Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Fish Habitat: Essential Fish Habitat and Rehabilitation
View through CrossRef
<em>Abstract.</em> —Seabed disturbance by mobile bottom-fishing gear has emerged as a major concern related to the conservation of essential fish habitat. Unquestionably, dredges and trawls disturb the seabed. However, the seabed is also disturbed by natural physical and biological processes. The biological communities that utilize a particular habitat have adapted to that environment through natural selection, and, therefore, the impact of mobile fishing gear on the habitat structure and biological community must be scaled against the magnitude and frequency of seabed disturbance due to natural causes. Fishers operating in the mouth of Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island use trawls to harvest lobsters, squid, and finfish and dredges to harvest mussels. These mobile fishing gears impact rock, sand, and mud substrates. Side-scan sonar data from 1995 with 200% coverage were available from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration for the mouth of Narragansett Bay. Analysis of these data indicates that evidence of bottom scarring by the fishing gear is restricted to deeper waters with a seabed composition of soft cohesive sediments, despite the observation that fishing activity is ubiquitous throughout the bay mouth. A quantitative model has been developed to compare the magnitude and frequency of natural seabed disturbance to mobile fishing gear disturbance. Wave and tidal currents at the seabed are coupled with sediment characteristics to estimate the degree of seabed disturbance. Field experiments designed to compare the longevity of bottom scars indicate that scars in shoal waters and sand sediments are short-lived, as compared to scars in deep water and mud sediments, which are long-lasting. Finally, the model results are compared to the recovery time of sediments disturbed by the interaction of the fishing gear with the seabed. The impact of mobile fishing gear on the seabed must be evaluated in light of the degree of seabed disturbance due to natural phenomena. The application of this model on a larger scale to continental shelf waters and seabed sediment environments will allow for the identification of problematic areas relative to the degradation of essential fish habitat by mobile fishing gear.
Title: Fish Habitat: Essential Fish Habitat and Rehabilitation
Description:
<em>Abstract.
</em> —Seabed disturbance by mobile bottom-fishing gear has emerged as a major concern related to the conservation of essential fish habitat.
Unquestionably, dredges and trawls disturb the seabed.
However, the seabed is also disturbed by natural physical and biological processes.
The biological communities that utilize a particular habitat have adapted to that environment through natural selection, and, therefore, the impact of mobile fishing gear on the habitat structure and biological community must be scaled against the magnitude and frequency of seabed disturbance due to natural causes.
Fishers operating in the mouth of Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island use trawls to harvest lobsters, squid, and finfish and dredges to harvest mussels.
These mobile fishing gears impact rock, sand, and mud substrates.
Side-scan sonar data from 1995 with 200% coverage were available from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration for the mouth of Narragansett Bay.
Analysis of these data indicates that evidence of bottom scarring by the fishing gear is restricted to deeper waters with a seabed composition of soft cohesive sediments, despite the observation that fishing activity is ubiquitous throughout the bay mouth.
A quantitative model has been developed to compare the magnitude and frequency of natural seabed disturbance to mobile fishing gear disturbance.
Wave and tidal currents at the seabed are coupled with sediment characteristics to estimate the degree of seabed disturbance.
Field experiments designed to compare the longevity of bottom scars indicate that scars in shoal waters and sand sediments are short-lived, as compared to scars in deep water and mud sediments, which are long-lasting.
Finally, the model results are compared to the recovery time of sediments disturbed by the interaction of the fishing gear with the seabed.
The impact of mobile fishing gear on the seabed must be evaluated in light of the degree of seabed disturbance due to natural phenomena.
The application of this model on a larger scale to continental shelf waters and seabed sediment environments will allow for the identification of problematic areas relative to the degradation of essential fish habitat by mobile fishing gear.
Related Results
Social Economic Determinants of Adoption of Fish Farming in Gem Sub-County, Siaya County, Kenya
Social Economic Determinants of Adoption of Fish Farming in Gem Sub-County, Siaya County, Kenya
The demand for fish in Kenya has been steadily increasing, prompting the exploration of alternative methods such as fish farming to address this rising demand. However, the adoptio...
Rehabilitation, Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine and Community Based Rehabilitation - a comment to the debate towards a differentiated view of PRM on rehabilitation system, services and training of rehabilitation professionals
Rehabilitation, Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine and Community Based Rehabilitation - a comment to the debate towards a differentiated view of PRM on rehabilitation system, services and training of rehabilitation professionals
This comment aims to give a contribution to the debate about the best way to implement rehabilitationservices and, in particular, how specialist in Physical and Rehabilitation Medi...
Fish Habitat: Essential Fish Habitat and Rehabilitation
Fish Habitat: Essential Fish Habitat and Rehabilitation
<em>Abstract.—</em> It cannot be denied that habitat is essential to healthy fish populations. A significant number of fish species in the Gulf of Mexico and around the...
Fish Habitat: Essential Fish Habitat and Rehabilitation
Fish Habitat: Essential Fish Habitat and Rehabilitation
<em>Abstract</em> .—Defining and quantifying essential fish habitat is difficult, perhaps particularly so in estuaries, which are typically dynamic. Yet we need habitat...
Fish Habitat: Essential Fish Habitat and Rehabilitation
Fish Habitat: Essential Fish Habitat and Rehabilitation
<em>Abstract.</em> —With the passage of the Sustainable Fisheries Act in the fall of 1996, significant new opportunities and challenges exist in the United States to pr...
PROBLEMATIC ISSUES OF FINANCIAL AND LEGAL SUPPORT FOR INTERNATIONAL AND STATE PROGRAMMES FOR THE REHABILITATION OF VETERANS
PROBLEMATIC ISSUES OF FINANCIAL AND LEGAL SUPPORT FOR INTERNATIONAL AND STATE PROGRAMMES FOR THE REHABILITATION OF VETERANS
This article provides a thorough analysis of the current financial and legal support available for veteran rehabilitation programmes in Ukraine. It highlights the importance of reh...
Transformation of Dnepr (Zaporizhia) reservoir`s fish fauna: retrospective review and current status
Transformation of Dnepr (Zaporizhia) reservoir`s fish fauna: retrospective review and current status
Creation of reservoirs by regulation of the Dnieper River and small rivers caused significant changes in the conditions of existence and affected on fish biodiversity of pondsof P...
Fish Habitat: Essential Fish Habitat and Rehabilitation
Fish Habitat: Essential Fish Habitat and Rehabilitation
<em>Abstract.</em> —The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act) of 1996 requires the identification of essential fish habitat (E...

