Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The rulings of political discourse, the treatment of political issues,

View through CrossRef
This study examined the rulings of political discourse, the treatment of political issues, and their models. In the present era, discourse holds immense significance; its absence constitutes a primary cause of numerous problems. Many countries in the islamic and arab worlds (or nations) face myriad challenges-including terrorism, civil wars, chaos, and political decay-resulting from a lack of political understanding between the ruler and the subjects, and between supporters and opponents. This is direct consequence of political discourse rulings being missing, restricted, or deviant leading to political fragmentation and the loss of unity and strength. The research problem briefly lies in the apparent contradictions within political discourse, the lack of credibility, the absence of governing rules, the violation of evidence, and the prevalence of hearsay. The research objectives are to clarify the application of political discourse rulings, the conceps of criticism and opposition, and the methodology for addressing political issues. The methodology employed is sequential approach to the rulings and treatment of political discourse, relying on authoritative sources. Information is presented in a manner that provides the reader with deduced rulings and discovered significances, while highlighting certain disputes and contractions within the materials of sharia compliant politics (siyasa shar’yya). Key research finding: Political discourse is not new phenomenon; instead, its applications are renewed in every era to harmonize with the specific requirements of the time.Political discourse requires frameworks that evolve alongside the development of communication methods and tools. The study highlights the risks associated with discourse that deviates from established principles and the resulting social and political harm. Since political discourse rulings change and adapt due to their role in persuasion and effecting change, there is a need for frameworks that are both realistic and grounded in legal principles. Keyword:rulings, discourse, politics
Title: The rulings of political discourse, the treatment of political issues,
Description:
This study examined the rulings of political discourse, the treatment of political issues, and their models.
In the present era, discourse holds immense significance; its absence constitutes a primary cause of numerous problems.
Many countries in the islamic and arab worlds (or nations) face myriad challenges-including terrorism, civil wars, chaos, and political decay-resulting from a lack of political understanding between the ruler and the subjects, and between supporters and opponents.
This is direct consequence of political discourse rulings being missing, restricted, or deviant leading to political fragmentation and the loss of unity and strength.
The research problem briefly lies in the apparent contradictions within political discourse, the lack of credibility, the absence of governing rules, the violation of evidence, and the prevalence of hearsay.
The research objectives are to clarify the application of political discourse rulings, the conceps of criticism and opposition, and the methodology for addressing political issues.
The methodology employed is sequential approach to the rulings and treatment of political discourse, relying on authoritative sources.
Information is presented in a manner that provides the reader with deduced rulings and discovered significances, while highlighting certain disputes and contractions within the materials of sharia compliant politics (siyasa shar’yya).
Key research finding: Political discourse is not new phenomenon; instead, its applications are renewed in every era to harmonize with the specific requirements of the time.
Political discourse requires frameworks that evolve alongside the development of communication methods and tools.
The study highlights the risks associated with discourse that deviates from established principles and the resulting social and political harm.
Since political discourse rulings change and adapt due to their role in persuasion and effecting change, there is a need for frameworks that are both realistic and grounded in legal principles.
Keyword:rulings, discourse, politics.

Related Results

Avoiding Scandals Through Tax Rulings Transparency
Avoiding Scandals Through Tax Rulings Transparency
In 2014, the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists broke the “LuxLeaks” scandal, revealing numerous tax rulings that the press termed “sweetheart deals” granted to ...
Exploring Muslim consumers' information sources for fatwa rulings on products and behaviors
Exploring Muslim consumers' information sources for fatwa rulings on products and behaviors
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to explore the nature of fatwa and the dissemination of fatwa rulings among Muslim consumers using two studies. Results from these studies show ...
Pitching Outside the DSU: Preliminary Rulings in WTO Dispute Settlement
Pitching Outside the DSU: Preliminary Rulings in WTO Dispute Settlement
It has become the norm for WTO panels to issue rulings on preliminary issues such as jurisdiction, terms of reference and other related issues pertaining to a dispute upon the requ...
Discourse Coherence in Chinese
Discourse Coherence in Chinese
Discourse coherence is motivated by the need of the speaker to be understood, which is a psychological phenomenon reflected in the organization of natural discourse. It can be real...
Kritička analiza diskursa o fleksibilizaciji tržišta rada
Kritička analiza diskursa o fleksibilizaciji tržišta rada
The research is focused on the study of public discourse on labor market flexibilization in Croatia during the reform of the Croatian Labor Act which was undertaken by the Croatian...
APPEAL OF JUDICIAL RULINGS
APPEAL OF JUDICIAL RULINGS
The principle regarding judicial rulings issued by judges is that they must be respected and fully complied with, whether by both parties to the dispute: the plaintiff and the defe...
Atypical Rulings of the Indonesian Constitutional Court
Atypical Rulings of the Indonesian Constitutional Court
In deciding judicial review cases, the Court may issue rulings that is not in accordance to what is stipulated in the Constitutional Court Law (Law Number 8 Year 2011). Atypical ru...
Konsep Putusan Hakim pada Pengadilan Agama di Indonesia
Konsep Putusan Hakim pada Pengadilan Agama di Indonesia
A ruling is a decision delivered by a judge in a trial, aimed at resolving a dispute or legal matter between the parties involved. There are various types of rulings, such as Decla...

Back to Top