Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The Inclusion of Third Parties (Joinder) in Multi-Party International Arbitration Cases: The Perspective of Indonesian Arbitration
View through CrossRef
Indonesia also officially recognizes international arbitration, which is articulated in Article 1 paragraph (9) of the Arbitration Law, as amended following Constitutional Court Decision No. 100/PUU-XXII/2024. This provision states: "International Arbitral Award is an award rendered by an arbitral institution or a sole arbitrator outside the legal jurisdiction of the Republic of Indonesia, or an award by an arbitral institution or a sole arbitrator which, pursuant to the provisions of the law of the Republic of Indonesia, is deemed to be an International Arbitral Award” (Putusan MK No. 100/PUU-XXII/2024, 2024). The joinder of third parties presents a key challenge in international arbitration due to its conflict with the fundamental principle of party consent. This article examines joinder's application in Indonesian arbitration, specifically analyzing the principles of consent and public order. This research used a normative legal research method, the study analyzes relevant regulations to determine joinder's legality. The findings conclude that the joinder principle is implicitly acknowledged and enforceable in Indonesian arbitration. The article offers an understanding of its implementation and provides recommendations for regulators to ensure legal certainty in Indonesia.
Title: The Inclusion of Third Parties (Joinder) in Multi-Party International Arbitration Cases: The Perspective of Indonesian Arbitration
Description:
Indonesia also officially recognizes international arbitration, which is articulated in Article 1 paragraph (9) of the Arbitration Law, as amended following Constitutional Court Decision No.
100/PUU-XXII/2024.
This provision states: "International Arbitral Award is an award rendered by an arbitral institution or a sole arbitrator outside the legal jurisdiction of the Republic of Indonesia, or an award by an arbitral institution or a sole arbitrator which, pursuant to the provisions of the law of the Republic of Indonesia, is deemed to be an International Arbitral Award” (Putusan MK No.
100/PUU-XXII/2024, 2024).
The joinder of third parties presents a key challenge in international arbitration due to its conflict with the fundamental principle of party consent.
This article examines joinder's application in Indonesian arbitration, specifically analyzing the principles of consent and public order.
This research used a normative legal research method, the study analyzes relevant regulations to determine joinder's legality.
The findings conclude that the joinder principle is implicitly acknowledged and enforceable in Indonesian arbitration.
The article offers an understanding of its implementation and provides recommendations for regulators to ensure legal certainty in Indonesia.
Related Results
The genesis of the concept of international commercial arbitration
The genesis of the concept of international commercial arbitration
This article is dedicated to the study and disclosure of the legal essence of international commercial arbitration as a legal phenomenon representing an alternative method of resol...
International Investment Arbitration
International Investment Arbitration
International investment arbitration is heterogeneous. At its core, it represents the settlement of international investment disputes between foreign investors and host States by a...
THE IMPORTANCE OF ARBITRATION AGREEMENT IN WRITING: INTERNATIONAL, INDONESIA, AND NEW ZEALAND
THE IMPORTANCE OF ARBITRATION AGREEMENT IN WRITING: INTERNATIONAL, INDONESIA, AND NEW ZEALAND
International commercial arbitration has been one of the popular means to solve a dispute, including in Indonesia and New Zealand. In the event the cross-border commercial parties ...
Offensive Arbitration
Offensive Arbitration
The standard critique of binding arbitration for consumer and employment disputes is that arbitration favors defendants. Arbitration often has reduced discovery, shortened statutes...
The Mass Arbitration Illusion
The Mass Arbitration Illusion
Mass arbitration has emerged as the latest battleground in the ongoing tug-of-war between corporations and their consumers and employees regarding binding mandatory arbitration cla...
The Arbitration Clause as Super Contract
The Arbitration Clause as Super Contract
It is widely acknowledged that the purpose of the Federal Arbitration Act was to place arbitration clauses on “equal footing” with other contracts. Nonetheless, federal and state c...
Building a Global International Arbitration Center of China: Independence, Internationalism and Immunity
Building a Global International Arbitration Center of China: Independence, Internationalism and Immunity
This paper explores contemporary issues and provides insights into arbitration as practiced in China’s cross border business and commercial domains. It employs a qualitative method...
Arbitration Effect
Arbitration Effect
Arbitration is changing American law and its justice system. Critics argue that arbitration leads to claim suppression. Proponents contend that it is cheaper and less formal. These...

