Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Investing in Systematic Factor Premiums

View through CrossRef
Investments in certain segments of the market realize better returns over longer periods than those in other segments. Leading academic studies from the eighties onwards demonstrate, for instance, that value, momentum, smallcap and low-volatility stocks systematically generate higher risk-adjusted returns. Investments in these segments or factors are also known as anomalies, as these factors cannot be explained by classic investment theories. However, allocation by institutional investors to strategies that explicitly capitalize on the benefits of these factors is now supported by academic research. This report takes as its starting point the study by researchers Ang, Goetzmann and Schaefer (2009) for the Norwegian Government Pension Fund, the first such study to explicitly recommend factor investing. This pension fund is one of the largest active investors in the world. When in 2008 ten years' worth of cumulative outperformance was wiped out, the fund launched an investigation to evaluate the effects of active management. The researchers concluded that the exposure to factor premiums clearly accounted for the fund's results. Their conclusion is clear: factor investing must be part of the strategic asset allocation of institutional investors. However, this begs further questions: •what is the added value of factor investing? •what are these underlying factors? •how can a pension fund best put together a portfolio? This report provides answers to these questions. As a follow-up to the study by Ang, Goetzmann and Schaefer, it is very topical, as many institutional investors are investigating the opportunities provided by factor investing. In addition to covering the theoretical aspects of factor investing, this study facilitates discussion between directors and regulators on optimum investment horizons. Institutional investors are particularly worried that recent financial developments will force them to operate increasingly over a shorter horizon. However, the strength of an institutional investor lies precisely in earning risk premiums over the long term, without losing sight of short-term risk premiums. At the moment, we are completing a second study that focuses specifically on the practical side of factor investing. It delves deeper into the discussion points that arise when using factor investing. Finally, a point about our relationship with Robeco. Robeco values factor investing highly and is also doing extensive research on this matter, but wanted an external, independently academic view to support its investigations. Hence we were given the task of writing this report.
Title: Investing in Systematic Factor Premiums
Description:
Investments in certain segments of the market realize better returns over longer periods than those in other segments.
Leading academic studies from the eighties onwards demonstrate, for instance, that value, momentum, smallcap and low-volatility stocks systematically generate higher risk-adjusted returns.
Investments in these segments or factors are also known as anomalies, as these factors cannot be explained by classic investment theories.
However, allocation by institutional investors to strategies that explicitly capitalize on the benefits of these factors is now supported by academic research.
This report takes as its starting point the study by researchers Ang, Goetzmann and Schaefer (2009) for the Norwegian Government Pension Fund, the first such study to explicitly recommend factor investing.
This pension fund is one of the largest active investors in the world.
When in 2008 ten years' worth of cumulative outperformance was wiped out, the fund launched an investigation to evaluate the effects of active management.
The researchers concluded that the exposure to factor premiums clearly accounted for the fund's results.
Their conclusion is clear: factor investing must be part of the strategic asset allocation of institutional investors.
However, this begs further questions: •what is the added value of factor investing? •what are these underlying factors? •how can a pension fund best put together a portfolio? This report provides answers to these questions.
As a follow-up to the study by Ang, Goetzmann and Schaefer, it is very topical, as many institutional investors are investigating the opportunities provided by factor investing.
In addition to covering the theoretical aspects of factor investing, this study facilitates discussion between directors and regulators on optimum investment horizons.
Institutional investors are particularly worried that recent financial developments will force them to operate increasingly over a shorter horizon.
However, the strength of an institutional investor lies precisely in earning risk premiums over the long term, without losing sight of short-term risk premiums.
At the moment, we are completing a second study that focuses specifically on the practical side of factor investing.
It delves deeper into the discussion points that arise when using factor investing.
Finally, a point about our relationship with Robeco.
Robeco values factor investing highly and is also doing extensive research on this matter, but wanted an external, independently academic view to support its investigations.
Hence we were given the task of writing this report.

Related Results

ANALISIS PERTIMBANGAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG DALAM MENGABULKAN KASASI TERDAKWA (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 2959/K/PID.SUS/2022)
ANALISIS PERTIMBANGAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG DALAM MENGABULKAN KASASI TERDAKWA (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 2959/K/PID.SUS/2022)
<p><em><span class="markedContent"><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*195.53px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*496.87px); font-size: calc(var(--scale-...
KEDUDUKAN AHLI BAHASA DALAM PEMBUKTIAN PERKARA PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR: 47/PID.SUS/2019/PN. MGT)
KEDUDUKAN AHLI BAHASA DALAM PEMBUKTIAN PERKARA PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR: 47/PID.SUS/2019/PN. MGT)
<em><span id="page3R_mcid52" class="markedContent"><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*125.30px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*539.11px); font-size: calc(va...
SECTORAL MARKET RISK PREMIUMS IN TURKEY
SECTORAL MARKET RISK PREMIUMS IN TURKEY
Purpose- This empirical study aims to measure the sectoral market risk premiums in the Turkish stock market for the period of 2016 and 2021 and also estimate the sectoral market ri...
Assessing energy rating premiums in the performance of green office buildings in Australia
Assessing energy rating premiums in the performance of green office buildings in Australia
Purpose– Green office buildings have recently taken on increased significance in institutional property portfolios in Australia and globally. The key issue from an institutional in...
Faith-Based Investing, Stewardship, and Sustainability: A Comparative Analysis
Faith-Based Investing, Stewardship, and Sustainability: A Comparative Analysis
Faith-Based Investing, Stewardship, and Sustainability: A Comparative Analysis This article discusses how faith-based investing addresses sustainability, focusing...
Skew Premiums around Earnings Announcements
Skew Premiums around Earnings Announcements
We examine skew premiums in equity options around earnings announcements. We use the realized returns to delta-neutral risk reversal option spreads as a proxy for the skew premiums...
Stock Market Liberalization and Emerging Market Country Fund Premiums
Stock Market Liberalization and Emerging Market Country Fund Premiums
This paper provides an analysis of the response of prices, net asset values and premiums of U.S. traded emerging market country funds to listing of new funds in the U.S. and relaxa...
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
This review summarizes the evidence from six randomized controlled trials that judged the effectiveness of systematic review summaries on policymakers' decision making, or the most...

Back to Top