Javascript must be enabled to continue!
<b>The Effectiveness of Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization (IASTM) and Myofascial Release (MFR) in Reducing Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness (DOMS) in the Cervicothoracic Region</b>
View through CrossRef
Background: Delayed-onset muscle soreness of the cervicothoracic region may cause pain, stiffness, functional limitation, and reduced cervical range of motion after unfamiliar or strenuous upper-body activity. Instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization and myofascial release are commonly used manual therapy techniques, but their comparative short-term effects in cervicothoracic DOMS remain insufficiently defined. Objective: To compare the effects of IASTM and MFR on pain intensity, neck-related disability, and cervical range of motion in adults with cervicothoracic DOMS. Methods: This assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial included 58 participants aged 25–35 years with clinically confirmed cervicothoracic DOMS of 24–72 hours’ duration. Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Green International University under approval number NCT07609498. Participants were randomized equally to IASTM (n = 29) or MFR (n = 29). Each group received three treatment sessions. Pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale, disability using the Neck Disability Index, and cervical ROM using goniometry. Outcomes were measured at baseline and after each session. Data were analyzed using between-group comparisons and 2 × 4 mixed-design repeated-measures ANOVA. Results: Baseline characteristics and outcome scores were comparable between groups. Both interventions produced significant improvements over time; however, IASTM showed greater final improvement than MFR in VAS (1.45 ± 0.31 vs 2.72 ± 0.35), NDI (6.10 ± 1.02 vs 9.78 ± 1.41), flexion (53.65 ± 1.71° vs 49.02 ± 2.20°), extension (59.43 ± 2.44° vs 54.42 ± 2.18°), and bilateral lateral flexion and rotation. Time × group interactions were significant for all outcomes. Conclusion: Both IASTM and MFR improved cervicothoracic DOMS over three sessions, but IASTM produced greater short-term reductions in pain and disability and larger improvements in cervical ROM.
Link Medical Institute
Title: <b>The Effectiveness of Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization (IASTM) and Myofascial Release (MFR) in Reducing Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness (DOMS) in the Cervicothoracic Region</b>
Description:
Background: Delayed-onset muscle soreness of the cervicothoracic region may cause pain, stiffness, functional limitation, and reduced cervical range of motion after unfamiliar or strenuous upper-body activity.
Instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization and myofascial release are commonly used manual therapy techniques, but their comparative short-term effects in cervicothoracic DOMS remain insufficiently defined.
Objective: To compare the effects of IASTM and MFR on pain intensity, neck-related disability, and cervical range of motion in adults with cervicothoracic DOMS.
Methods: This assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial included 58 participants aged 25–35 years with clinically confirmed cervicothoracic DOMS of 24–72 hours’ duration.
Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Green International University under approval number NCT07609498.
Participants were randomized equally to IASTM (n = 29) or MFR (n = 29).
Each group received three treatment sessions.
Pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale, disability using the Neck Disability Index, and cervical ROM using goniometry.
Outcomes were measured at baseline and after each session.
Data were analyzed using between-group comparisons and 2 × 4 mixed-design repeated-measures ANOVA.
Results: Baseline characteristics and outcome scores were comparable between groups.
Both interventions produced significant improvements over time; however, IASTM showed greater final improvement than MFR in VAS (1.
45 ± 0.
31 vs 2.
72 ± 0.
35), NDI (6.
10 ± 1.
02 vs 9.
78 ± 1.
41), flexion (53.
65 ± 1.
71° vs 49.
02 ± 2.
20°), extension (59.
43 ± 2.
44° vs 54.
42 ± 2.
18°), and bilateral lateral flexion and rotation.
Time × group interactions were significant for all outcomes.
Conclusion: Both IASTM and MFR improved cervicothoracic DOMS over three sessions, but IASTM produced greater short-term reductions in pain and disability and larger improvements in cervical ROM.
Related Results
Pengaruh Myofacial Release Kombinasi dengan Hold Relax terhadap Myofacial Pain Syndrome
Pengaruh Myofacial Release Kombinasi dengan Hold Relax terhadap Myofacial Pain Syndrome
AbstrakPekerja garment khususnya pada bagian operator jahit merupakan salah satu pekerjaan yang beresiko terkena gangguan myofascial pain syndrome otot upper trapezius. Myofascial ...
Effect of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization versus myofascial release therapy for pain, mobility, and disability in chronic low backache patients: a quasi-experimental study
Effect of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization versus myofascial release therapy for pain, mobility, and disability in chronic low backache patients: a quasi-experimental study
Background & objective: Low back pain (LBP) is a common musculoskeletal disorder in the general population. The most common etiological factors are overuse syndromes, postural ...
COMPARISON OF INSTRUMENT-ASSISTED SOFT TISSUE MOBILIZATION TECHNIQUE AND MYOFASCIAL GUN IN UPPER CROSS SYNDROME
COMPARISON OF INSTRUMENT-ASSISTED SOFT TISSUE MOBILIZATION TECHNIQUE AND MYOFASCIAL GUN IN UPPER CROSS SYNDROME
Background: Upper Cross Syndrome (UCS) is acquired due to use of cell phones, laptops etc. Upper Trapezius is one of the primary muscles that is tightened in UCS. Myofascial releas...
Three-dimensional Myofascial Release for Musculoskeletal Conditions: An Educational Perspective
Three-dimensional Myofascial Release for Musculoskeletal Conditions: An Educational Perspective
Myofascial Release (MFR) is a therapy treatment that aims to relieve pain by releasing fascial restrictions and regaining normal movement patterns. Three-Dimensional Myofascial Rel...
Mechanism and Theories for Delayed Onset of Muscle Soreness in Athletes
Mechanism and Theories for Delayed Onset of Muscle Soreness in Athletes
The sensation of tenderness and tightness over the muscle, post eccentric exercise is called Delayed Onset of Muscle Soreness (DOMS). It is not an acute pain. Post exercise the sor...
Effects of Instrumented Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization (IASTM) Technique Versus Stretching on Ililotibal Band in Patients with Anterior Knee Pain
Effects of Instrumented Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization (IASTM) Technique Versus Stretching on Ililotibal Band in Patients with Anterior Knee Pain
Background: Anterior knee pain is caused by many factors iliotibial band tightness is one of cause of knee pain. The repeated hip abduction or postural imbalance usually results in...
Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness (DOMS): Management Update
Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness (DOMS): Management Update
Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness (DOMS) is a prevalent issue in sports medicine and among physically active individuals, causing significant pain and disability. While the exact patho...
COMPARATIVE EFFECTS OF INSTRUMENT ASSISTED SOFT TISSUE MOBILIZATION AND THERAPEUTIC CUPPING ON HAMSTRING TIGHTNESS AMONG FOOTBALL PLAYERS
COMPARATIVE EFFECTS OF INSTRUMENT ASSISTED SOFT TISSUE MOBILIZATION AND THERAPEUTIC CUPPING ON HAMSTRING TIGHTNESS AMONG FOOTBALL PLAYERS
Background: Injuries and decreased performance are two consequences of hamstring tightness, which is common among football players. There is a lack of data on the relative efficacy...

