Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Joinder of Parties and Group Litigation

View through CrossRef
This chapter in the forthcoming book, COMPARATIVE CIVIL PROCEDURE (Remco Van Rhee and Margaret Y.K. Woo, eds., Elgar Press 2024), addresses the joinder of parties and group litigation in common law and continental civil law countries. The chapter begins with a glossary of terms relating to group litigation, followed by a discussion of the objectives of group litigation, including public and private enforcement, access to justice, judicial economy, and behavior modification and deterrence. The chapter surveys theories and policies of group joinder and collective litigation in common law countries and across the European continent. The chapter turns to in-depth descriptions of group litigation in the United States and other common law jurisdictions including Canada, Australia, and the U.K., with a focus on the American class action rule. This discussion addresses the role of attorneys and attorney fees, the role of judicial officers, litigation and settlement classes, standing, certification of class actions, categories of class litigation, financing, due process requirements, applicable law, settlement, fairness hearings remedies, notice requirements, and the allocation and distribution of class proceeds. In addition, the chapter discusses non-class joinder procedures, such as the American multidistrict litigation procedure, and non-class settlements. The latter portion of the chapter turns attention to parallel developments in the European Union, with a focus on the EU 2013 Recommendations for Collective Redress, the 2018 Implementation Report, and the EU 2020 Representative Actions Directive. Like the analysis of the common law procedural means for achieving group litigation, these sections on European Union developments address the same concerns discussed previously. In addition, the continental discussions comment on due process requirements, the continental preferences for opt-in or opt-out procedures, collective settlements, cross border disputes, and funding and financing. Throughout the chapter the authors cite to leading legislative enactments and decisional case law supporting the concepts relating to joinder of parties and group litigation.
Title: Joinder of Parties and Group Litigation
Description:
This chapter in the forthcoming book, COMPARATIVE CIVIL PROCEDURE (Remco Van Rhee and Margaret Y.
K.
Woo, eds.
, Elgar Press 2024), addresses the joinder of parties and group litigation in common law and continental civil law countries.
The chapter begins with a glossary of terms relating to group litigation, followed by a discussion of the objectives of group litigation, including public and private enforcement, access to justice, judicial economy, and behavior modification and deterrence.
The chapter surveys theories and policies of group joinder and collective litigation in common law countries and across the European continent.
The chapter turns to in-depth descriptions of group litigation in the United States and other common law jurisdictions including Canada, Australia, and the U.
K.
, with a focus on the American class action rule.
This discussion addresses the role of attorneys and attorney fees, the role of judicial officers, litigation and settlement classes, standing, certification of class actions, categories of class litigation, financing, due process requirements, applicable law, settlement, fairness hearings remedies, notice requirements, and the allocation and distribution of class proceeds.
In addition, the chapter discusses non-class joinder procedures, such as the American multidistrict litigation procedure, and non-class settlements.
The latter portion of the chapter turns attention to parallel developments in the European Union, with a focus on the EU 2013 Recommendations for Collective Redress, the 2018 Implementation Report, and the EU 2020 Representative Actions Directive.
Like the analysis of the common law procedural means for achieving group litigation, these sections on European Union developments address the same concerns discussed previously.
In addition, the continental discussions comment on due process requirements, the continental preferences for opt-in or opt-out procedures, collective settlements, cross border disputes, and funding and financing.
Throughout the chapter the authors cite to leading legislative enactments and decisional case law supporting the concepts relating to joinder of parties and group litigation.

Related Results

Patent Litigation and the Internet
Patent Litigation and the Internet
Patent infringement litigation has not only increased dramatically in frequency over the past few decades, but also has also seen striking growth in both stakes and cost. Although ...
A Study on China’s Civil Electronic Litigation System
A Study on China’s Civil Electronic Litigation System
China’s civil electronic litigation system has developed against the backdrop of judicial informatization and the construction of Smart Courts, and has gradually taken institutiona...
The Inclusion of Third Parties (Joinder) in Multi-Party International Arbitration Cases: The Perspective of Indonesian Arbitration
The Inclusion of Third Parties (Joinder) in Multi-Party International Arbitration Cases: The Perspective of Indonesian Arbitration
Indonesia also officially recognizes international arbitration, which is articulated in Article 1 paragraph (9) of the Arbitration Law, as amended following Constitutional Court De...
Młodociani sprawcy przestępstw przeciwko mieniu
Młodociani sprawcy przestępstw przeciwko mieniu
The new Polish penal legislation of 1969 introduced special rules of criminal liability of young adult offenders' aged 17-20. In 1972 criminological research was undertaken in orde...
Diversity Defeated After Trial: May an Appellate Court Vacate a Judgment? 
Diversity Defeated After Trial: May an Appellate Court Vacate a Judgment? 
This article previews the Supreme Court case in <i>The Hains Celestial Group, Inc., Whole Foods Market, Inc. v. Sarah Palmquist</i>., No-24-724, argued to the Court on ...
The Shadows of Litigation Finance
The Shadows of Litigation Finance
Litigation finance is quickly becoming a centerpiece of our legal system. Once a dispute arises, litigants may seek money from third-party financiers to pay their legal bills or mo...
How Patent Strategy Affects the Timing and Method of Patent Litigation Resolution
How Patent Strategy Affects the Timing and Method of Patent Litigation Resolution
Abstract Patent litigation consists of non-market actions that firms undertake to access intellectual property rights defined by prior legislation and enforced by...
Biodiversity Litigation
Biodiversity Litigation
Abstract Biodiversity is declining at an unprecedented speed and urgent action is needed at all levels. Noting the growing influence of climate change litigation as ...

Back to Top