Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Prosecuting Transnational Disinformation
View through CrossRef
<p>Disinformation, along with related terms such as fake news and misinformation, has dominated U.S. media and public discourse over the past decade. It has emerged as a persistent and growing global threat to democratic societies, particularly the United States. Since the 2016 elections, authoritarian regimes and U.S. adversaries, including China, Russia, and Iran, have increasingly leveraged disinformation as a strategic tool to damage public trust in institutions, undermine political processes such as elections, and weaken public confidence in the healthcare system. These efforts are also designed to sow division and erode democratic governance. The breakthroughs in generative AI further exacerbate this problem, making it significantly easier to produce and disseminate sophisticated, realistic, and large-scale disinformation at an unprecedented speed and low cost. Despite the severity of this challenge, disinformation remains an understudied field, particularly within legal scholarship. Existing literature largely overlooks its transboundary and global dimensions, as well as the necessity for cross-border countermeasures.</p><br><p>This article introduces and conceptualizes “transnational disinformation,” arguing for its legal recognition and prosecution. While all forms of disinformation are harmful, transnational disinformation poses the most severe threat to American democracy, as it is deliberately orchestrated by foreign adversaries, proxy actors, and transnational criminal networks to pollute and manipulate the information ecosystem. This article proposes a legal framework that enables the prosecution of transnational disinformation while safeguarding First Amendment protections. Furthermore, it demonstrates how the U.S.’s extensive history in combating transnational crimes provides a strong foundation for effectively prosecuting transnational disinformation and maintaining global leadership in countering this growing threat.</p>
Title: Prosecuting Transnational Disinformation
Description:
<p>Disinformation, along with related terms such as fake news and misinformation, has dominated U.
S.
media and public discourse over the past decade.
It has emerged as a persistent and growing global threat to democratic societies, particularly the United States.
Since the 2016 elections, authoritarian regimes and U.
S.
adversaries, including China, Russia, and Iran, have increasingly leveraged disinformation as a strategic tool to damage public trust in institutions, undermine political processes such as elections, and weaken public confidence in the healthcare system.
These efforts are also designed to sow division and erode democratic governance.
The breakthroughs in generative AI further exacerbate this problem, making it significantly easier to produce and disseminate sophisticated, realistic, and large-scale disinformation at an unprecedented speed and low cost.
Despite the severity of this challenge, disinformation remains an understudied field, particularly within legal scholarship.
Existing literature largely overlooks its transboundary and global dimensions, as well as the necessity for cross-border countermeasures.
</p><br><p>This article introduces and conceptualizes “transnational disinformation,” arguing for its legal recognition and prosecution.
While all forms of disinformation are harmful, transnational disinformation poses the most severe threat to American democracy, as it is deliberately orchestrated by foreign adversaries, proxy actors, and transnational criminal networks to pollute and manipulate the information ecosystem.
This article proposes a legal framework that enables the prosecution of transnational disinformation while safeguarding First Amendment protections.
Furthermore, it demonstrates how the U.
S.
’s extensive history in combating transnational crimes provides a strong foundation for effectively prosecuting transnational disinformation and maintaining global leadership in countering this growing threat.
</p>.
Related Results
Transnational Feminism
Transnational Feminism
Transnational feminism developed out of postcolonial and women of color feminisms, both of which critiqued the idea that “sisterhood is global” (see Robin Morgan, Sisterhood is Glo...
What Is Disinformation?
What Is Disinformation?
Prototypical instances of disinformation include deceptive advertising (in business and in politics), government propaganda, doctored photographs, forged documents, fake maps, inte...
Emotional prompting amplifies disinformation generation in AI large language models
Emotional prompting amplifies disinformation generation in AI large language models
Introduction
The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) large language models (LLMs), which can produce text that closely resembles human-written content, pr...
Confronting Disinformation: Journalists and the Conflict over Truth in #Elxn43
Confronting Disinformation: Journalists and the Conflict over Truth in #Elxn43
(Note: This is a pre-print, not copy-edited, of a chapter for publication in: Cyber-Threats to Canadian Democracy, ed. by Holly Ann Garnett and Michael Pal. McGill-Queen’s Universi...
Misinformation, Disinformation, and
Political Liberalism
Misinformation, Disinformation, and
Political Liberalism
Abstract
Rawls’s Political Liberalism (PL) defends a political conception of justice that can serve as a just, stable, and legitimate basis for political cooperat...
Analyzing Mis/Disinformation: Understanding Swiss COVID-19 Narratives Through NLP Analysis
Analyzing Mis/Disinformation: Understanding Swiss COVID-19 Narratives Through NLP Analysis
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the challenges posed by the rapid spread of mis/disinformation, exacerbating societal polarization and institutional distrust. Und...
FENOMENA DISINFORMSASI VAKSINASI COVID-19 PADA REMAJA DI KABUPATEN JOMBANG
FENOMENA DISINFORMSASI VAKSINASI COVID-19 PADA REMAJA DI KABUPATEN JOMBANG
This study looks at how disinformation regarding Covid-19 affects the process of making vaccination decisions for adolescents aged 12 to 17 years in Jombang Regency. The increase i...
Facts and their Discontents: A Research Agenda for Online Disinformation, Race, and Gender
Facts and their Discontents: A Research Agenda for Online Disinformation, Race, and Gender
The January 6th attack on the U.S. Capitol demonstrated how online disinformation can have severe offline consequences. For some time, the problems and possible impacts on democrac...

