Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Comparative Risk Assessment
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Comparative risk assessment is an analytic process of evaluating and ranking the different factors that contribute to a particular outcome, such as human disease. The term
comparative risk assessment
is most frequently used in the context of environmental risk, but the principles and methodology are applicable in other contexts.
Comparative risk assessment is both a scientific and political process. Scientific methods are used to gather data, classify the type and severity of risks, and identify and verify relationships between outcomes and risk factors. As it is a guide to decision making, comparative risk assessment also involves the political functions of defining the scope of the assessment, involving stakeholders in the process, and putting the results into a context that can be used to develop consensus concerning appropriate action.
This article reviews the history of comparative risk assessment for environmental risk, discusses methods of risk ranking used in environmental risk, reviews methods of communicating risk, considers a few examples of comparative risk assessment in nonenvironmental areas, and touches on United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and other regulations as they relate to comparative risk assessment.
Title: Comparative Risk Assessment
Description:
Abstract
Comparative risk assessment is an analytic process of evaluating and ranking the different factors that contribute to a particular outcome, such as human disease.
The term
comparative risk assessment
is most frequently used in the context of environmental risk, but the principles and methodology are applicable in other contexts.
Comparative risk assessment is both a scientific and political process.
Scientific methods are used to gather data, classify the type and severity of risks, and identify and verify relationships between outcomes and risk factors.
As it is a guide to decision making, comparative risk assessment also involves the political functions of defining the scope of the assessment, involving stakeholders in the process, and putting the results into a context that can be used to develop consensus concerning appropriate action.
This article reviews the history of comparative risk assessment for environmental risk, discusses methods of risk ranking used in environmental risk, reviews methods of communicating risk, considers a few examples of comparative risk assessment in nonenvironmental areas, and touches on United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and other regulations as they relate to comparative risk assessment.
Related Results
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
In a comprehensive and at times critical manner, this volume seeks to shed light on the development of events in Western (i.e., European and North American) comparative literature ...
Abstract 13915: Comparison of Proteomic CV Risk to Established ASCVD 10-year Risk Decision Points
Abstract 13915: Comparison of Proteomic CV Risk to Established ASCVD 10-year Risk Decision Points
Introduction:
The ASCVD pooled cohort equation (PCE) is well-established for CV risk assessment. Decision points for determining treatment plans are low, intermediate a...
Environmental Risk Assessment/Environmental Hazard Assessment: Similarities and Differences
Environmental Risk Assessment/Environmental Hazard Assessment: Similarities and Differences
Risk assessment and hazard assessment are alternate paradigms for assessing the effects of chemicals and other hazards on the environment. Risk assessment is an old assessment trad...
Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Used as an Enabler for Dynamic Risk Management
Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Used as an Enabler for Dynamic Risk Management
Abstract
Applying big data, data science, business process automation (BPA) and domain expertise to operational and project risk in the upstream O&G space, will ...
146 IS SURTAVI RISK MODEL A STEP TOWARDS ‘TAVI RISK SCORE’: TIME TO RETHINK?
146 IS SURTAVI RISK MODEL A STEP TOWARDS ‘TAVI RISK SCORE’: TIME TO RETHINK?
Introduction
During the design of the SURTAVI trial, a new concept of risk stratification for patients with aortic stenosis, based upon age combined with a fixed ...
FRAMB: A man-machine cooperation risk assessment method for intelligent network information systems
FRAMB: A man-machine cooperation risk assessment method for intelligent network information systems
The intelligent network information systems, such as smart grid systems, face many security problems in the aspects of sensing, communication and computing. Information security ri...
Risk-Directed Ambulatory Thromboprophylaxis in Lung and Gastrointestinal Cancers
Risk-Directed Ambulatory Thromboprophylaxis in Lung and Gastrointestinal Cancers
ImportanceThromboprophylaxis for individuals receiving systemic anticancer therapies has proven to be effective. Potential to maximize benefits relies on improved risk-directed str...
Teachers’ Perceptions Regarding Multiple Assessment Paradigms in English Teaching and Its’ Influence on Learning Achievement of Secondary Class Students
Teachers’ Perceptions Regarding Multiple Assessment Paradigms in English Teaching and Its’ Influence on Learning Achievement of Secondary Class Students
Teachers’ assessment practices are pre-dominated by their perceptions, beliefs and attitudes. Review of literature on assessment indicates five assessment paradigms in relation to ...

