Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Francesco Patrizi da Cherso's Criticism of Aristotle's Logic Francesco Patrizi da Cherso's Criticism of Aristotle's Logic
View through CrossRef
AbstractFrancesco Patrizi da Cherso's Discussiones peripateticae (1581) are one of the most comprehensive analyses of the whole of Aristotelian philosophy to be published before Werner Jaeger's Aristoteles. The main thrust of the argument in the Discussiones is that whatever Aristotle had said that was true was not new, and that whatever he had said that was new was not true. The article shows how Patrizi proves this with respect to the Organon, and deals with the implications for the history af ancient philosophy in general implied by his stance.
Title: Francesco Patrizi da Cherso's Criticism of Aristotle's Logic Francesco Patrizi da Cherso's Criticism of Aristotle's Logic
Description:
AbstractFrancesco Patrizi da Cherso's Discussiones peripateticae (1581) are one of the most comprehensive analyses of the whole of Aristotelian philosophy to be published before Werner Jaeger's Aristoteles.
The main thrust of the argument in the Discussiones is that whatever Aristotle had said that was true was not new, and that whatever he had said that was new was not true.
The article shows how Patrizi proves this with respect to the Organon, and deals with the implications for the history af ancient philosophy in general implied by his stance.
Related Results
Ernest Barker and Greek Political Thought: Aristotle
Ernest Barker and Greek Political Thought: Aristotle
Ernest Barker is best remembered for his study of Plato and his Predecessors (1918), yet his early efforts to mine Greek political theory for relevant insights centred on Aristotle...
The Problem of the Partheniae in Aristotle’s Political Thought
The Problem of the Partheniae in Aristotle’s Political Thought
This article examines Aristotle’s discussion of the Spartan revolt of the Partheniae in Politics V.7. Aristotle appears to use the Partheniae as examples of two sources of instabil...
Epistemic extensions of substructural inquisitive logics
Epistemic extensions of substructural inquisitive logics
Abstract
In this paper, we study the epistemic extensions of distributive substructural inquisitive logics. Substructural inquisitive logics are logics of questions ...
Intuitionistic ancestral logic
Intuitionistic ancestral logic
Abstract
In this article we define pure intuitionistic Ancestral Logic ( iAL ), extending pure intuitionistic First-Order Logic ( iFOL ). This logic is a dependently...
A Logic for Desire Based on Causal Inference
A Logic for Desire Based on Causal Inference
Abstract
Reasoning about desire plays a significant role in logic, artificial intelligence and philosophy, etc. In this paper, we propose an interpretation of desire...
Aristotle on the Period (Rhet. 3. 9)
Aristotle on the Period (Rhet. 3. 9)
Aristotle (Rhet. 3.9) distinguishes two types of style, the ‘periodic’ or ‘rounded’ (λ⋯ξιςκατεστραμμέη) and the ‘non-periodic’, ‘strung-on’ or ‘continuous’ (λέξιςε;ἰρομένη).* The l...
From Aristotle to Cicero
From Aristotle to Cicero
This collection draws together a selection of Gisela Striker’ essays on ancient philosophy published over a period of forty years. There is first a series of papers on Aristotle’s ...
Aristotle and the People: Vernacular Philosophy in Renaissance Italy
Aristotle and the People: Vernacular Philosophy in Renaissance Italy
The essay focuses on vernacular Aristotelianism in Renaissance Italy, which began to gain currency in the 1540s, just as the vernacular was beginning to establish itself as a langu...