Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The New Hume
View through CrossRef
The “New Humeans” attribute to Hume what they call a “skeptical realist” view. A skeptical realist about some entity is realist about the entity’s existence, but agnostic about the nature or character of that thing because it is epistemically inaccessible. Hume, in the Treatise and throughout his philosophical writings, shows how the illusion that one is referring to something can naturally arise even when there is no such thing to refer to. When Cleanthes asks Demea if “the name (‘God’), without any meaning, is of such mighty importance,” the new skeptical realist can only reply, “Maybe yes, maybe no, but we will never be in a position to decide which.” Such conceptual agnosticism, something a fideist might welcome, would be dismissed by Hume.
Title: The New Hume
Description:
The “New Humeans” attribute to Hume what they call a “skeptical realist” view.
A skeptical realist about some entity is realist about the entity’s existence, but agnostic about the nature or character of that thing because it is epistemically inaccessible.
Hume, in the Treatise and throughout his philosophical writings, shows how the illusion that one is referring to something can naturally arise even when there is no such thing to refer to.
When Cleanthes asks Demea if “the name (‘God’), without any meaning, is of such mighty importance,” the new skeptical realist can only reply, “Maybe yes, maybe no, but we will never be in a position to decide which.
” Such conceptual agnosticism, something a fideist might welcome, would be dismissed by Hume.
Related Results
The Oxford Handbook of Hume
The Oxford Handbook of Hume
David Hume (1711–1776) is widely regarded as the greatest and most influential of the English-speaking philosophers. The range of his contributions is considerable: covering issues...
Hume and the Contemporary “Common Sense” Critique of Hume
Hume and the Contemporary “Common Sense” Critique of Hume
This paper examines the principal objections that Hume’s Scots contemporaries, George Campbell, James Beattie, and Thomas Reid raised against his views of testimony, belief, and th...
Playing with Fire
Playing with Fire
Hume is not a rationalist. This paper attempts to explain why by examining Hume’s argument in Treatise 1.3.3 from his separability principle to the denial of that hallmark of ratio...
The Passions as Original Existences
The Passions as Original Existences
Hume’s thesis that reason and passion cannot be opposed depends in part on his defense of the claim that because passions do not represent, they cannot oppose the representations, ...
Hume and Smith on Moral Philosophy
Hume and Smith on Moral Philosophy
Scholars of eighteenth-century Scottish philosophy today tend to agree that Adam Smith, while deeply indebted to Hume, was also engaged in a comprehensive and creative transformati...
David Hume
David Hume
In this chapter the author presents Hume’s “skeptical” argument for the conclusion that there is no rational link between our observational and memorial/observational knowledge of ...
Hey, What’s the Big Idea?
Hey, What’s the Big Idea?
Berkeley and Hume share a commitment to the existence of extended ideas or perceptions. This essay first examines how Berkeley and Hume differ from such predecessors as Descartes a...