Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Comparative Risk Assessment
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Comparative risk assessment is an analytic process of evaluating and ranking the different factors that contribute to a particular outcome, such as human disease. The term
comparative risk assessment
is most frequently used in the context of environmental risk, but the principles and methodology are applicable in other contexts.
Comparative risk assessment is both a scientific and political process. Scientific methods are used to gather data, classify the type and severity of risks, and identify and verify relationships between outcomes and risk factors. As it is a guide to decision making, comparative risk assessment also involves the political functions of defining the scope of the assessment, involving stakeholders in the process, and putting the results into a context that can be used to develop consensus concerning appropriate action.
This article reviews the history of comparative risk assessment for environmental risk, discusses methods of risk ranking used in environmental risk, reviews methods of communicating risk, considers a few examples of comparative risk assessment in nonenvironmental areas, and touches on United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and other regulations as they relate to comparative risk assessment.
Title: Comparative Risk Assessment
Description:
Abstract
Comparative risk assessment is an analytic process of evaluating and ranking the different factors that contribute to a particular outcome, such as human disease.
The term
comparative risk assessment
is most frequently used in the context of environmental risk, but the principles and methodology are applicable in other contexts.
Comparative risk assessment is both a scientific and political process.
Scientific methods are used to gather data, classify the type and severity of risks, and identify and verify relationships between outcomes and risk factors.
As it is a guide to decision making, comparative risk assessment also involves the political functions of defining the scope of the assessment, involving stakeholders in the process, and putting the results into a context that can be used to develop consensus concerning appropriate action.
This article reviews the history of comparative risk assessment for environmental risk, discusses methods of risk ranking used in environmental risk, reviews methods of communicating risk, considers a few examples of comparative risk assessment in nonenvironmental areas, and touches on United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and other regulations as they relate to comparative risk assessment.
Related Results
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
In a comprehensive and at times critical manner, this volume seeks to shed light on the development of events in Western (i.e., European and North American) comparative literature ...
Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Abstract
Introduction
Although the efficacy of PD-L1 blockade has been evaluated in analyses that combine pharmacologically distinct antibodies, the specific efficacy and safety of...
Asesmen Formatif Pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini Di Indonesia
Asesmen Formatif Pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini Di Indonesia
Formative assessment in early childhood education in Indonesia does not have been working well. The research aims to prove the problem that the formative assessment (assessment for...
Accountability of Assessment Administration
Accountability of Assessment Administration
Abstract
Changes in the education system will invariably alter the modes of assessment and practices moving forward. This will demand high expectations among stak...
Environmental Impact Assessment and Environmental Risk Assessment: Review of Concepts, Steps and Significance
Environmental Impact Assessment and Environmental Risk Assessment: Review of Concepts, Steps and Significance
Environmental Impact Assessment is an assessment of the possible positive or negative impact a proposed project will have on the environment, considering the natural, social and ec...
Abstract 13915: Comparison of Proteomic CV Risk to Established ASCVD 10-year Risk Decision Points
Abstract 13915: Comparison of Proteomic CV Risk to Established ASCVD 10-year Risk Decision Points
Introduction:
The ASCVD pooled cohort equation (PCE) is well-established for CV risk assessment. Decision points for determining treatment plans are low, intermediate a...
Abstract 3463: Beyond staging systems in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: Validation of two thresholds for a model-estimated metastatic risk
Abstract 3463: Beyond staging systems in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: Validation of two thresholds for a model-estimated metastatic risk
Abstract
Background: Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is the second most common skin cancer, therefore causing a death toll comparable to that of melanoma, d...
Environmental Risk Assessment/Environmental Hazard Assessment: Similarities and Differences
Environmental Risk Assessment/Environmental Hazard Assessment: Similarities and Differences
Risk assessment and hazard assessment are alternate paradigms for assessing the effects of chemicals and other hazards on the environment. Risk assessment is an old assessment trad...

