Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Psychosocial and Health-Related Experiences of Individuals With Microtia and Craniofacial Microsomia and Their Families: Narrative Review Over 2 Decades

View through CrossRef
This paper describes 20 years of microtia and craniofacial microsomia (CFM) psychosocial and healthcare studies and suggests directions for clinical care and research. A narrative review of papers January 2000 to July 2021 related to psychosocial and healthcare experiences of individuals with microtia and CFM and their families. Studies (N = 64) were mainly cross-sectional (69%), included a range of standardized measures (64%), and were with European (31%), American (27%), or multinational (23%) samples. Data were generally collected from both patients and caregivers (38%) or patient self-report (35%). Sample sizes were 11 to 25 (21%), 26 to 50 (19%), 51 to 100 (22%), or over 100 (38%). Studies addressed 5 primary topics: (1) Healthcare Experiences, including Medical Care, Hearing Loss/Amplification, Diagnostic Experiences, and Information Preferences; (2) Psychosocial Experiences, including Teasing, Behavioral Adjustment, Psychosocial Support, and Public Perception; (3) Neurocognitive Functioning and Academic Assistance; (4) Pre- and Post-Operative Psychosocial Outcomes of Ear Reconstruction/Canaloplasty; and (5) Quality of Life and Patient Satisfaction. Care involved multiple specialties and was often experienced as stressful starting at diagnosis. Psychosocial and neurocognitive functioning were generally in the average range, with possible risk for social and language concerns. Coping and resiliency were described into adulthood. Satisfaction and positive benefit of ear reconstruction/canaloplasty were high. Care recommendations include increasing: hearing amplification use, microtia and CFM knowledge among providers, efficient treatment coordination, psychosocial support, academic assistance, and advances to minimize surgical scarring. This broad literature overview informs clinical practice and research to improve psychosocial outcomes.
Title: Psychosocial and Health-Related Experiences of Individuals With Microtia and Craniofacial Microsomia and Their Families: Narrative Review Over 2 Decades
Description:
This paper describes 20 years of microtia and craniofacial microsomia (CFM) psychosocial and healthcare studies and suggests directions for clinical care and research.
A narrative review of papers January 2000 to July 2021 related to psychosocial and healthcare experiences of individuals with microtia and CFM and their families.
Studies (N = 64) were mainly cross-sectional (69%), included a range of standardized measures (64%), and were with European (31%), American (27%), or multinational (23%) samples.
Data were generally collected from both patients and caregivers (38%) or patient self-report (35%).
Sample sizes were 11 to 25 (21%), 26 to 50 (19%), 51 to 100 (22%), or over 100 (38%).
Studies addressed 5 primary topics: (1) Healthcare Experiences, including Medical Care, Hearing Loss/Amplification, Diagnostic Experiences, and Information Preferences; (2) Psychosocial Experiences, including Teasing, Behavioral Adjustment, Psychosocial Support, and Public Perception; (3) Neurocognitive Functioning and Academic Assistance; (4) Pre- and Post-Operative Psychosocial Outcomes of Ear Reconstruction/Canaloplasty; and (5) Quality of Life and Patient Satisfaction.
Care involved multiple specialties and was often experienced as stressful starting at diagnosis.
Psychosocial and neurocognitive functioning were generally in the average range, with possible risk for social and language concerns.
Coping and resiliency were described into adulthood.
Satisfaction and positive benefit of ear reconstruction/canaloplasty were high.
Care recommendations include increasing: hearing amplification use, microtia and CFM knowledge among providers, efficient treatment coordination, psychosocial support, academic assistance, and advances to minimize surgical scarring.
This broad literature overview informs clinical practice and research to improve psychosocial outcomes.

Related Results

Multidisciplinary Treatment of Hemifacial Microsomia: Several Clinical Cases
Multidisciplinary Treatment of Hemifacial Microsomia: Several Clinical Cases
Hemifacial microsomia is the second most common congenital anomaly of the craniofacial region. Hemifacial microsomia is characterised by unilateral hypoplasia of the ear. Treatment...
The Phenolyzer Suite: Prioritizing the Candidate Genes Involved in Microtia
The Phenolyzer Suite: Prioritizing the Candidate Genes Involved in Microtia
Objective: Microtia is a congenital malformation of the external ear. Great progress about the genetic of microtia has been made in recent years. This article w...
Family Pediatrics
Family Pediatrics
ABSTRACT/EXECUTIVE SUMMARYWhy a Task Force on the Family?The practice of pediatrics is unique among medical specialties in many ways, among which is the nearly certain presence of ...
Anxiety, Depression, Stress, and Self-Esteem in Turkish Parents of Children with Microtia
Anxiety, Depression, Stress, and Self-Esteem in Turkish Parents of Children with Microtia
Objective To describe factors affecting anxiety, depression, stress, and self-esteem in parents of children with microtia. ...
Key features of anaplastology of auricle for craniofacial microsomia
Key features of anaplastology of auricle for craniofacial microsomia
Congenital microtia (partial and total absence of auricle) are symptoms of craniofacial microsomia syndrome. One of the methods for restoring of auricle is anaplastology based on e...
Three-Dimensional Facial Morphology in Patients with Craniofacial Microsomia and Microtia
Three-Dimensional Facial Morphology in Patients with Craniofacial Microsomia and Microtia
Background: Craniofacial microsomia (CFM) is classified using the subjective orbit, mandible, ear, nerve, and soft tissue (OMENS) tool. Digital stereophotogrammetry (ie...

Back to Top