Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Scepticism about epistemic blame

View through CrossRef
AbstractI advocate scepticism about epistemic blame; the view that we have good reason to think there is no distinctively epistemic form of blame. Epistemologists often find it useful to draw a distinction between blameless and blameworthy norm violation. In recent years, this has led several writers to develop theories of ‘epistemic blame.’ I present two challenges against the very idea of epistemic blame. First, everything that is supposedly done by epistemic blame is done by epistemic evaluation, at least according to a prominent view about the social role of epistemic evaluation. Parsimony considerations count against introducing an idle mechanism that does the same work as an existing one. Second, no current theory of epistemic blame includes a plausible account of the force of epistemic blame or the practices that could express it. I conclude that we should give up the notion of epistemic blame.
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Title: Scepticism about epistemic blame
Description:
AbstractI advocate scepticism about epistemic blame; the view that we have good reason to think there is no distinctively epistemic form of blame.
Epistemologists often find it useful to draw a distinction between blameless and blameworthy norm violation.
In recent years, this has led several writers to develop theories of ‘epistemic blame.
’ I present two challenges against the very idea of epistemic blame.
First, everything that is supposedly done by epistemic blame is done by epistemic evaluation, at least according to a prominent view about the social role of epistemic evaluation.
Parsimony considerations count against introducing an idle mechanism that does the same work as an existing one.
Second, no current theory of epistemic blame includes a plausible account of the force of epistemic blame or the practices that could express it.
I conclude that we should give up the notion of epistemic blame.

Related Results

Epistemic Injustice
Epistemic Injustice
The concept of epistemic injustice refers to the injustice that an individual suffers specifically in their capacity as a knower or epistemic agent – that is, as someone who produc...
An epistemic justice account of students’ experiences of feedback
An epistemic justice account of students’ experiences of feedback
I am a storyteller. I believe in the power of stories to share experiences and to elucidate thoughts and ideas and to help us to make sense of complex social practices. This thesis...
Basic Blame and Basic Praise
Basic Blame and Basic Praise
Abstract This chapter defends an account of what the blameworthy and praiseworthy are worthy of: basic blame and basic praise. Given the wide variety of responses th...
People Systematically Update Moral Judgments of Blame
People Systematically Update Moral Judgments of Blame
Six experiments examine people's updating of blame judgments and test predictions developed from a socially-regulated blame perspective. According to this perspective, blame emerge...
College Students’ Epistemic Cognition, Epistemic Emotion, and Engagement: A Mediation Analysis
College Students’ Epistemic Cognition, Epistemic Emotion, and Engagement: A Mediation Analysis
Abstract Background: The college students' engagement has attracted the attention of scholars from various countries because it can impact student’s learning performance, ...
Epistemic Injustice or Epistemic Oppression?
Epistemic Injustice or Epistemic Oppression?
The concepts of epistemic injustice and epistemic oppression both aim to track obstacles to epistemic agencyーi.e., forms of epistemic exclusionーthat are undue and persistent. Indee...
Epistemic Diversity and Deliberation
Epistemic Diversity and Deliberation
We live in uncertain times. In the midst of polarization, the rise of fake news and disinformation and with expert knowledge and scientific argumentation losing credibility in the ...
The Significance of Philosophical Scepticism
The Significance of Philosophical Scepticism
Abstract The thesis of scepticism is a thesis about the human condition: the view that we can know nothing, or that nothing is certain, or that everything is open...

Back to Top