui Model Discovery Learning
This research is motivated by the unoptimally the mastery of the material is still not optimal exponential number among learners and implementation Discovery learning in mathematic...
Of the nomophylax: John Xiphilinos’ scholia on the Basilica
Of the nomophylax: John Xiphilinos’ scholia on the Basilica
Abstract The aim of the present study is to focus exclusively on the Basilica scholia of John Xiphilinos: to collect and record a list of his scholia and to analyse...
The Manuscripts of Aristophanes, Knights (I)
The Manuscripts of Aristophanes, Knights (I)
The present study of the manuscripts of the Knights arose out of the preparation of a text of the scholia for a forthcoming edition. The completion of a collation of all the manusc...
Simplicius on Empedocles: A note on his commentary in Phys. 157.25–161.20
Simplicius on Empedocles: A note on his commentary in Phys. 157.25–161.20
The present study attempts to show what influence a commentary can have on the formation of ideas about a preceding philosophical tradition. A case in point is Simplicius’ comment...
Reconstructing Empedocles' Thought
Reconstructing Empedocles' Thought
To understand Empedocles' thought, one must view his work as a unified whole of religion and physics. Only a few interpreters, however, recognise rebirth as a positive doctrine wit...
Dating the <I>Homeric Hymn to Selene</I>: Evidence and Implications
Dating the <I>Homeric Hymn to Selene</I>: Evidence and Implications
On the basis of language and allusion, I argue that the Homeric Hymn to Selene (32) should be dated to the early-fifth century BCE or earlier. This runs counter to conventional wis...

Back to Top