Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Comparison between the PaxView TB/NTM MPCR-ULFA Kit and Xpert MTB/RIF for Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Detection in Indonesian Clinical Isolates

View through CrossRef
The PaxView TB/NTM MPCR-ULFA Kit, which targets the IS6110 and mtp40 genes for Mycobacteriumtuberculosis (MTB) detection, is a novel tool that substitutes gel electrophoresis for universal lateral flowassays. The sensitivity and specificity of this method were compared with those of established methodologiesusing Indonesian clinical isolates. In this study, 317 sputum specimens isolated from tuberculosis (TB)suspects were examined to evaluate the performance of the PaxView TB/NTM MPCR-ULFA Kit comparedto that of smear microscopy and the Xpert MTB/RIF assay. Out of 317 cases, the rate of TB-positivesamples evaluated by different methods was 33.4% (106/317; 95% CI 28.2-38.6) for smear microscopy,37.9% (120/317; 95% CI 32.5-43.2) for the Xpert MTB/RIF, and 40.7% (129/317; 95% CI 35.3-46.1) forthe PaxView TB/NTM MPCR-ULFA Kit. Compared to the Xpert MTB/RIF as a standard reference, thePaxView TB/NTM MPCR-ULFA Kit was found to possess a 92.5% sensitivity (111/120; 95% CI 87.8-97.2), a 90.8% specificity (179/197; 95% CI 86.8-94.8), 86.0% PPV (111/129; 95% CI 80.0-92.0), anda NPV 95.2% (179/188; 95% CI 92.2-98.3). The PaxView TB/NTM MPCR-ULFA Kit could be a usefulmolecular diagnostic tool to identify MTB in clinical samples in resource-limited countries, as this procedureis more cost-effective and sensitive than the Xpert MTB/RIF, and more convenient than conventional PCRgel electrophoresis approaches.
Title: Comparison between the PaxView TB/NTM MPCR-ULFA Kit and Xpert MTB/RIF for Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Detection in Indonesian Clinical Isolates
Description:
The PaxView TB/NTM MPCR-ULFA Kit, which targets the IS6110 and mtp40 genes for Mycobacteriumtuberculosis (MTB) detection, is a novel tool that substitutes gel electrophoresis for universal lateral flowassays.
The sensitivity and specificity of this method were compared with those of established methodologiesusing Indonesian clinical isolates.
In this study, 317 sputum specimens isolated from tuberculosis (TB)suspects were examined to evaluate the performance of the PaxView TB/NTM MPCR-ULFA Kit comparedto that of smear microscopy and the Xpert MTB/RIF assay.
Out of 317 cases, the rate of TB-positivesamples evaluated by different methods was 33.
4% (106/317; 95% CI 28.
2-38.
6) for smear microscopy,37.
9% (120/317; 95% CI 32.
5-43.
2) for the Xpert MTB/RIF, and 40.
7% (129/317; 95% CI 35.
3-46.
1) forthe PaxView TB/NTM MPCR-ULFA Kit.
Compared to the Xpert MTB/RIF as a standard reference, thePaxView TB/NTM MPCR-ULFA Kit was found to possess a 92.
5% sensitivity (111/120; 95% CI 87.
8-97.
2), a 90.
8% specificity (179/197; 95% CI 86.
8-94.
8), 86.
0% PPV (111/129; 95% CI 80.
0-92.
0), anda NPV 95.
2% (179/188; 95% CI 92.
2-98.
3).
The PaxView TB/NTM MPCR-ULFA Kit could be a usefulmolecular diagnostic tool to identify MTB in clinical samples in resource-limited countries, as this procedureis more cost-effective and sensitive than the Xpert MTB/RIF, and more convenient than conventional PCRgel electrophoresis approaches.

Related Results

Comparison evaluation between gene Xpert Mtb/Rif and multiplex PCR for rapid diagnosis of mycobacterium tuberculosis
Comparison evaluation between gene Xpert Mtb/Rif and multiplex PCR for rapid diagnosis of mycobacterium tuberculosis
Abstract Objective: To evaluate Gene Xpert MTB/RIF and Multiplex PCRfor detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Rifampicin resistance comparing with gold standard MGIT 96...
Survival and infectivity of mycobacterium tuberculosis after aerosolization
Survival and infectivity of mycobacterium tuberculosis after aerosolization
<p dir="ltr">Tuberculosis (TB) remains the leading cause of death by a single infectious organism with over 1.3 million people succumbing to the disease every year. Despite e...
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Abstract Introduction Hospitals are high-risk environments for infections. Despite the global recognition of these pathogens, few studies compare microorganisms from community-acqu...

Back to Top